Jump to content

Newcastle 2 - 1 Spurs - 18/08/12 - post-match jubilation from page 35


Recommended Posts

The argument of having a 'goal threat' in the side means it matters little even if they are a terrible footballers is ridiculously simplistic.

 

The above is an impossible and exaggerated example.

 

You've gone too far the other way by calling him shit though, tbf. His trigger-happy feet are a valuable quality that a lot of sides wouldn't mind.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest optimistic nit

Kevin Nolan scores goals. Case closed.

 

:lol: Isn't the point of football to score goals?

 

No. It's to score them and work as a team to prevent them. Defoe is a player that is carried for his goal scoring ability. Aside from that he offers zero.

 

 

When you compare Defoe to Suarez, who is essentially the polar opposite of Defoe, i know who i would rather have in my team. What is the point of having a striker that can break teams down if every time he gets in the box he fucks it up?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Wasn't pretty as to many players were having an off day in terms of passing but could just be down to lack of a full pre season.

 

Obertan looks so dumb at times like he's thinking too much about what to do, and ends up doing fuck all. Need shot if he doesn't pull his socks up.

 

Still! Gotta laugh at Spurs though, love beating those twats however we do it.  :coolsmiley:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Nolan Nolan Nolan Nolan

 

      Defoe Defoe

 

What a front 6 that would be. Guarenteed goal threat and thus 10 goals a game.

 

Jesus. Thought you were a batter poster than that pile of shite.

 

Oh get over yourself. You've been responding with sarcastic one liners the whole time too.

 

'Would hate to have a goal threat in my side like'

 

'He's actually scored nearly 200 career goals. Means he's good.'

 

Point a: both sarcastic and completely ignorant of the point trying to be made

Point b: A simplistic argument that again ignores the entire point of the argument.

If my daft and not-completely-serious post offended you, then you should reassess the above comments.

 

Defoe is an extremely limited player who will score goals. It doesn't make him a great player or one anybody has to rate because of it. I think he's 'shit' because he is extremely selfish, breaks down numerous attacks through his selfishness and poor decision making/intelligence, is extremely difficult to competently fit into a functioning side both as a lone striker and when paired with somebody who doesn't suit his game.

 

I generally just think he's crap and that no side who ever wants to achieve anything would ever bother to play him. His 'smack the ball with the same technique every time he gets it' routine would be a useful attribute for a shit or at least mid-table side, admittedly. Maybe at a stretch a wildcard option from the bench for a bigger side.

 

This is my opinion and I won't change it. No matter how many goals Defoe scores this season and hilarious comments occur when he does. Because as long as he is playing every week for Spurs then they have absolutely zero chance of getting into the Champions League. His overall game and ability level will see to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think we did enough to stay in the game, and when you do that you've always got a chance of winning with the quality we possess. Spurs are a good and balanced side tbf so this is a valuable win. They probably deserved a point though.

 

We keep the ball so much better playing 433 as well, and are less predictable. First half they pressured high and we had no ideas, looked very rigid and incapable of breaking them down, good change from Pards but I see no reason to play 442 at all tbh...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think we did enough to stay in the game, and when you do that you've always got a chance of winning with the quality we possess. Spurs are a good and balanced side tbf so this is a valuable win. They probably deserved a point though.

 

We keep the ball so much better playing 433 as well, and are less predictable. First half they pressured high and we had no ideas, looked very rigid and incapable of breaking them down, good change from Pards but I see no reason to play 442 at all tbh...

 

Agree with all of this.

 

I know it is becoming the standard point of reference for the forum but we consistently look much better when we switch to the 4-3-3. We instantly match or outnumber the opposition in midfield for a start.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only player I can think of at the moment who is a pure goalscorer and plays for a top side is Hernandez. He's better than Defoe though. He has forged functioning partnerships with the players he's been upfront with at Man Utd and is generally just more intelligent with most aspects of the game - despite having the touch of a rapist and not much else to his game outside of the box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's not even THAT good of a goalscorer. I mean he is good, but if a club like Tottenham want a poacher in the starting XI he has to be scoring more than he does.

 

Agreed he had 7 or 8 shots today and scored from one of them and even that was a bit lucky if i'm totally honest.

 

If Steven Taylor can remain fit, I have no doubt he'll be a full England international by the end of the season. He's improved absolutely no end, and from such a bad injury, he had a good comeback performance today.

 

Well he was born in Greenwich so he might have a chance.....

Link to post
Share on other sites

Absolutely cracking game. Tremendous atmosphere too.

 

Krul 8

 

Simpson 5.5

Taylor 8

Perch 7

Santon 6

 

Cabaye 6

Tiote 6

Jonas 6.5

 

Ben Arfa 8.5

Cisse 6.5

Ba 7.5

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because as long as he is playing every week for Spurs then they have absolutely zero chance of getting into the Champions League. His overall game and ability level will see to that.

 

This happened a few years ago btw. Played 34 games and scored 18 (24 in all comps) the year they qualified.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kevin Nolan scores goals. Case closed.

 

:lol: Isn't the point of football to score goals?

 

No. It's to score them and work as a team to prevent them. Defoe is a player that is carried for his goal scoring ability. Aside from that he offers zero.

 

That's not true, like. I'm not a massive fan of him but he's more than a scorer of goals.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because as long as he is playing every week for Spurs then they have absolutely zero chance of getting into the Champions League. His overall game and ability level will see to that.

 

This happened a few years ago btw. Played 34 games and scored 18 (24 in all comps) the year they qualified.

 

Weaker league that year. They did it with Huddlestone and Palacios in midfield that year too.

 

Point still stands. They won't be getting close this season unless they can resign Adebayor or get somebody who can be as useful as him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Kevin Nolan scores goals. Case closed.

 

:lol: Isn't the point of football to score goals?

 

No. It's to score them and work as a team to prevent them. Defoe is a player that is carried for his goal scoring ability. Aside from that he offers zero.

 

 

When you compare Defoe to Suarez, who is essentially the polar opposite of Defoe, i know who i would rather have in my team. What is the point of having a striker that can break teams down if every time he gets in the box he f***s it up?

 

You've made that comparison, not me. I was talking about players that can stick it away AND offer more. Not either/or.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because as long as he is playing every week for Spurs then they have absolutely zero chance of getting into the Champions League. His overall game and ability level will see to that.

 

This happened a few years ago btw. Played 34 games and scored 18 (24 in all comps) the year they qualified.

 

Weaker league that year. They did it with Huddlestone and Palacios in midfielder that year too.

 

Point still stands.

 

No it doesn't. You said it wouldn't happen and it already had.

 

Surely having a weak midfield just makes his 24 goals that year even more impressive? What did I say about time and effort?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Because as long as he is playing every week for Spurs then they have absolutely zero chance of getting into the Champions League. His overall game and ability level will see to that.

 

This happened a few years ago btw. Played 34 games and scored 18 (24 in all comps) the year they qualified.

 

Weaker league that year. They did it with Huddlestone and Palacios in midfielder that year too.

 

Point still stands.

 

No it doesn't. You said it wouldn't happen and it already had.

 

Surely having a weak midfield just makes his 24 goals that year even more impressive? What did I say about time and effort?

 

I'm saying it won't happen :lol: That it has happened in a previous season with completely different squads and different teams matters not one jot to the point. Everton got top 4 playing Marcus Bent upfront one year. With the current top 6 or 7, they won't be finishing in the top four unless they can get a better striker. That is my opinion.

 

It was an impressive tally, easily the best of his career and helped by scoring 6 goals in 2 games against Wigan Athletic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...