Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

Henderson to Saudi would mean two of the Sky Six taking transfer fees from them. I can't see how that doesn't open the door to us selling to them too. It has to.

 

Salah is still Liverpool's best player. Selling him now actually weakens them, so I would welcome it even if they get Chiesa. Regarding Lavia, the Manchester Evening News reckons City sold him with all manner of buyback clauses, so Liverpool only get him if Pep doesn't want him back. This would mean Pep rating him below Kalvin Phillips. There aren't many examples of Pep-era City letting good players go, Jadon Sancho as the only one that springs to mind.

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/man-city-transfers-romeo-lavia-27277041

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Stottie said:

Henderson to Saudi would mean two of the Sky Six taking transfer fees from them. I can't see how that doesn't open the door to us selling to them too. It has to.

 

Salah is still Liverpool's best player. Selling him now actually weakens them, so I would welcome it even if they get Chiesa. Regarding Lavia, the Manchester Evening News reckons City sold him with all manner of buyback clauses, so Liverpool only get him if Pep doesn't want him back. This would mean Pep rating him below Kalvin Phillips. There aren't many examples of Pep-era City letting good players go, Jadon Sancho as the only one that springs to mind.

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/man-city-transfers-romeo-lavia-27277041

It’s also that Lavia might not want a return. Why re-sign an unhappy player?

 

PIF signing 3 aging Liverpool midfielders would hurt. They’ll replace them with utter class. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The College Dropout said:

It’s also that Lavia might not want a return. Why re-sign an unhappy player?

 

PIF signing 3 aging Liverpool midfielders would hurt. They’ll replace them with utter class. 

Thuram, Szlob and Lavia. All funded by our “totally independent” owners.

Link to post
Share on other sites

15 minutes ago, Stottie said:

Henderson to Saudi would mean two of the Sky Six taking transfer fees from them. I can't see how that doesn't open the door to us selling to them too. It has to.

 

Salah is still Liverpool's best player. Selling him now actually weakens them, so I would welcome it even if they get Chiesa. Regarding Lavia, the Manchester Evening News reckons City sold him with all manner of buyback clauses, so Liverpool only get him if Pep doesn't want him back. This would mean Pep rating him below Kalvin Phillips. There aren't many examples of Pep-era City letting good players go, Jadon Sancho as the only one that springs to mind.

 

https://www.manchestereveningnews.co.uk/sport/football/transfer-news/man-city-transfers-romeo-lavia-27277041

 

:huff::wave:

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Saudi are paying full Transfermarkt prices for declining Sky Six players, we should sell some combination of Murphy, ASM, Targett and Miggy for the same full Transfermarkt prices. 

 

If there are five CL places, the goal should be to finish Top 5, realistically above Villa, Brighton, Chelsea, and Spurs. Finishing above both Liverpool and Man U will not be necessary next season. Liverpool alone improving shouldn't be an issue. If Nunez finds his shooting boots and Diaz regains his form, they won't need a new midfield.

 

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The Prophet said:

Can't wait until they slap in a £60 million bid for Almiron.

 

Wish they'd fucking get on with it then, and I love Miggy but we need to be on the same playing field as the big (s)hitter clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

They’ve got TAA, Macallister, Szobodslai, Elliott, Jones, Thiago (last three are crap or old)

 

doesn’t blow me away that. They might add Lavia or Thuram, but it’s still wholesale changes to that squad, which could take time to gel, or they might flop.
 

No guarantee on anything, or any reason to be jealous. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, brummie said:

Who will they get to replace Fabinho in that role of constantly hacking at opponents, producing clear fouls, only for them to go entirely unpunished by Liverpool loving match officials?

It'll be spread through the rest of the team.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, alexf said:

Liverpool getting 40m for a rapidly declining Fabinho would be highly annoying. 

 

The whole thing pisses me off, every single time I see 'Player X from one of Newcastle's rivals, off to Saudi.'

 

I'd imagine Howe, Ashworth and Nickson would feel the same.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, BonesJones said:

 

The whole thing pisses me off, every single time I see 'Player X from one of Newcastle's rivals, off to Saudi.'

 

I'd imagine Howe, Ashworth and Nickson would feel the same.

 

They probably aren't that arsed.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...