Jump to content

Leicester City 1-0 Newcastle United (FT) - Post Match Reaction from Page 18


BlueStar

Recommended Posts

Guest firetotheworks

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

 

Our football does represent a tragedy though

 

In before Pilko.

 

We started out like Romeo and Juliet but it ended in tragedy.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's the season over with... Though with these two picking the team we will probably flirt with relegation... It got ugly at the end with Carver left in no doubt what we thought of it all...

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

 

2015

 

:lol:

 

Motherfucker, it's got me already.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

 

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/007/666/_57c8a1a431a592af806925e57258202f.png

 

:lol:

 

Extra :lol: for it not even being right.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Well that's the season over with... Though with these two picking the team we will probably flirt with relegation... It got ugly at the end with Carver left in no doubt what we thought of it all...

 

Did he not threaten to chin you?  If not, you got off lightly.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

 

http://i0.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/007/666/_57c8a1a431a592af806925e57258202f.png

wrap it up, KI
Link to post
Share on other sites

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

 

Our football does represent a tragedy though

 

In before Pilko.

 

We started out like Romeo and Juliet but it ended in tragedy.

 

:lol: nice.

Link to post
Share on other sites

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

Why not?
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

 

:lol: this thread is taking ridiculous turns like

 

:lol: Love this place

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

Why not?

 

PAHAHAHAHAHA.

 

Fucking hell.

 

Are you being serious?

Link to post
Share on other sites

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

Why not?

 

PAHAHAHAHAHA.

 

Fucking hell.

 

Are you being serious?

What do you think?
Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

 

:lol: this thread is taking ridiculous turns like tiote

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

Why not?

 

PAHAHAHAHAHA.

 

Fucking hell.

 

Are you being serious?

What do you think?

 

I'd like to hope that you're blatantly taking the piss, but I'm genuinely not sure. If it's a joke then I don't see you're angle, if you're being serious then I don't know where to begin on just how thick of a thing that is to say.

Link to post
Share on other sites

 

In  Shakesperes plays, a Cockney was referred to a  mummy`s boy,an effeminate man.

 

It's 2014, not 1602.

Stop ignoring history man.

 

:lol:

 

What? So I should dislike people because of things that happened hundreds of years ago?

 

:lol: this thread is taking ridiculous turns like

 

:lol: Love this place

 

:thup:  :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since when did 'Cockney' become a derogatory term anyway?

:lol:

 

It's derogatory when sandwiched between with 'fat' and 'b******'.

 

Aye but at least one of those two things is true. Not sure if he's medically fat like.

 

Medically fat.

 

MEDICALLY.

 

 

Aye, and black people are black, that's a fact. As Hans pointed out though it's a different context if it's sandwiched between 'fat' and 'b******' though, isn't it?

 

Introduce race to try and take the moral high ground. Pathetic.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest Open_C

What is going on :lol:

 

This was supposed to be a happy day, Pardew is finally gone and yet people are angrier than ever  :lol:

 

But about different stuff this time, which is nice :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest firetotheworks

Since when did 'Cockney' become a derogatory term anyway?

:lol:

 

It's derogatory when sandwiched between with 'fat' and 'b******'.

 

Aye but at least one of those two things is true. Not sure if he's medically fat like.

 

Medically fat.

 

MEDICALLY.

 

 

Aye, and black people are black, that's a fact. As Hans pointed out though it's a different context if it's sandwiched between 'fat' and 'b******' though, isn't it?

 

Introduce race to try and take the moral high ground. Pathetic.

 

I could introduce anything else mate, it's another example of something out of his control, that's the entire point. You put something in the middle of 'fat' and 'bastard' and it's obviously meant as an insult, it shouldn't need to be explained.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Since when did 'Cockney' become a derogatory term anyway?

:lol:

 

It's derogatory when sandwiched between with 'fat' and 'b******'.

 

Aye but at least one of those two things is true. Not sure if he's medically fat like.

 

Medically fat.

 

MEDICALLY.

 

 

Aye, and black people are black, that's a fact. As Hans pointed out though it's a different context if it's sandwiched between 'fat' and 'b******' though, isn't it?

 

Introduce race to try and take the moral high ground. Pathetic.

It's because it's sandwiched in a list of negatives. Fat bastard. Okay. He probably leads a sedentary lifestyle. His obesity is on him. And he acts in a right bastard way. But he has no control over where he was born, thus the analogy with race because it's outside of his control; it doesn't belong in a list of negatives.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...