Guest DebuchyAndTheBeast Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Doesn't like scoring tap ins , does he? . 2-0 up and it was always going to be another match, with less pressure off each player. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Had he taken his chances would have been a comfortable win Chances? what game was you watching? i only saw one chance and granted he should have scored it blindfolded but none the less i'm more concerned about the aforementioned lack of creation and sitting back as soon as we get a lead looking to do nothing but hold a lead. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sifu Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Needs to be shown a video of his miss today tbh. Needs to really learn that sometimes keeping it simple is the key. Like someone at work advised me the other day, KISS (Keep it simple stupid - I do realise this is a bit harsh...). Would definitely still have him as our main striker for the forseeable future mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 For someone so dependent on others to score regularly, his finishing isn't good enough imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
binnsy Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Cost us 2 points today, at this level you can't afford to miss chances given to you on a plate by the opposition. It's probably true in theory but it's still harsh. We should be creating more chances, not missing the couple we do create and then looking back and saying "what if"? He also assisted our first goal, so perhaps he gained us a point? yes he set up the first goal but games are always broke down to big moments and that miss was absolutely massive in the context of the game, we were bossing it and the 2nd goal could have virtually wrapped up the match by half time. In the end we go in 1 up at HT, they regroup make a tactical change and come out a different side and put us on the back foot and we struggled to get back into the game. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Had he taken his chances would have been a comfortable win Chances? what game was you watching? i only saw one chance and granted he should have scored it blindfolded but none the less i'm more concerned about the aforementioned lack of creation and sitting back as soon as we get a lead looking to do nothing but hold a lead. Shots at goal = clear cut chances to some people, man. Anyway he was pretty poor second half and he missed an absolute sitter. It's just a massive shame that neither him nor anyone else were given the chance to rectify it. Hence he's shit and is no longer good enough for us until he bundles home an injury time winner next week with his inly shot on goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Cost us 2 points today, at this level you can't afford to miss chances given to you on a plate by the opposition. It's probably true in theory but it's still harsh. We should be creating more chances, not missing the couple we do create and then looking back and saying "what if"? He also assisted our first goal, so perhaps he gained us a point? yes he set up the first goal but games are always broke down to big moments and that miss was absolutely massive in the context of the game, we were bossing it and the 2nd goal could have virtually wrapped up the match by half time. In the end we go in 1 up at HT, they regroup make a tactical change and come out a different side and put us on the back foot and we struggled to get back into the game. Aye that's definitely true, as I said theoretically I suppose he did lose us the points with that miss. It isn't his fault that we done absolutely nothing of note after that though and he wasn't exactly given the chance to redeem himself. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 This "lack of chances" thing is bollocks. If our team can't create a lot of chances (and we created enouh to be 2/3 up by half time) for our striker then our striker needs to: 1. Create chances for himself ala Suarez 2. Create chances for others ala Berbatov 3. Score from scraps ala Ba 4. Be a target to play around ala Carroll (sorry but this is true) What he can't do. Is need 4 clear-cut chances to score 1 goal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 I would just prefer the manager to get the team functioning well as a unit personally, not having a striker who supposedly does everything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The College Dropout Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 I would just prefer the manager to get the team functioning well as a unit personally, not having a striker who supposedly does everything. All the lad offers is goals and he's not great at that either. What I would like is a striker that can contribute to the other 10 players and isn't just reliant on the others performing for him. Doesn't do enough for the team. Not brilliant at what he does. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stottie Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 He hit the cross for our goal ffs. Isn't that a contribution? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ScottishMagpie Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 How long has he been with us and Pardew still doesn't have a system that supplies our no.1 striker with a regular supply of chances?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Not good enough to be our main striker. Of course he is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Not good enough to be our main striker. Of course he is. He is but his hold up play would embarrass a League Two striker at the moment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Varadi Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Could've won us the game with a cooler head. I like him but he really can't shoulder our goalscoring burden on his own. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest icemanblue Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Not good enough to be our main striker. Of course he is. He is but his hold up play would embarrass a League Two striker, today. I can't do this all night, like. I'm off out in a minute. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 I would just prefer the manager to get the team functioning well as a unit personally, not having a striker who supposedly does everything. All the lad offers is goals and he's not great at that either. What I would like is a striker that can contribute to the other 10 players and isn't just reliant on the others performing for him. Doesn't do enough for the team. Not brilliant at what he does. Ah right mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Not good enough to be our main striker. Of course he is. He is but his hold up play would embarrass a League Two striker at the moment. Might be a good idea to stop treating him as a target man then ( not aimed at you btw im quite aware you realise this) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Not good enough to be our main striker. Of course he is. He is but his hold up play would embarrass a League Two striker at the moment. Might be a good idea to stop treating him as a target man then ( not aimed at you btw im quite aware you realise this) Exactly. Especially when he has hardly any support at all. He needs to be running onto things. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElDiablo Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 He's asked to do far too much in this system, he's got to be the one getting up for headers from punted balls, running the channels, linking up when it's played into feet, and get on the end of things in the box. Unless you're Didier Drogba circa 2004-2010 then you're not going to achieve that. Needs players in, around and past him. How often does Sissoko run past him anymore, compared to when he first joined? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tachikoma Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Loves a first time/early hit waaaaay too much, especially when he isn't quite in-form. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
S.S.R. Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 http://i38.tinypic.com/346vux2.jpg Obertan putting away a similar-looking chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magorific Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Thought his derby display would more or less put the debate about his all-round contribution to bed. Sadly not. He's one of the least of our worries. Anyone who can't see that actually deserves what we're all getting. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRC Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Even Shearer would look shite in this line up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted April 20, 2013 Share Posted April 20, 2013 Getting frustrated by the amount of chances it's taking for him to put one away. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now