Jump to content

Recommended Posts

Guest neesy111

Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device.

 

:thup: Unless…

 

security.png

 

 

:lol:

 

Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's piss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works.  Seen it done.

It's not piss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print.

 

Wrong.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/2/11540962/iphone-samsung-fingerprint-duplicate-hack-security

Link to post
Share on other sites

Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device.

 

:thup: Unless…

 

security.png

 

 

:lol:

 

Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's piss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works.  Seen it done.

It's not piss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print.

 

Have a day off ffs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device.

 

:thup: Unless…

 

security.png

 

 

:lol:

 

Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's piss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works.  Seen it done.

It's not piss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print.

 

Wrong.

 

http://www.theverge.com/2016/5/2/11540962/iphone-samsung-fingerprint-duplicate-hack-security

 

:lol: :lol:

 

All that fucking detail, then "Wrong" :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Encryption = 1% of chance of recovering files nowadays without the password for the device.

 

:thup: Unless…

 

security.png

 

 

:lol:

 

Also you use fingerprint on your phone, as it's p*ss easy to get a fingerprint from a glass etc make a mould from it and it usually works.  Seen it done.

It's not p*ss easy. First of all it requires a clean print, something that rarely happens as prints are usually smudged to force and/movement, and then the transfer of the print process. Then it requires a detailed scanner and printer that are usually reserved for lavatory requirements and cost in excess of thousands of pounds. The print also needs to be exactly the same size as the real print as well. Even after all that the print still usually fails, videos of it being done usually omit the whole process including the rejected attempts. Most phones etc all have a limited before which the backup password or code is required. Almost all phones have this backup password or code as an alternative to using the fingerprint which is far easier to break than replicating a finger print.

 

Just cut their finger off.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Matt5cott: Not sure the media have quite grasped the magnitude of this HMRC investigation. It's the biggest thing to have hit football in the PL era.

 

@Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce.

 

@Matt5cott: Lots and lots of people will be suffering sleepless nights right now.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt anyone in the media really has a grasp on the size of this, because it's kind of unprecedented. People can make their own assumptions, but there's no reason to get in a nervous wreck when this could easily end in a simple fine by the FA.

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Matt5cott: Not sure the media have quite grasped the magnitude of this HMRC investigation. It's the biggest thing to have hit football in the PL era.

 

@Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce.

 

@Matt5cott: Lots and lots of people will be suffering sleepless nights right now.

 

 

 

 

Sounds like he hasn't got a clue himself and is just spewing random shit. Allardyce is the common factor! Yeah ok.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I doubt anyone in the media really has a grasp on the size of this, because it's kind of unprecedented. People can make their own assumptions, but there's no reason to get in a nervous wreck when this could easily end in a simple fine by the FA.

Wouldn't surprise anyone if Sam Allardyce is involved in this tbh, good job he drinks wine by the pint glass :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

@Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce.

 

 

Sounds like he hasn't got a clue himself and is just spewing random shit. Allardyce is the common factor! Yeah ok.

10 years ago Pardew was managing West Ham as well?

 

edit: 11 years ago apparently.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest neesy111

@Matt5cott: It dates back 10 years and covers Newcastle and West Ham. Who's the only man to have managed both in that time? Step forward Sam Allardyce.

 

 

Sounds like he hasn't got a clue himself and is just spewing random shit. Allardyce is the common factor! Yeah ok.

10 years ago Pardew was managing West Ham as well?

 

 

 

Just over 10 years ago.  Got sacked late 2006  IIRC.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...