Jump to content

Newcastle United 1-0 West Bromwich Albion - Post-match reaction from page 33


Recommended Posts

The linesman must have known they were offside, but might not have known if they were interfering with the flight of the ball. The ref might not have known they were offside, just that the flight of the ball was very close to Mitrovic. Talk to one another = right answer.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The linesman must have known they were way offside, but wouldn't know if they were interfering with the flight of the ball. The ref might not have known they were offside, just that the flight of the ball was very close to Mitrovic. Talk to one another = right answer.

 

fair enough.  O0

Link to post
Share on other sites

The linesman must have known they were offside, but might not have known if they were interfering with the flight of the ball. The ref might not have known they were offside, just that the flight of the ball was very close to Mitrovic. Talk to one another = right answer.

 

Exactly.

 

The commentators were going as if once the linesman chooses not to waive his stick of righteousness in the first 2 seconds after the incident, that's it there's to be no discussion as to whether there's a correct decision to be made.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's shite because foster is never getting to the ball just like Hart wasn't

 

He's a yard away and couldn't see the ball. He might have got a hand.

 

Irrelevant anyway, rules are rules.

Was about 8 yards away like

 

From the ball.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

The linesman must have known they were offside, but might not have known if they were interfering with the flight of the ball. The ref might not have known they were offside, just that the flight of the ball was very close to Mitrovic. Talk to one another = right answer.

Spot on.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The linesman must have known they were offside, but might not have known if they were interfering with the flight of the ball. The ref might not have known they were offside, just that the flight of the ball was very close to Mitrovic. Talk to one another = right answer.

 

Exactly.

 

The commentators were going as if once the linesman chooses not to waive his stick of righteousness in the first 10 seconds after the incident, that's it there's to be no discussion as to whether there's a correct decision to be made.

 

The problem here is that Mitrovic was 6 yards offside. Ref must have seen that, it was so obvious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

The linesman must have known they were offside, but might not have known if they were interfering with the flight of the ball. The ref might not have known they were offside, just that the flight of the ball was very close to Mitrovic. Talk to one another = right answer.

 

Exactly.

 

The commentators were going as if once the linesman chooses not to waive his stick of righteousness in the first 10 seconds after the incident, that's it there's to be no discussion as to whether there's a correct decision to be made.

 

The problem here is that Mitrovic was 6 yards offside. Ref must have seen that, it was so obvious.

The issue was whether mitrovic was interfering, linesman wouldn't be able to tell with side on view.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...