Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Greg

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, leffe186 said:


The article mentions that clause and basically says Liverpool are going to pretend to not be loaning him:

“Valencia will bank £34 million. Liverpool are due to pay £30 million, with that final £4 million a loan fee stumped up via Bournemouth.”

 

if true surely that’s a blatant and transparent attempt to subvert the rule which should be knocked on the head.

 

 

 


I don’t get it. If Bournemouth are paying the loan fee to Liverpool then that makes it no different to any other loan. If they’re paying it to Valencia then they’re paying a loan fee to a club that won’t own him.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd love it if he was an absolute car crash of a keeper this season and Liverpool have to buy him regardless.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know we likely couldn’t compete with Arsenal given what they could offer but Merino for €30m seems like such a bargain in today’s market. Where are you getting a player like that for that price?

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Kimbo said:


I don’t get it. If Bournemouth are paying the loan fee to Liverpool then that makes it no different to any other loan. If they’re paying it to Valencia then they’re paying a loan fee to a club that won’t own him.


Presumably they would like to buy him for £34M then immediately loan him to Bournemouth for a year for £4M. The rules say you can’t do that. So they reckon that by having Bournemouth loan him from Valencia for a year then agreeing to buy him for £30M at that time they “get round” the rules. Plus presumably also distorting PSR by shunting that 30M outlay back a year.

Link to post
Share on other sites

41 minutes ago, leffe186 said:


Presumably they would like to buy him for £34M then immediately loan him to Bournemouth for a year for £4M. The rules say you can’t do that. So they reckon that by having Bournemouth loan him from Valencia for a year then agreeing to buy him for £30M at that time they “get round” the rules. Plus presumably also distorting PSR by shunting that 30M outlay back a year.

Red shirted shithouse cartel cunts.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Liverpool linked with Wharton for £100 million, probably best to start the negotiations now and he might sign before he retires 

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Ben said:

Liverpool linked with Wharton for £100 million, probably best to start the negotiations now and he might sign before he retires 

Be done by tomorrow dinnertime given Parish's fetish for the red clubs 

Link to post
Share on other sites

What a horrendous signing for Leicester.  
 

Skipp is absolute dogmeat, without this move he was destined for a move to Watford when his contract expires.

Link to post
Share on other sites

If it was an obligation to buy if Sheff Utd went down (never ever heard of this before, ever until now), then nothing really wrong with it.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sima said:

What a horrendous signing for Leicester.  
 

Skipp is absolute dogmeat, without this move he was destined for a move to Watford when his contract expires.

He could have been their manager before he was 25

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Ben said:

Liverpool linked with Wharton for £100 million, probably best to start the negotiations now and he might sign before he retires 


You’d have to have some kind of screw loose to spend £100m on Wharton like, as much as I like him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...