Jump to content

Recommended Posts

That Graeme Bailey guy (who seemed to have some good info on transfers over the summer) has tweeted that Pardew is one heavy defeat away from the sack.

 

:lol: Then just sack him now, we're guaranteed to get fucking rocked at least twice this season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

 

by legal action, i meant a lgeal letter and demand of an apology.

 

pretty much what they´ve done to the telegraph today, and to others in the past.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You just know if he leaves we'll get Carver, Beardsley, or Kinnear

 

i dont think we will, i think we´ll get an improvement, he wont risk us going down again. Todays statement is a positive in terms of pardew, and a new manager is concerned, imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You just know if he leaves we'll get Carver, Beardsley, or Kinnear

 

i dont think we will, i think we´ll get an improvement, he wont risk us going down again. Todays statement is a positive in terms of pardew, and a new manager is concerned, imo.

 

Personally I don't think Ashley will go on the open market for a manger.  His tendency has generally been to appoint somebody he already knows well.

Link to post
Share on other sites

You just know if he leaves we'll get Carver, Beardsley, or Kinnear

 

i dont think we will, i think we´ll get an improvement, he wont risk us going down again. Todays statement is a positive in terms of pardew, and a new manager is concerned, imo.

 

Personally I don't think Ashley will go on the open market for a manger.  His tendency has generally been to appoint somebody he already knows well.

 

keegan? shearer? he didnt know either of those well.

 

he´ll go for someone who will work under his blueprint, of spending nowt (net).

 

i still think it´ll be the french fella, moyes or bruce.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I don't even think it's ego per se with him. I just think he's a downtrodden, insecure gimp try trying to con himself into delusions of success.

 

from the stories you hear he's got a massive ego problem though no?

 

 

I think it's just him acting as if. There's no ego big enough on the planet to withstand getting sacked from Championship and League One clubs and still come out with the rubbish he does. It's pretence and self-delusion.

 

Your last sentence doesn't go far enough. I actually think he's mentally ill - there is a great deal of evidence to back up this (semi-)amateur diagnosis.

 

He displays Neuropsychosis, Sociopathy, Narcissistic personality disorder, and others. He's really unwell.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just follow Ashley around the Casino on Saturday night and the bloke that laughs hardest at his jokes, gets him drinks and and basically crawls up his arse that much that it makes you you cringe, will be our next gaffer..................................................shit I've just described pardew.

Link to post
Share on other sites

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

 

by legal action, i meant a lgeal letter and demand of an apology.

 

pretty much what they´ve done to the telegraph today, and to others in the past.

 

Like I said, the Independent story would not have been legally actionable. Sending a lawyers' letter (which would not be sent to a newspaper as it's not in the PCC tariff of complaints) isn't legal action, nor is asking for an apology or even asking for, and getting, a retraction.

 

None of these things have happened. As you correctly observe they just ban newspapers willy-nilly. I maintain this is actually more about money than anything else.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Is Pardew a multimillionaire?

 

Not a chance. He's skint.

 

I don't know what wage he's on but at 5k per week over 4yrs if you make your money work well for you you shouldnt be far off, thats a basic of £260,000 per year (then tax off obviously but they all seem to work with these legal tax avoidance schemes) they certainly won't be paying 40%

Link to post
Share on other sites

After they were beaten 2-0 at home by Newcastle, the players felt Pardew had made the lines of demarcation clear. Some of the players were still squabbling among themselves in the dressing room when the manager walked in and told them to "Shut up and listen to what I have to say".

 

Pardew told them that he was already a millionaire and didn't need to work, but told the players that they "earned £30,000 a week and were only in it for the money".

 

He meant that he was only in football because he loved the game, but his comments were misinterpreted and taken by some of the influential players as a sign of arrogance.

 

:D

Link to post
Share on other sites

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

 

by legal action, i meant a lgeal letter and demand of an apology.

 

pretty much what they´ve done to the telegraph today, and to others in the past.

 

Like I said, the Independent story would not have been legally actionable. Sending a lawyers' letter (which would not be sent to a newspaper as it's not in the PCC tariff of complaints) isn't legal action, nor is asking for an apology or even asking for, and getting, a retraction.

 

None of these things have happened. As you correctly observe they just ban newspapers willy-nilly. I maintain this is actually more about money than anything else.

May have already been said, but don't the club usually take legal action against articles with no substance? Has that been done with the independent article about him having two games?

 

I'm not aware that they've ever taken legal action against any newspaper? They've threatened to but have we seen them in court, and win?

 

As for the Independent article, the newspaper says it 'understands', and carries no direct quotes. Also, as the games in question have yet to take place, how can we ascertain that the article has 'no substance. It's not actionable even if he lasts until 2018.

 

by legal action, i meant a lgeal letter and demand of an apology.

 

pretty much what they´ve done to the telegraph today, and to others in the past.

 

Like I said, the Independent story would not have been legally actionable. Sending a lawyers' letter (which would not be sent to a newspaper as it's not in the PCC tariff of complaints) isn't legal action, nor is asking for an apology or even asking for, and getting, a retraction.

 

None of these things have happened. As you correctly observe they just ban newspapers willy-nilly. I maintain this is actually more about money than anything else.

 

You obviously have a legal background, which I don't. So I'll remove the term legal is at merely a technicality.

 

The course of action they take against newspapers who print stories they deem to be incorrect, hasn't been taken against the journalists /papers who've printed the pardew has two games stories.

 

There's a reason for that, imo.

 

I'm also pretty sure they've taken action in the past when pardew stories gave surfaced.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...