joeyt Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 He best get banned. I know it won't get us the points but i'm bitter and i will enjoy it Hopefully helps that Brighton will only have old man Murray as their striker for 3 games if he's fit Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 He'll be banned now like, we've proper grassed him up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Well that makes a change. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mike Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Actually surprised. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I still have no clue what this is about. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheInfiniteOdyssey Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Actually surprised. I'm absolutely gobsmacked tbh. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 So it's just MOTD2 who come out of this looking like absolute tossers then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bimpy474 Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Bet they appeal and he gets off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I'm surprised he's being charged. While I think he did do it deliberately based on him having a go at Yedlin moments earlier, I think it's a one that's hard to prove was deliberate as a stand-alone moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I'm surprised he's being charged. While I think he did do it deliberately based on him having a go at Yedlin moments earlier, I think it's a one that's hard to prove was deliberate as a stand-alone moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 I'm surprised he's being charged. While I think he did do it deliberately based on him having a go at Yedlin moments earlier, I think it's a one that's hard to prove was deliberate as a stand-alone moment. The FA don't need to "prove" anything going by Shelvey's "racist" comment charge last season. All the witnesses for the "prosecution" had a different version of what Shelvey supposedly said while all the NUFC players who said he didn't say what he was accused of were ignored. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanji Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Hemed tried to kill Yedlin imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dave Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Can see him getting off anyway tbh. No way of proving guilt, it's markedly different to the Shelvey one. And 'he's not that kind of player' will count for something. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LoveItIfWeBeatU Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Has anyone ever not been banned after being charged by the FA? I'd be amazed if he wasn't banned now they've reviewed it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Can see him getting off anyway tbh. No way of proving guilt, it's markedly different to the Shelvey one. And 'he's not that kind of player' will count for something. Nah it's blatant as hell, it's obvious what he's tried to do which is why the FA have charged him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 25, 2017 Share Posted September 25, 2017 Can see him getting off anyway tbh. No way of proving guilt, it's markedly different to the Shelvey one. And 'he's not that kind of player' will count for something. Nah it's blatant as hell, it's obvious what he's tried to do which is why the FA have charged him. I thought it was definitely deliberate. As far as I recall Yedlin pulled his legs back in to avoid crashing into Hemed and then Hemed seemed to pause before choosing to stand on Yedlin. I immediately thought it was afters from their previous spat. Deserves a ban if they are being consistent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
themanupstairs Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Intent is clear as day, especially considering the handbags moments earlier. Wouldn't have been charged if the FA thought it was accidental. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 The FA has to take into account that Hemed actually had a go at Yedlin moments earlier. Yedlin was cool as fuck, even though the provocation from Hemed was clear. Ban him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 But, this is plucky little Brighton, who's team has such a great connection with their fans, and they make their home games like cup tie atmospheres (MOTD2). Plus, we nicked their Championship title off them on the last day last season. Yedlin will probably get banned instead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Arguably the strongest sanction a team can face is having a player sent off early in a game, probably more so than a three game ban given after a player has played the full game. They still field eleven players during the ban. Perhaps they should consider something like one game less ban if a sending off occurs in the first half, as opposed to a ban given retrospectively. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Nah disagree with that mind. Think that Watford player knee capped someone in the first half. No way should that merit him being off the pitch less time than Shelvey and Hemed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Benwell Lad Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 Nah disagree with that mind. Think that Watford player knee capped someone in the first half. No way should that merit him being off the pitch less time than Shelvey and Hemed. I meant when comparing two equal offences. Obviously a more serious offence should mean a longer ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted September 26, 2017 Share Posted September 26, 2017 If a player is banned in the first half of the season, that player should be banned for the next two league games, then wait for the return game to serve his last ban. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now