Jump to content

Dogawful Officiating - Dave Coote suspended


Guest YANKEEBLEEDSMAGPIE

Recommended Posts

7 minutes ago, Scoot said:

Imagine the same situation but at the other end of the pitch. VAR would have been all over it to award a penalty to Chelsea.

 

 


Wouldn’t have needed VAR as the ref would have gave it in an instant.

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 23/01/2022 at 18:13, HaydnNUFC said:

West Ham (h) pen

Villa (a) Pen and red card for Martinez wasn't given for a bollocks 'offside' after we were told 'level' was coming back

Brighton (a) pen was iffy

Arsenal (a) no pen given to Schar in the first half at 0-0, more of a pen than the one on Wilson which got more coverage at 1-0

Leicester (a) pen

Liverpool (a) not exactly VAR but play not being stopped for their equaliser

Man City (h) no pen given on Fraser

Man Utd (h) arguable red card not being given to Rapenaldo

Leeds (a) no pen given on ASM

 

 

 

 

From this season, now with added Chelsea (a) bullshit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, Fantail Breeze said:

When was the last dodgy decision with benefitted from? 

 

In terms of any decision tbh;

 

Leeds (h) they should've had a pen 

Norwich (h) only pen we've had this season

Brentford (a) red card for them

 

That's it. 

 

 

Edited by HaydnNUFC

Link to post
Share on other sites

26 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

Sky say the VAR excuse was that the shirt pull wasn’t enough to go down :lol:

 

Ignoring the challenge with the leg which actually sent him down.

 

Fuck off man. How can it not be a clear and obvious error when he gave a corner, despite the Chelsea player not touching the ball?

 

 

 

Thats radge that. Why would it have to be enough to go down for it to be a foul, a short sharp yank would be enough to put someone off their kick/stride and be a foul.

 

 

Edited by Wolfcastle

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111
1 minute ago, Fantail Breeze said:

When was the last dodgy decision we benefitted from? 

 

 

 

 

One comes to mind is Lascelles vs Liverpool when he shoved over one of their players.  Clear pen.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Amir_9 said:

If VAR doesn't fix situations like this then there is fuck all point in it existing

 

The only point I can see in it is to help our Lordly Big Six teams maintain their position. That would make sense.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'm all for the League and refs finally clamping down on players flopping too easily. But what a strange moment to make that stand.

 

The whole conclusion of the incident becomes ridiculously non sensical: they miss or don't even address the trip so Murphy went down unnaturally is the line, yet doesn't get sanctioned for it and they also still gave the corner.

 

Retards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Said it before, so long as those corrupt and incompetent bastards are in charge of VAR, it will be the same old story.

The whole footballing authority in this country needs to be ripped up and started again, from the FA, down the leagues to the EFL, and the referees.

The whole lot stinks of corruption.

Link to post
Share on other sites

10 minutes ago, Wolfcastle said:

Thats radge that. Why would it have to be enough to go down for it to be a foul, a short sharp yank would be enough to put someone off their kick/stride and be a foul.

 

 

 

They tried to claim Rodri didn't handle the ball a few weeks ago. They've set a precedent where none of their bullshit reasons, always backed up by Peter Defaulton, are as bad by comparison.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

When was the last dodgy decision we benefitted from? 

 

 

 

Probably Rennie sending Shearer off for nowt, which lead to Shearer being suspended and not starting against the mackems, which lead to Sir Bobby arriving.

Link to post
Share on other sites

So if a referee gives a corner (clearly thinking the players got the ball) and the replays show he  didn't get the ball, I'm not sure how clear and obvious of a mistake it has to be

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, joeyt said:

So if a referee gives a corner (clearly thinking the players got the ball) and the replays show he  didn't get the ball, I'm not sure how clear and obvious of a mistake it has to be

 

The high camera angle (the only one which shows him stepping across Murphy) shows that there was 4 players between him an the incident, it was impossible for him to knowingly give the right decision

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, geordie_b said:

 

The high camera angle (the only one which shows him stepping across Murphy) shows that there was 4 players between him an the incident, it was impossible for him to knowingly give the right decision

Exactly - the angle of the referee did look like it could have been a corner but once it was established that he didn't get anywhere near the ball, it's surely a clear and obvious mistake

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, joeyt said:

Exactly - the angle of the referee did look like it could have been a corner but once it was established that he didn't get anywhere near the ball, it's surely a clear and obvious mistake

 

They didn’t even seemingly look at that bit, only the shirt pull - based on their non-explanation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, joeyt said:

Exactly - the angle of the referee did look like it could have been a corner but once it was established that he didn't get anywhere near the ball, it's surely a clear and obvious mistake

 

That's the main thing which makes the decision so dubious within their rules as it was obvious Coote didn't see it properly. No shirt pulling from Murphy either so there are no excuses.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Actually breathtaking how they brought in VAR to reduce controversy and try to make the game fairer and the way it’s implemented does the opposite. They need to start giving us the audio of the VAR discussion so that these people can be held accountable 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111
5 minutes ago, Pata said:

 

That's the main thing which makes the decision so dubious within their rules as it was obvious Coote didn't see it properly. No shirt pulling from Murphy either so there are no excuses.

 

Yeah, on the replays it shows the ref has a bad view.  Hence why VAR was created ffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...