Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

26 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Is Rodrygo injured?I’ve kept half an eye on them pre season. Seems to be starting Vini and Joselu up top. Bellingham at 10. 


Started both games where they were fielding a strong side. Yeah Bellingham at the 10, but see it as temporary until Mbappe is eventually signed and then three of Jude, Cama, Tchouameni, Kroos, Modric and Valverde starting in the midfield three. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Part of me thinks Kane is the dog that caught the van here.

 

I don’t think he wants Bayern, I think he wants out of Spurs but still in the league, that way he gets both the goal record and trophies.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Always assumed German clubs were a bit more savvy finance wise than this. Imagine spending £85m on a 30 year old striker you could get for nothing next season. Levy will be laughing all the way to the bank, that will give him a huge cash pot to spend on appreciating assets.

 

Yes I know Kane is a class player, but I'm just not a fan of throwing that much money at a player who will decline in the next year or two.

Link to post
Share on other sites

This is why Man U beggar belief at times. Goalscoring was their number one problem last season. They spend crazy money on older players anyway (Casemiro) so why not guarantee goals (and probably a title challenge) by getting Kane over Hojlund. 

 

Can't understand that decision - it's only 20M extra - probably tons of wages on top to be fair - but you just got rid of De Gea, Elanga, Maguire, McTominay probably. Don't even need to replace any of those - frees up plenty of wages. 


Can guarantee Ferguson would have demanded him, he bought RVP at age 30 too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, kingxlnc said:

This is why Man U beggar belief at times. Goalscoring was their number one problem last season. They spend crazy money on older players anyway (Casemiro) so why not guarantee goals (and probably a title challenge) by getting Kane over Hojlund. 

 

Can't understand that decision - it's only 20M extra - probably tons of wages on top to be fair - but you just got rid of De Gea, Elanga, Maguire, McTominay probably. Don't even need to replace any of those - frees up plenty of wages. 


Can guarantee Ferguson would have demanded him, he bought RVP at age 30 too. 


Maybe Spurs were asking for more from a league rival?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Kane is also a way better player than Owen and other pure finishers/poachers. Kane drops deep, has amazing passing too - could even be a CAM if goals slow down as he's very creative with the ball too. 

 

It's a good thing as I think Hojlund will have a Darwin Nunez-esque season, some promise and some stinkers too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Spurs lads reckon Levy will not sell Kane to Man U. Dunno if Kane could force it by rejecting both Bayern and a new contract. That would of course be a massive, burn his bridges with Spurs move.

 

The potential ace up the sleeve here is that Spurs could offer him a huge-money, multiyear deal on the assumption, or possibly even pre-agreement, that he buggers off to Saudi when its no longer value for money for them. If "we can just dump him on Saudi" is an option, a megacontract would not have the normal potential millstone type risk.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, mighty__mag said:

I'm a bit puzzled what City are looking for with Paqueta? Is this another filler type signing, like Phillips, or do they see real potential to start him or perhaps replace Bernardo/Mahrez.


Paqueta is twice the player Philips is tbh. I think they’re looking for him to fill in for De Bruyne when injured/rested more than anything.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Flip said:


Paqueta is twice the player Philips is tbh. I think they’re looking for him to fill in for De Bruyne when injured/rested more than anything.

 

I wasn't comparing the two, both totally different, Phillips was high profile at the time, but city on occasions do make squad filler signings, even at expense. 

 

I'm not sure he could do the job of a KDB who literally dictates the game for City, I think if Bernardo leaves then it could make sense he plays a part. 

 

Who knows? City have someone the best scouts around. They've obviously identified him for a role if reports are true.

 

I'm more worried they'd use him to attract Bruno their next [emoji38]

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, mighty__mag said:

 

I wasn't comparing the two, both totally different, Phillips was high profile at the time, but city on occasions do make squad filler signings, even at expense. 

 

I'm not sure he could do the job of a KDB who literally dictates the game for City, I think if Bernardo leaves then it could make sense he plays a part. 

 

Who knows? City have someone the best scouts around. They've obviously identified him for a role if reports are true.

 

I'm more worried they'd use him to attract Bruno their next [emoji38]


No one’s ever going to do what De Bruyne does for them, but I think he could offer something different when Kevin is injured or resting. He’s a talented player and hopefully Pep can get the best out of him. At times he has been fantastic for the national side, just very inconsistent which is something he can afford to be for City given their depth. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Like he coped with the pace and strength of the league. Put his foot in. And when West Ham had the ball, he was silky. He’s not Tonali off the ball but he held his own. 
 

I’ve realised - Howe doesn’t love that profile of player.  He’s more Klopp than Guardiola. Moyes than Ten Hag.  He ranks physicality super high. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The College Dropout said:

Like he coped with the pace and strength of the league. Put his foot in. And when West Ham had the ball, he was silky. He’s not Tonali off the ball but he held his own. 
 

I’ve realised - Howe doesn’t love that profile of player.  He’s more Klopp than Guardiola. Moyes than Ten Hag.  He ranks physicality super high. 

Please don’t disrespect wor Eddie by mentioning inferior managers in the same sentence as him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...