Manchester United

[SteV]

3 minutes ago, Turnbull2000 said:

 

Liverpool beat them 7-0 last year. Been some hilarious scorelines ,but the fuckers could still finish above us and bag a trophy this season.

 

Yeah, it’s not the worst result they’ve ever had in the PL obviously, but watching it, they were so devoid of anything positive, it felt like that was actually the worst I can ever remember seeing them.

[Kid Icarus]

In a way they've benefitted from being consistently shit. When they were brilliant the thrashings they suffered had more impact  

 

 

Edited May 6, 2024 by Kid Icarus

[Rod]

Froggy, are your team shit because of the injuries?  Or, like I've been telling you all season is Ten Bob an absolute crap manager?

[Shays Given Tim Flowers]

[Pata]

On 31/05/2023 at 18:19, Froggy said:

 

Antony does have 15 goal involvements himself this season. I'd give him more a bit more time than one season though.

 

 

 

[Pata]

22 minutes ago, Rod said:

Froggy, are your team shit because of the injuries?  Or, like I've been telling you all season is Ten Bob an absolute crap manager?

 

[Mazzy]

3 hours ago, SteV said:

Their worst performance of the PL era tonight?

 

Worst performance I think is a definite possibility. Not the worst result though. Especially considering how good Palace have been recently.

[Ronson333]

?

 

 

[ToonCanuck]

 just saw the score    

[r0cafella]

It’s all good, the sporting director they’ve appointed in a professional manner will sort it, oh wait…

[Guest]

We'll be playing our 3rd choice RB at CB against them so should be a level playing field for them anyway.

[James]

14 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said:

We'll be playing our 3rd choice RB at CB against them so should be a level playing field for them anyway.

what was our League Cup team again?

[Guest]

1 minute ago, James said:

what was our League Cup team again?

 

It's for when their fans and Froggy bring out the injury card next week. 

[r0cafella]

 @Froggy how are things looking on the FFP front? Seems you need a bit of a rebuild. 

[Ben]

[Guest]

All this shit should be in not worth of a thread. 

[RodneyCisse]

13 minutes ago, OCK said:

All this shit should be in not worth of a thread. 

Aye like Man U.

[NG32]

Not sure what these lot are doing on the training pitch, absolutely honking the league out. 

 

 

[nufcjmc]

I am not a man u fan at all but most would agree having personnel missing effects how you play.

To have to play a midfield player in defense must be a nightmare try winning games with longstaff as your CB?

I admit I didn't watch the game and assume it's not the only reason for the loss but to not have a consistent back line can work out OK (did for us with lascelles for botman then BDB for lascelles) but I wonder if we would have faired as well with dummett and Ritchie in the back starting games or as mentioning dropping a midfielder in the back. 

I sorta feel sorry for them but massively benefits us so I can't feel too sorry for them. 

 

 

Edited May 7, 2024 by nufcjmc

[healthyaddiction]

4 minutes ago, nufcjmc said:

I am not a man u fan at all but most would agree having personnel missing effects how you play.

To have to play a midfield player in defense must be a nightmare try winning games with longstaff as your CB?

I admit I didn't watch the game and assume it's not the only reason for the loss but to not have a consistent back line can work out OK (did for us with lascelles for botman then BDB for lascelles) but I wonder if we would have faired as well with dummett and Ritchie in the back starting games or as mentioning dropping a midfielder in the back. 

I sorta feel sorry for them but massively benefits us so I can't feel too sorry for them. 

 

 

 

They're missing 3 centre backs and 2 full backs. We're no missing 3 centre backs and two full backs. I think you're being for too kind to them.

[SteV]

1 hour ago, nufcjmc said:

I am not a man u fan at all but most would agree having personnel missing effects how you play.

To have to play a midfield player in defense must be a nightmare try winning games with longstaff as your CB?

I admit I didn't watch the game and assume it's not the only reason for the loss but to not have a consistent back line can work out OK (did for us with lascelles for botman then BDB for lascelles) but I wonder if we would have faired as well with dummett and Ritchie in the back starting games or as mentioning dropping a midfielder in the back. 

I sorta feel sorry for them but massively benefits us so I can't feel too sorry for them. 

 

 

 

Unlike ETH, Eddie wouldn’t be stupid enough to put a midfielder at CB.

 

Just play Dalot or Wan-Bissaka there and stick someone else at full-back. Surely much better to have a major weakness there than at CB?

[NG32]

1 hour ago, nufcjmc said:

I am not a man u fan at all but most would agree having personnel missing effects how you play.

To have to play a midfield player in defense must be a nightmare try winning games with longstaff as your CB?

I admit I didn't watch the game and assume it's not the only reason for the loss but to not have a consistent back line can work out OK (did for us with lascelles for botman then BDB for lascelles) but I wonder if we would have faired as well with dummett and Ritchie in the back starting games or as mentioning dropping a midfielder in the back. 

I sorta feel sorry for them but massively benefits us so I can't feel too sorry for them. 

 

 

 

They've got issues like everyone else but they just look disjointed all over the pitch. Its like watching a Steve Bruce set up, half arsed and lazy. 

[mush]

Mad that they're potentially stuck with Casemiro for the next 2 years. He looks finished

[r0cafella]

2 minutes ago, mush said:

Mad that they're potentially stuck with Casemiro for the next 2 years. He looks finished

They are now multi club so they or they were smart they’d just dump him on Nice. 

[54]

They gave a 31 year old Casemiro a 4 year contract, @Froggy the fuck where your guys thinking?