Newcastle Fan Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 He'll do very well for them, just hope him leaving makes us a better team too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RR15 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Thanks for the goals Demba, see you back at St.James' on the 2nd Feb Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
steve_69 Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Always shit to lose a proven goalscorer but the circus surrounding him had become disruptive and his insistence on playing centrally upset the balance of what was, last season, a very effective team. I've no doubt Cisse can rediscover his scoring touch when playing centrally and if (and it's a big IF) we can sign a decent quality replacement we might actually come out of this transfer window in a stronger position. Over to you Dekka & Mike, please don't fuck this up! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Purple players lile Ba, have always been replaced with at least the same quality if not better. Although we will miss his goals, It was always going to go this way. People forget that he did the same with Hoffe, West Ham and now us. As soon as more money was waved at him he was away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Obviously, we dont want to lose players of Ba's talent but this really is the best solution all round considering the circumstances. He's been touting himself around for 12 months and he's a potential firecracker in the dressing room, regardless of Pardew's nice quotes about him yesterday. He's also making Cisse's situation tricky, since Cisse isn't suited to that wide role. At least we can wash our hands of the situation now, hopefully we can find a suitable replacement for him before the window closes and one who fits the team we have and doesn't have a release clause. I know Remy's name has been mentioned countless times but expect Andy Carroll's name to dominate the back pages if Remy doesn't happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Purple players lile Ba, have always been replaced with at least the same quality if not better. Not always straight away though and we need to replace him asap. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 How can Chelsea get Ba and lose Sturridge and be in a net cash inflow position? Doesn't make sense. Bastards. Last time it was us, replacing Carroll with Ba, Cabaye, Marveaux, Obertan and Cisse and still being well up in net cash What's also quite interesting is that in January 2011 Torres left Liverpool for Chelsea for £50m and Carroll left us for Liverpool for £35m. With Ba coming here for free and being seen as almost an after thought in the whole saga. Now Ba could be going off to replace Torres and a backup player from Chelsea could be off to Liverpool to replace Carroll Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 By the way, Mike and Dekka will still see this as 4m (or whatever the final slice) profit on him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest SHMDJ Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Should be taking a look at Shane Long. Out of contract in 18 months so possible to get a good price and would fit in well Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 By the way, Mike and Dekka will still see this as 4m (or whatever the final slice) profit on him. After what we paid him and his clowns to sign him + wages + the £2m he gets when he leaves is there any profit ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ponsaelius Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 How can Chelsea get Ba and lose Sturridge and be in a net cash inflow position? Doesn't make sense. Bastards. Last time it was us, replacing Carroll with Ba, Cabaye, Marveaux, Obertan and Cisse and still being well up in net cash What's also quite interesting is that in January 2011 Torres left Liverpool for Chelsea for £50m and Carroll left us for Liverpool for £35m. With Ba coming here for free and being seen as almost an after thought in the whole saga. Now Ba could be going off to replace Torres and a backup player from Chelsea could be off to Liverpool to replace Carroll I don't think he's going there to replace Torres. He's an opportunistic replacement for Sturridge. Not to say he doesn't have what it takes to subvert him when he gets his chance, but I think their thinking is short term rotation option until they can get Falcao and Lukaku comes back next summer. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Decky Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Should be taking a look at Shane Long. Out of contract in 18 months so possible to get a good price and would fit in well He'd probably sooner sign a new contract than leave and come here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 at Teasy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 By the way, Mike and Dekka will still see this as 4m (or whatever the final slice) profit on him. After what we paid him and his clowns to sign him + wages + the £2m he gets when he leaves is there any profit ? Depends on what the true fee is and his wages I suppose. Also depends if you actually include wages in there since that's what the player is paid to do his job, and he's certainly done that since he's been here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 How can Chelsea get Ba and lose Sturridge and be in a net cash inflow position? Doesn't make sense. Bastards. Last time it was us, replacing Carroll with Ba, Cabaye, Marveaux, Obertan and Cisse and still being well up in net cash What's also quite interesting is that in January 2011 Torres left Liverpool for Chelsea for £50m and Carroll left us for Liverpool for £35m. With Ba coming here for free and being seen as almost an after thought in the whole saga. Now Ba could be going off to replace Torres and a backup player from Chelsea could be off to Liverpool to replace Carroll I don't think he's going there to replace Torres. He's an opportunistic replacement for Sturridge. Not to say he doesn't have what it takes to subvert him when he gets his chance, but I think their thinking is short term rotation option until they can get Falcao and Lukaku comes back next summer. I agree, its just funny to think about the possibility. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 Farewell Demba. From the Ramadan flop to the post-Ramadan sensation. Your goals will always be appreciated. Can't fault your philosophy in life, but shame about your entourage - they're all cunts. Not gonna be wishing good luck as I'm a bitter cunt myself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 at Teasy. I don't know what I've done but I'm always happy when I entertain a stranger. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ItalianMagpie Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 What's the difference between what's happened today and what happened 3 days ago? Hadn't Ba already been granted the permission to speak to Chelsea, when the "unproductive talks" took place? If it's the same situation I can't see why now he's practically gone Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 We signed a striker on a free, he scored lots of goals for us, promoted strawberry syrup, got us into Europe and earnt a move to the European champions. Nothing too bad about that tbh, you could call him a moneygrabber but that's the going rate for the elite clubs. The only things that irk me are his agents and that he's going to warm their bench. At least the deal is done early and the circus is over. If you believe we'll replace him, things aren't so bad. Onwards and upwards! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 No loyalty to the club who took a risk on him. Thanks BA, tonight is Cisse's night to get back on form and show Ba we don't need him. West Ham? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 What's the difference between what's happened today and what happened 3 days ago? Hadn't Ba already been granted the permission to speak to Chelsea, when the "unproductive talks" took place? If it's the same situation I can't see why now he's practically gone It's a bit different when it's posted on the official website and when he gets withdrawn from the squad like. http://www.nufc.co.uk/articles/20130102/club-statement-demba-ba_2281670_3024928 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Unbelievable Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 How can Chelsea get Ba and lose Sturridge and be in a net cash inflow position? Doesn't make sense. Bastards. Last time it was us, replacing Carroll with Ba, Cabaye, Marveaux, Obertan and Cisse and still being well up in net cash What's also quite interesting is that in January 2011 Torres left Liverpool for Chelsea for £50m and Carroll left us for Liverpool for £35m. With Ba coming here for free and being seen as almost an after thought in the whole saga. Now Ba could be going off to replace Torres and a backup player from Chelsea could be off to Liverpool to replace Carroll Aye, remember not being impressed at all when we got Ba in on a free to be our main striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest firetotheworks Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 At Teasy (I can't quote on this PC for some reason) I was just laughing at the whole Torres-Carroll-Ba-Sturridge merry-go-round. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Teasy Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 At Teasy (I can't quote on this PC for some reason) I was just laughing at the whole Torres-Carroll-Ba-Sturridge merry-go-round. Ah right, weird, try changing the browser? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest ItalianMagpie Posted January 2, 2013 Share Posted January 2, 2013 What's the difference between what's happened today and what happened 3 days ago? Hadn't Ba already been granted the permission to speak to Chelsea, when the "unproductive talks" took place? If it's the same situation I can't see why now he's practically gone It's a bit different when it's posted on the official website and when he gets withdrawn from the squad like. http://www.nufc.co.uk/articles/20130102/club-statement-demba-ba_2281670_3024928 I know, but I don't understand how it went then: 3 days ago there was no offer and no meeting with Chelsea? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now