joeyt Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 should change their name to sunderloand Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wallsendmag Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 should change their name to sunderloand It's this policy that's got them in the bother they're in, on the pitch and financially. Always looking for the quick fix, whether that be chopping and changing managers all the time, filling up their squad with loan players or paying top dollar for players well past their best who are really only after one last big pay day. Long May it continue. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Love RTG's insistence on it being called ponteland airport, of all the things to be bitter about Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sima Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 It's not even in Ponteland as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordiesteve710 Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 http://www.readytogo.net/smb/threads/mags-spending-loads.1121227/ Apperantly we must be breaking FFP now Please tell me they're doing that thing where as a forum they e-mail the FA en mass in order to bring something to their attention and "get something done about us." E.g. Remy's appeal against suspension before the derby, trying for a points deduction because some tit hit a horse outside the ground etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Love RTG's insistence on it being called ponteland airport, of all the things to be bitter about Woolsington they it, isn't it? That was until they realised that Sunderland council own slightly more of it than Newcastle council. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleazy Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 No its Woolsington which IS part of Newcastle. Crazy how they have convinced themselves it isnt despite all the proof needed being easily available: http://i23.photobucket.com/albums/b357/sleazycome/airport.jpg Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 sunderland council own more of Newcastle airport than Newcastle council? Sorry, what's all this about? What are the mackems claiming? I've missed all this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 sunderland council own more of Newcastle airport than Newcastle council? Sorry, what's all this about? What are the mackems claiming? I've missed all this. Aye, they own like 1% more than Newcastle. Local councils own a stake in the airport, a total of either 49% or 51%. Each council owns a % in relation to their population. Because Newcastle only includes the city centre, the west end, and limited parts around the city centre, with North Tyneside, Northumberland, Gateshead, and South Tyneide all taking away from Newcastle's true population. Sunderland meanwhile accounts for the population of the whole of Wearside and parts of Durham. At the time of sharing the shares of the airport out this give Sunderland a higher population than Newcastle, although we all know that's not the case. As a result Sunderland council gained a slightly higher percentage of shares of Newcastle airport. Since then Newcastle's population on it's own has now surpassed Sunderland's. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
1964 Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 sunderland council own more of Newcastle airport than Newcastle council? Sorry, what's all this about? What are the mackems claiming? I've missed all this. Aye, they own like 1% more than Newcastle. Local councils own a stake in the airport, a total of either 49% or 51%. Each council owns a % in relation to their population. Because Newcastle only includes the city centre, the west end, and limited parts around the city centre, with North Tyneside, Northumberland, Gateshead, and South Tyneide all taking away from Newcastle's true population. Sunderland meanwhile accounts for the population of the whole of Wearside and parts of Durham. At the time of sharing the shares of the airport out this give Sunderland a higher population than Newcastle, although we all know that's not the case. As a result Sunderland council gained a slightly higher percentage of shares of Newcastle airport. Since then Newcastle's population on it's own has now surpassed Sunderland's. It's called economic migration. They are granted asylum as a humanitarian act Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Sho Time Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 sunderland council own more of Newcastle airport than Newcastle council? Sorry, what's all this about? What are the mackems claiming? I've missed all this. Aye, they own like 1% more than Newcastle. Local councils own a stake in the airport, a total of either 49% or 51%. Each council owns a % in relation to their population. Because Newcastle only includes the city centre, the west end, and limited parts around the city centre, with North Tyneside, Northumberland, Gateshead, and South Tyneide all taking away from Newcastle's true population. Sunderland meanwhile accounts for the population of the whole of Wearside and parts of Durham. At the time of sharing the shares of the airport out this give Sunderland a higher population than Newcastle, although we all know that's not the case. As a result Sunderland council gained a slightly higher percentage of shares of Newcastle airport. Since then Newcastle's population on it's own has now surpassed Sunderland's. Chlorophyll? More like borophyll. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Spurious rumours they are after Austin. Thought they were pink lint. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Klaus Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Turned the mags down marra. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stifler Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 They have said that they have to sell before they buy, all realistic links have been loans, and they are going to spend £15m on Austin, yeah right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KaKa Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Could see a Defoe - Austin swap go down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Could see a Defoe - Austin swap go down. I pity the Charlie. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 sunderland council own more of Newcastle airport than Newcastle council? Sorry, what's all this about? What are the mackems claiming? I've missed all this. Aye, they own like 1% more than Newcastle. Local councils own a stake in the airport, a total of either 49% or 51%. Each council owns a % in relation to their population. Because Newcastle only includes the city centre, the west end, and limited parts around the city centre, with North Tyneside, Northumberland, Gateshead, and South Tyneide all taking away from Newcastle's true population. Sunderland meanwhile accounts for the population of the whole of Wearside and parts of Durham. At the time of sharing the shares of the airport out this give Sunderland a higher population than Newcastle, although we all know that's not the case. As a result Sunderland council gained a slightly higher percentage of shares of Newcastle airport. Since then Newcastle's population on it's own has now surpassed Sunderland's. Interesting, cheers! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Funny how two bad defeats and no signings all window and all of a sudden they are going to make moves for decent players. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Leazes1986 Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Think the Austin rumour has came from the hoax link going around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stray Mackem Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Spurious rumours they are after Austin. Thought they were pink lint. If we get him I'll walk to London to collect him. Although another striker would be a great addition it shouldn't be our priority. After what I watched on Saturday a creative midfielder and a left back who actually knows how defend above the ability of a 9 year old would be a start. Oh..... and a central defender that isn't in his forties. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
DJ_NUFC Posted August 20, 2015 Share Posted August 20, 2015 Your last two sentences almost make you sound like a mag. Join the club, the north east currently leading the country in importing goals left, right and centre. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paully Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 http://www.itv.com/news/2015-08-21/sunderland-boss-advocaat-puts-entire-squad-up-for-sale-after-poor-start-to-season/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sempuki Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 http://www.itv.com/news/2015-08-21/sunderland-boss-advocaat-puts-entire-squad-up-for-sale-after-poor-start-to-season/ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 Would be superb if someone like Lens turned around and said he wants off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted August 21, 2015 Share Posted August 21, 2015 I love a good squad for sale meltdown. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts