Guest neesy111 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device. Unless… Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's piss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works. Seen it done. It's not piss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print. Wrong. http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/2/11540962/iphone-samsung-fingerprint-duplicate-hack-security Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kaizero Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 It's easy as fuck to trick the iPhone fingerprint scan. They only use partials ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ash Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device. Unless… Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's piss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works. Seen it done. It's not piss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print. Have a day off ffs. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Lavatory requirements? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
loki679 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 After the oven crackdown Stifler's mum now requires fingerprints before he can have a shit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Interpolic Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device. Unless… Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's piss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works. Seen it done. It's not piss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print. Wrong. http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/2/11540962/iphone-samsung-fingerprint-duplicate-hack-security :lol: All that fucking detail, then "Wrong" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 After the oven crackdown Stifler's mum now requires fingerprints before he can have a s***. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Menace Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 This thread man? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Si Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 After the oven crackdown Stifler's mum now requires fingerprints before he can have a s***. If it's a number 2 then a retina scan is also required. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device. Unless… Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's p*ss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works. Seen it done. It's not p*ss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print. Just cut their finger off. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 @Matt5cott: Not sure the media have quite grasped the magnitude of this HMRC investigation. It's the biggest thing to have hit football in the PL era. @Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce. @Matt5cott: Lots and lots of people will be suffering sleepless nights right now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Figures 1-0 Football Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Storm in a teacup. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NG32 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Who is matt scott? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
U2 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Talksport presenter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Who is matt scott? Twitter profile says someone from TalkSport. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I doubt anyone in the media really has a grasp on the size of this, because it's kind of unprecedented. People can make their own assumptions, but there's no reason to get in a nervous wreck when this could easily end in a simple fine by the FA. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Tiresias Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 To be fair i thought he was over egging it, but I think he means there's plenty more to come which I think is reasonable presumption, dodgy transfer dealings, what a shock! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I doubt anyone in the media knows much about it to be honest as investigative bodies tend to not live blog their investigations. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Way to sensationalize something Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Darth Crooks Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 Who is matt scott? Twitter profile says someone from TalkSport. Monty Magpie m8 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 @Matt5cott: Not sure the media have quite grasped the magnitude of this HMRC investigation. It's the biggest thing to have hit football in the PL era. @Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce. @Matt5cott: Lots and lots of people will be suffering sleepless nights right now. Sounds like he hasn't got a clue himself and is just spewing random shit. Allardyce is the common factor! Yeah ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 So, if he's trying to claim he's the smartest man in the media? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 I doubt anyone in the media really has a grasp on the size of this, because it's kind of unprecedented. People can make their own assumptions, but there's no reason to get in a nervous wreck when this could easily end in a simple fine by the FA. Wouldn't surprise anyone if Sam Allardyce is involved in this tbh, good job he drinks wine by the pint glass Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 @Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce. Sounds like he hasn't got a clue himself and is just spewing random shit. Allardyce is the common factor! Yeah ok. 10 years ago Pardew was managing West Ham as well? edit: 11 years ago apparently. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted April 27, 2017 Share Posted April 27, 2017 @Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce. Sounds like he hasn't got a clue himself and is just spewing random shit. Allardyce is the common factor! Yeah ok. 10 years ago Pardew was managing West Ham as well? Just over 10 years ago. Got sacked late 2006 IIRC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now