nufc4eva Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Why do we need to move Colo into midfield? - We have Anita, Tiote and Sissoko why would we want a defender in there. Plus as said he was shit when put there Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 I'm sure advocating Colo for a midfield place was a very serious post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Can't see it being successful. No chance IMO. Makes you wonder why they have lodged it two days after game, must have seen something It does seem as though JFK has decided that a late appeal like this means he gets to play on Saturday, that's the way it worked when he was manager of the year don't you know. "Like having a new signing" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Appeal heard later today. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Most pointless appeal ever. push someone, aggressively go head to head and think that the FA will overturn the referees decision. As likely as a signing in my opinion Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Just hope they don't add another game on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Why. The. Fuck. Pardew's desperate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan_Taylor Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Never getting overturned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 De Jong look that bad ? "fuck me think we had better appeal that red card" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Regardless of whether you think it will be successful or not, the club is right to appeal. It was a preposterous red card. Not appealing because they know the system is ridiculous is tacitly giving that system credence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chrisjraby Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Never getting overturned Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skirge Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Regardless of whether you think it will be successful or not, the club is right to appeal. It was a preposterous red card. Not appealing because they know the system is ridiculous is tacitly giving that system credence. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Like many have said surprised to hear we've appealed it after AP's comments although thinking about them he did lay the blame with the other player and crowd reaction that followed... Norwich appealing must've changed our minds on in at least to the point that it was a no loose situation as it can't be deemed frivolous then... Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wullie Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mattypnufc Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Think they'll use the Shelvey/Debuchy incident as an example. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andymc1 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Stare at other players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Stare at other players. Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 It was a preposterous red card. I really don't think it was. Aye he over-reacted but players know you can't do it, so why do it? 100% stupidity. Can't do what? Basically push your forehead to someone else'. If it's seen it's always going to be a red, like I've said before people were happy enough to see reina go when he done it to perch. Just don't think it was 'prepostrous'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 He pushed his forehead into another player, how is it not a red card? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Alberto2005 Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 And god dammit someone change my bloody username! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ujpest doza Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? I think Remy reacted in the 1st place to a kick across his mid riff. It was a soft red for both of them but still think it was right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KDT Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 And god dammit someone change my bloody username! Due to your recent record can we not just change it to Joe Kinnear and have a small hope that he's off too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Beren Posted January 30, 2014 Share Posted January 30, 2014 Unfortunately the FA will say Remy was being aggressive toward another player, same for Johnson. It's nonsense but i bet they hide behind it. I'm not sure of the exact terms in the current laws but 'adopting an aggressive stance' is a booking and not a red card. The reason he sent off Remy is because he thought he struck the opponent with his head, and I don't think he did that at all. I've no idea why Johnson was given the straight red but if they conclude he has simulated the head-butt, then that's two bookable offences in the incident. I only saw the game online so the picture quality wasn't great but did Remy actually make a forward motion with his head, or was it all just part of squaring up? Even if the FA can't identify any evidence of Remy moving his head foward after they'd square up, they'll stand behind their ref (at least publicly) and say the red was for the two-handed push, or professional misconduct or some bollocks. Shocked if it gets turned over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now