Interpolic Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 How is there such a disparity in the possession stats between Sky and BBC? Weird. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Hansen feels Luiz is lucky. Surprised, tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Krul did not make "9 sensational saves" like, that's a bit of an exaggeration there Hanson Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Just seen the Luiz incident for the first time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
alexf Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 love how they arnt going to mention Coloccini going off which is crucial to us defensively Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Hope the ref has to officiate a few lower league games now, absolute joke. If he watches that back and still thinks he was in the right he deserves shot with shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Was it Lovenkrands' pass? He actually played some really good outside of the foot shit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Ah, the referees favouring the big teams again. Such a thoughtful analysis. Can a referee ever get it wrong without being a cheat or a bottler? Only when we benefit, clearly. He bottled the decision. But I don't think it had anything to do with Chelsea per se. If the roles were reversed, I don't think he would have sent our man off either. There is absolutely no excuse or reason he could give to justify his decision (or lack thereof). Getting the decision wrong would have meant him waving the play on. He pulled up the play for a foul, correctly adjudging Luiz had brought down Ba who was clean through etc.... But there is an excuse/justification. He thinks Ba won't get on the end of that pass, and therefore it's a cynical foul but not a goalscoring opportunity, hence the yellow. That's not to say that he's right, just that he does have a justification. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Just seen the Luiz incident for the first time. Ba was nowhere near, well he was actually right next to the ball but other than that he was nowhere near. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 talking about O'Squeal after our analysis. MACKEMEDIA Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 How the fuck would Ba not have been on control of that pass, it was right into his path. Joke. One touch to take it wide of the goalkeeper and another to slide it in. The pass and run were perfect. Ludicrous decision, just like last week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Just seen the Luiz incident for the first time. Ba was nowhere near, well he was actually right next to the ball but other than that he was nowhere near. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
tmonkey Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 How the f*** would Ba not have been on control of that pass, it was right into his path. Joke. One touch to take it wide of the goalkeeper and another to slide it in. The pass and run were perfect. Ludicrous decision, just like last week. This is Ba, not the Brazilian Ronaldo. First touch out of play for a goalkick, the next touch would be Ba's head hitting the ground as he falls over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 He only didn't have control of the ball because Luiz prevented him from doing so Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Ah, the referees favouring the big teams again. Such a thoughtful analysis. Can a referee ever get it wrong without being a cheat or a bottler? Only when we benefit, clearly. He bottled the decision. But I don't think it had anything to do with Chelsea per se. If the roles were reversed, I don't think he would have sent our man off either. There is absolutely no excuse or reason he could give to justify his decision (or lack thereof). Getting the decision wrong would have meant him waving the play on. He pulled up the play for a foul, correctly adjudging Luiz had brought down Ba who was clean through etc.... But there is an excuse/justification. He thinks Ba won't get on the end of that pass, and therefore it's a cynical foul but not a goalscoring opportunity, hence the yellow. That's not to say that he's right, just that he does have a justification. Nonesense. There was millimeters in it. Not like Ba would still have had a long way to go to reach the ball, or a lot more to do to have a goalscoring chance. The ref can't take it upon himself to make assumptions, especially as his decision was so easy to make. He used that excuse to cover his ass, the wanker that he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 How the f*** would Ba not have been on control of that pass, it was right into his path. Joke. One touch to take it wide of the goalkeeper and another to slide it in. The pass and run were perfect. Ludicrous decision, just like last week. This is Ba, not the Brazilian Ronaldo. First touch out of play for a goalkick, the next touch would be Ba's head hitting the ground as he falls over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 How the f*** would Ba not have been on control of that pass, it was right into his path. Joke. One touch to take it wide of the goalkeeper and another to slide it in. The pass and run were perfect. Ludicrous decision, just like last week. This is Ba, not the Brazilian Ronaldo. First touch out of play for a goalkick, the next touch would be Ba's head hitting the ground as he falls over. Whatever. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 How the f*** would Ba not have been on control of that pass, it was right into his path. Joke. One touch to take it wide of the goalkeeper and another to slide it in. The pass and run were perfect. Ludicrous decision, just like last week. This is Ba, not the Brazilian Ronaldo. First touch out of play for a goalkick, the next touch would be Ba's head hitting the ground as he falls over. www.mikedeanfans.com/forum Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Fucking Cajun on the case now. Leave it Monkey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cajun Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Fucking Cajun on the case now. Leave it Monkey. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Absolutley abysmal, I didn't understand it not being red at the game, I understand it less watching it back. What a bent cunt of a ref, at lest he followed it up with a whole host of other poor decisions. Tosspot. On a seperate note, what a bellend Sturridge is, surprised he didn't get his head caught in the tunnel the prick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest BlacknWhiteArmy Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Fucking Cajun on the case now. Leave it Monkey. Your love for Demba. How dare he! I agree though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Absolutley abysmal, I didn't understand it not being red at the game, I understand it less watching it back. What a bent cunt of a ref, at lest he followed it up with a whole host of other poor decisions. Tosspot. On a seperate note, what a bellend Sturridge is, surprised he didn't get his head caught in the tunnel the prick. There was one shocking dive on the wing in the first half. Absolute arse. Daft cunt can't shoot either. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Absolutley abysmal, I didn't understand it not being red at the game, I understand it less watching it back. What a bent cunt of a ref, at lest he followed it up with a whole host of other poor decisions. Tosspot. On a seperate note, what a bellend Sturridge is, surprised he didn't get his head caught in the tunnel the prick. Sturridge really needs to improve his finishing, it's not the first time I've seen him be very wasteful. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted December 3, 2011 Share Posted December 3, 2011 Ah, the referees favouring the big teams again. Such a thoughtful analysis. Can a referee ever get it wrong without being a cheat or a bottler? Only when we benefit, clearly. He bottled the decision. But I don't think it had anything to do with Chelsea per se. If the roles were reversed, I don't think he would have sent our man off either. There is absolutely no excuse or reason he could give to justify his decision (or lack thereof). Getting the decision wrong would have meant him waving the play on. He pulled up the play for a foul, correctly adjudging Luiz had brought down Ba who was clean through etc.... But there is an excuse/justification. He thinks Ba won't get on the end of that pass, and therefore it's a cynical foul but not a goalscoring opportunity, hence the yellow. That's not to say that he's right, just that he does have a justification. he'll justify himself by saying that, all the while knowing it was wrong. i think it had as much to do with the timing of it, you know what refs are like for giving big decisions like that too early, had it happened 10mins later, who knows ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now