Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Its not about the lack of thrashings to me.... its that we constantly sit back and absorb pressure allowing teams to get back into the game instead of killing them off.

 

Scoring loads isn't the only way to do that, keeping the ball is one and not allowing the opposition to get forward with regularity.

 

I would understand being as cautious as we are against the bigger teams but not against Norwich.

 

I really wish he would learn from it but i doubt it some how.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Worth pointing out that the football this season really hasn't been too much like the 5th season. In my opinion, at least. We're using the ball a lot better, and working for our goals. The whole 'relying on an in form striker' doesn't hold much weight when we're creating more than enough chances for any decent striker to find form.

 

Agree to a point, our football is much better. Remy is very important though & we are relying on his basic ability/movement to an extent.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest icemanblue

But he's our player. It's what we're meant to do with him. There'd be a lot of criticism if we weren't playing to his strengths, and he wasn't scoring.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I agree, he fits how we're trying to play nicely. Just pointing out that his basic ability is the reason many of these chances exist, we might not have seen some of them as chances with another player.

 

Your avatar contains two "If we didn't have.." players at some points over the last few seasons  :razz:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Aye, it's funny how the argument "if Remy/Ben Arfa/Cabaye/Krul etc hadn't been playing" can be used to justify a point.

If that Hitler bloke hadn't been in the National Socialist party................

 

Yes?

 

Please, go on...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest bimpy474

I just wish our football,  which is undoubtedly better than it has been under this manager, could be sustainable over more than 45 minutes. That's really the major point of criticism.

 

Well it is a bit unfair of our opponents to change their approach because we go in front of them. Dastardly bastards.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Had we not fucked up against 2 of hull, wham or the mackems we'd be second.  :lol:

 

I can get why people are calling for some leeway ATM, I understand that, but those who are shouldn't dismiss those royally pissed at him for those games (plus a full season of performances which nearly saw us go down) Norwich was a shot away from being another to the list. The performances do matter, both halves, things won't go our way and points will be lost, right now that isn't the case.

 

We need to turn up for two halves against west brom, anything less will be dropped points. I'm also hoping there was something in his admittance his ht team talk was a factor in us playing shite second half.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. :lol:

 

 

 

 

even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. :lol:

 

 

 

 

even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form?

 

Are you for real? Shearer was there before SBR but we wasn't finishing 3rd until SBR came and added Bellamy and Robert etc etc.

 

Shearer is probably my favourite ever player, but SBR wasn't f*cked without him not even close.

 

Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. :lol:

 

 

 

 

even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form?

 

Are you for real? Shearer was there before SBR but we wasn't finishing 3rd until SBR came and added Bellamy and Robert etc etc.

 

Shearer is probably my favourite ever player, but SBR wasn't f*cked without him not even close.

 

Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that.

 

take shearers goals out or some of them seasons, when we finished 11th and we would have struggled.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. :lol:

 

 

 

 

even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form?

 

Are you for real? Shearer was there before SBR but we wasn't finishing 3rd until SBR came and added Bellamy and Robert etc etc.

 

Shearer is probably my favourite ever player, but SBR wasn't f*cked without him not even close.

 

Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that.

When did Mole turn heel?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. :lol:

 

 

 

 

even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form?

 

Nah, would have done him some good. Might have forced the stubborn get to play Kluivert alongside Bellamy once in a while. :D

Link to post
Share on other sites

Tbf Shearer wasn't exactly in a rich vein of form when SBR came in, he was responsible for getting him playing again and utilising him in a way Gullit couldn't. So that's a moot point!

 

Can't complain about the results this season, just a couple of horrific displays. We keep playing as one half wonders though and we'll come unstuck sooner rather than later.

Link to post
Share on other sites

the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years.

 

 

Bobby turned Shearer back into an in for striker, I don't know why you've brought those two into this.  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...