RodneyCisse Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 Is a bewk a ghost story? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rich Posted February 9, 2023 Share Posted February 9, 2023 How thick is that lass laughing at him falling over the advertisement when they've just gone 2-0 down? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 8 game ban Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 1 minute ago, bowlingcrofty said: 8 game ban Total or on top of the 3 he would've got for the straight red? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
bowlingcrofty Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 1 minute ago, Nobody said: Total or on top of the 3 he would've got for the straight red? in total Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 Fucking hell Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 Fair enough I reckon Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
healthyaddiction Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 Personally I feel a 3 match ban was enough, really. I feel like there are a lot of incidents that are much worse than Mitro did that get punished less harshly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Paullow Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 (edited) Yeah, about right. Fulham's season is pretty much done anyway, especially after the way they unravelled in the FA Cup. Just 8 points from their last 9 league games, always fairly likely to slip away, won't go down even if they lost every game, won't get into Europe, so just really a top 10 place at stake. Great first season back for them though, and a lot better than most would have expected, but will probably be a boring end to the season for their fans. Edited April 4, 2023 by Paullow Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BoSelecta Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 Yeah, I think that's very harsh, it's not like he swung for him is it. Barely touched him; 5 would have been about right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 3 minutes ago, healthyaddiction said: Personally I feel a 3 match ban was enough, really. I feel like there are a lot of incidents that are much worse than Mitro did that get punished less harshly. Surely it has to be worse than an offence against a player? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 1 minute ago, BoSelecta said: Yeah, I think that's very harsh, it's not like he swung for him is it. Barely touched him; 5 would have been about right. I would have gone for 5 or 6 as well, has to be clearly more than you would get for a normal red. 8 is a lot but it sends the right message. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Matt Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 He got 6 for the push and 2 for verbals in the aftermath. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Yorkie Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 Correct call that he's got a long ban, imo. Nothing to do with him as an individual, his character or his prior disciplinary record: the FA needs to set the example that you can't be aggressively putting your hands on officials. Di Canio got longer for less, imo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 9 minutes ago, BoSelecta said: Yeah, I think that's very harsh, it's not like he swung for him is it. Barely touched him; 5 would have been about right. He shoved him and then continued to square up to him after being given a red card Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 It would be fair if the same rules were applied to all clubs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 Would only be half of that amount if it was Bruno Fernandes. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 6 minutes ago, Kimbo said: It would be fair if the same rules were applied to all clubs. There hasnt been anything like this since Di Canio. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
magvicar Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 His ban can be construed as fair enough only when all other players suffer the very same ban. Bruno Fernandes should've also been banned the same but seeing as he's the untouchable darling for some strange reason, it seems Mitro had to be the benchmark...or will he be the benchmark? Let's see. Mitro was stupid to do what he did and ref's have to be protected by threats of violence or intimidation and a strong message sent...but let's not see cherry picking from this day forward with this stuff. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 4 minutes ago, nufc123 said: There hasnt been anything like this since Di Canio. Bruno Fernandes shoved a linesman. You can argue it wasn’t as bad as Mitrović, but it was certainly worth more than 0 punishment. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlazeT44 Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 No way the Fernandes push was as bad as Mitrovic. I hate Fernandes as much as the next bloke, but it wasn't as bad. The aggression of Mitrovic and the way he leant forward in Kavanagh's face made it far more threatening. As a former referee, you're going to be fearing for your safety far more if a player squares up to your face, pushes/pulls you, invades your space and points at you, launching a tirade of abuse. Compare that to a slight push in the back and you turn to see the player running away... There's zero comparison. That said, Bruno should have been punished in some way post incident. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 31 minutes ago, Kimbo said: Bruno Fernandes shoved a linesman. You can argue it wasn’t as bad as Mitrović, but it was certainly worth more than 0 punishment. He did, but he wasnt agressive, up in the face, chasing the referee ready to go head to head. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 5 minutes ago, nufc123 said: He did, but he wasnt agressive, up in the face, chasing the referee ready to go head to head. So your rule would be "you can push the referee, but don't do it too aggressively and don't go head to head"? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufc123 Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 5 minutes ago, Kimbo said: So your rule would be "you can push the referee, but don't do it too aggressively and don't go head to head"? I just think there is a very big difference between the two. If Fernandes gets a 1 game ban, and Mitro gets 8. Fine. They are not comparable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted April 4, 2023 Share Posted April 4, 2023 I would say 5 for Fernandes, if Mitrovic is worth 8. I'd accept at 4 at a push. He got pissy at the linesman and shoved him in the back, it wasn't hard but there was aggression. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now