Jump to content

NUFC transfer rumours in the press


Recommended Posts

I used to like Bent, was very limited with his general play and the fact he couldn't pair up with anyone but if you gave him a chance he'd usually take it. Problem is we aren't the most creative team and if his recent form is anything to go by he has lost his only attribute.

 

We need a forward who can score goals from half chances, a Ba, a (first half a season) Cisse or a Remy. We'll be lucky to get that and with Pardew's style/tendency to not play players in their actual positions next season has disaster written all over it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Also he has no motivation whatsoever.

 

We are talking about a man who has no hope playing for England again, no chance of competing for any major honours and has done nothing for an entire season.

 

I can't see how this would be anything more than a last pay day for him and a total disaster for us.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 07:45, SanToon said:

:thup: makes no sense at all basically.

 

Unless your Pards and it makes perfect sense.

 

he's worked with bent before right? seems to me like he's looking for allies in the dressing room.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If villa wanted to give him away for nothing, and bent himself was ready to be paid Shola wages, then I wouldn't be against it. But even with that said you'd hope for much much better and a future, which he hasn't got.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 08:02, sh74 said:

Can't see it meself like,its totally against chubsters age transfer policy but then again so was loan signings.

 

I don't think the transfer policy has anything against players over 30, it's more about value for money.  If we could get Bent for a low enough price and if he accepted vastly reduced wages then he might be considered value for money.  He's not going to have any resale value but I'm not sure that necessarily matters.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 08:28, ikri said:

  Quote

Can't see it meself like,its totally against chubsters age transfer policy but then again so was loan signings.

 

I don't think the transfer policy has anything against players over 30, it's more about value for money.  If we could get Bent for a low enough price and if he accepted vastly reduced wages then he might be considered value for money.  He's not going to have any resale value but I'm not sure that necessarily matters.

 

Agreed, we still need players and although it would be nice (for the board) for them to have potential resale profit those types normally cost a fair amount in the first place.

 

If Bent was very cheap and willing to accept reasonable wages I have no doubt they would consider it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

Wouldn't bent just be another Cisse though, incompatible in playing in a partnership with others and does fuck all apart from try and score goals?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 09:05, neesy111 said:

Wouldn't bent just be another Cisse though, incompatible in playing in a partnership with others and does fuck all apart from try and score goals?

 

well yeah, but cisse is injured so we need another right winger man

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 07:44, r0cafella said:

Also he has no motivation whatsoever.

 

We are talking about a man who has no hope playing for England again, no chance of competing for any major honours and has done nothing for an entire season.

 

I can't see how this would be anything more than a last pay day for him and a total disaster for us.

 

perfectly suited to us then

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 08:14, Toon's Taylor said:
If villa wanted to give him away for nothing, and bent himself was ready to be paid Shola wages, then I wouldn't be against it.

 

Happy to sign sub-par players as long as they're cheap?

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 07:49, SanToon said:

At Charlton I think? Yeah and Shelvey.

 

Yep. It's obvious he wants to surround himself with Jelliott-type yes men.

Link to post
Share on other sites

  On 17/05/2014 at 10:06, sempuki said:

 

Daft fee that, must only be mentioned because Roma have some cash now after the Osvaldo, Lamela and Marquinhos sales. I could really see coming good under Garcia like

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...