Incognito Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 I just wish our football, which is undoubtedly better than it has been under this manager, could be sustainable over more than 45 minutes. That's really the major point of criticism. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 I just wish our football, which is undoubtedly better than it has been under this manager, could be sustainable over more than 45 minutes. That's really the major point of criticism. Well it is a bit unfair of our opponents to change their approach because we go in front of them. Dastardly bastards. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 If we could sustain performances like the 1st half, then I'd be happy with that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Had we not fucked up against 2 of hull, wham or the mackems we'd be second. I can get why people are calling for some leeway ATM, I understand that, but those who are shouldn't dismiss those royally pissed at him for those games (plus a full season of performances which nearly saw us go down) Norwich was a shot away from being another to the list. The performances do matter, both halves, things won't go our way and points will be lost, right now that isn't the case. We need to turn up for two halves against west brom, anything less will be dropped points. I'm also hoping there was something in his admittance his ht team talk was a factor in us playing shite second half. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Haris Vuckic Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mole_Toonfan Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form? Are you for real? Shearer was there before SBR but we wasn't finishing 3rd until SBR came and added Bellamy and Robert etc etc. Shearer is probably my favourite ever player, but SBR wasn't f*cked without him not even close. Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form? Are you for real? Shearer was there before SBR but we wasn't finishing 3rd until SBR came and added Bellamy and Robert etc etc. Shearer is probably my favourite ever player, but SBR wasn't f*cked without him not even close. Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that. take shearers goals out or some of them seasons, when we finished 11th and we would have struggled. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form? Are you for real? Shearer was there before SBR but we wasn't finishing 3rd until SBR came and added Bellamy and Robert etc etc. Shearer is probably my favourite ever player, but SBR wasn't f*cked without him not even close. Absolutely ludicrous to suggest that. When did Mole turn heel? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Most managers in our history have been ''limited'' or ''not good enough''. even one of our very best, SBR, would have been fked without Shearer, so was he lucky to have this one striker in form? Nah, would have done him some good. Might have forced the stubborn get to play Kluivert alongside Bellamy once in a while. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest bimpy474 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Mole man gone mental http://i0.kym-cdn.com/photos/images/original/000/531/722/9f7.gif Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tooj Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Tbf Shearer wasn't exactly in a rich vein of form when SBR came in, he was responsible for getting him playing again and utilising him in a way Gullit couldn't. So that's a moot point! Can't complain about the results this season, just a couple of horrific displays. We keep playing as one half wonders though and we'll come unstuck sooner rather than later. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. Bobby turned Shearer back into an in for striker, I don't know why you've brought those two into this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mick Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Nah, would have done him some good. Might have forced the stubborn get to play Kluivert alongside Bellamy once in a while. The stubborn get might have played Kluivert alongside Bellamy once in a while if he didn't get sacked a month after Kluivert signed for us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. Bobby turned Shearer back into an in for striker, I don't know why you've brought those two into this. without bobby shearer was finished? give over. my point stands, you cant diminish the results of a manager just because hes lucky to have an inform striker. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. Bobby turned Shearer back into an in for striker, I don't know why you've brought those two into this. Now if Pardew somehow got Cisse scoring regularly again for us, then it would be a valid argument. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. Bobby turned Shearer back into an in for striker, I don't know why you've brought those two into this. without bobby shearer was finished? give over. my point stands, you cant diminish the results of a manager just because hes lucky to have an inform striker. He was never finished, his game had to be changed, his legs were old and tired and he couldn't play the same anymore, SBR got the best out of him and turned him from becoming bang average to prolific again. No one said he was finished? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BottledDog Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 Nah, would have done him some good. Might have forced the stubborn get to play Kluivert alongside Bellamy once in a while. The stubborn get might have played Kluivert alongside Bellamy once in a while if he didn't get sacked a month after Kluivert signed for us. Excuses, excuses. His dropping of Shearer against Villa was actually seen as the final straw by some. Ridiculous. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. You'll change your mind about him again in a month or so. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. You'll change your mind about him again in a month or so. is he too negative when we take a lead -yes. Is he a bottling cunt against the Mackems - yes. Would I have him sacked after the derbies-yes. Is he doing well with results, right now-yes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. Bobby turned Shearer back into an in for striker, I don't know why you've brought those two into this. without bobby shearer was finished? give over. my point stands, you cant diminish the results of a manager just because hes lucky to have an inform striker. No-one 's attempting to 'diminish results'. The discussion is almost always about coaching strategy, effectiveness of the team over a long period and sustainability. Every manager in the world would have been considerably worse off without Shearer than with him. Your point is rubbish. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. You'll change your mind about him again in a month or so. is he too negative when we take a lead -yes. Is he a bottling cunt against the Mackems - yes. Would I have him sacked after the derbies-yes. Is he doing well with results, right now-yes Will you change tack again when the results do, yes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cp40 Posted November 24, 2013 Share Posted November 24, 2013 the point I was making, and is valid. Is this thing about Pardew being lucky to have an inform striker this season, can be applied to countless managers and teams down the years. You'll change your mind about him again in a month or so. is he too negative when we take a lead -yes. Is he a bottling cunt against the Mackems - yes. Would I have him sacked after the derbies-yes. Is he doing well with results, right now-yes Will you change tack again when the results do, yes. Will you aknowledge he has done well getting three wins? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts