Cookie1892 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 it gets worse and worse for that fucking cretinous club ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D ;D :idiot2: :idiot2: :idiot2: :idiot2: :idiot2: Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Johnson is now crying in the dock has he gives his final words to the jury in evidence. His face is red and he is sniffing. 1m poor lad Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 He going down tonight? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
STM Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Depends on jury dunnit. Can imagine a quick decision. What's he looking at minimum? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Foluwashola Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Depends on jury dunnit. Can imagine a quick decision. What's he looking at minimum? Think he's willing to go down to 6-7 depending on bone structure. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Depends on jury dunnit. Can imagine a quick decision. What's he looking at minimum? Johnson has no minimum number hahahahahaaha Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SEMTEX Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 why havent they tweeted details of his penis Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 He going down tonight? "Defence case will continue after lunch." Guess not Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 http://www.theguardian.com/uk-news/2016/feb/24/adam-johnson-quizzed-in-court-over-googling-age-of-consent One of The Guardian's main stories regarding Sunderland now up Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stal Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 why havent they tweeted details of his penis tattoos take time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
John P Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Lee Ryder is just preparing to tweet that there's nothing in it any time now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Lee Ryder is just preparing to tweet that there's nothing in it any time now. "According to my club sources at the club who have told me, there's nothing concrete in the Johnson case about Johnson right now" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 It's clear that Sunderland were desperately hoping this would 'go away' so credit to the girl and her family cos I would bet she has received incentives to drop the case Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stal Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Lee Ryder is just preparing to tweet that there's nothing in it any time now. "According to my club sources at the club who have told me, there's nothing concrete in the Johnson case about Johnson right now" lol outstanding! Another quick question, are any of our forum legally qualified? Been reading some of the explanations given to questions on here and it's been rather enlightening, with some really good answers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Lee Ryder is just preparing to tweet that there's nothing in it any time now. "According to my club sources at the club who have told me, there's nothing concrete in the Johnson case about Johnson right now" lol outstanding! Another quick question, are any of our forum legally qualified? Been reading some of the explanations given to questions on here and it's been rather enlightening, with some really good answers. Not sure any of this board are legally qualified but they could have done a better job than Johnson's legal team Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 He hasn't half threw sunderland and Byrne under the bus Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stal Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Lee Ryder is just preparing to tweet that there's nothing in it any time now. "According to my club sources at the club who have told me, there's nothing concrete in the Johnson case about Johnson right now" lol outstanding! Another quick question, are any of our forum legally qualified? Been reading some of the explanations given to questions on here and it's been rather enlightening, with some really good answers. Not sure any of this board are legally qualified but they could have done a better job than Johnson's legal team Ha, could well be true but he hasn't given them much to work with. I think when it gets to such a point as this then the legal team have to just hold his hand and make sure the law is followed correctly and fairly. The board who governs ethics for lawyers would come down on them quite harshly if Johnson has admitted guilt to them and they attempted to get him off. That's different from putting out a defence for his actions though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. Got grief for this yesterday. But are we sure the club haven't broken any laws? It's getting worse by the day. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 It may not have broken any rules but its all about ethics and morality Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sbnufc Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. Got grief for this yesterday. But are we sure the club haven't broken any laws? It's getting worse by the day. Surely it'd be the police who have legal responsibility to stop him from playing? And they obviously didnt see it necessary Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 What laws could they have broke? Unless not playing football was a requirement of his bail I cannot see how anything the club would have done was wrong legally. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Are the chronicle not allowed to talk about the Johnson story? Just had a quick look and couldn't see any updates from them about the case. Plenty of nothing stories about their keeper and upcoming refs etc though Lee Ryder is just preparing to tweet that there's nothing in it any time now. "According to my club sources at the club who have told me, there's nothing concrete in the Johnson case about Johnson right now" Lee Ryder @lee_ryder 12h hours ago Hearing rumors that a sunderland player might be in a spot of bother with the law. My sources tell me there's nothing in it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ketsbaia Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 What laws could they have broke? Unless not playing football was a requirement of his bail I cannot see how anything the club would have done was wrong legally. A woman in a high position knew everything, saw all the evidence. The club can't hide behind her, surely. If she's at fault therefore the club are at fault. No ideas about laws etc but surely this is more than just morally wrong. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted February 24, 2016 Share Posted February 24, 2016 Byrne is in trouble. The club has been completely exposed here, they should count themselves very lucky if they escape punishment. Got grief for this yesterday. But are we sure the club haven't broken any laws? It's getting worse by the day. I can't think how they will have broken any law because they will not be legally bound to disclose evidence such as this but from a morality perspective it's bottom of the swamp Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts