Jump to content

Other clubs' transfers


Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

Could certainly see why we bought him last season. He looked very dangerous, but he's not kicked on at all. Still time, but it's running out. 

There's a player there for sure I blame the coaching and that he's under a lot of pressure been your main striker. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 hours ago, Froggy said:

 

Could certainly see why we bought him last season. He looked very dangerous, but he's not kicked on at all. Still time, but it's running out. 


Does sound like you’re giving up on him too early. Tbf a couple of months ago you said he was as good as Isak and worth more because he’s younger. 
Being on a bad run can’t mean he’s suddenly not up to it.

Patience..

Link to post
Share on other sites

Hojlund doesn't have anything to his game to suggest he'll be a top player IMO.

 

Like Delap is overpowered physically. Isak's touch and composure is tops. Jackson and Nunez always seem to find chances.

 

Hojlund? Doesn't have the sniff, average physically, average mentally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The Atalanta manager said that it was the wrong move for him at the time but they couldn’t turn down the money. 
 

I think the pressure at a club like Man U can be crushing. Clubs are so desperate not to miss out players aren’t being allowed their 2-3 years at a Benfica, Atalanta etc before moving to the bigger stage. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, Lotus said:

Does sound like you’re giving up on him too early. Tbf a couple of months ago you said he was as good as Isak and worth more because he’s younger. 
Being on a bad run can’t mean he’s suddenly not up to it.

Patience..

 

That's not even close to what I said. :lol: 

 

I'm not close to giving up on him either, I'm just saying if next season is as bad he's in trouble. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, Froggy said:

 

That's not even close to what I said. :lol: 

 

I'm not close to giving up on him either, I'm just saying if next season is as bad he's in trouble. 

 

It's our job to misinterpret and misrepresent everything you say, Froggy! You know the deal ;D

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, SUPERTOON said:

Arsenal want Rodrygo.

A part of me would like to see it happen. Rodrygo’s good but I’m not sure how good.  Typically he’s amazing for 6-weeks, then will score important goals but otherwise not be a consistent menace. 
 

I actually think he works better with Mbappe at LW than Vini and wouldn’t fetch of the money Vini would if he was sold. But Vini’s proven he can carry a side week in week out. Rodrygo hasn’t. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s the advantage of being an elite club.  Players get those clauses written in their contracts so they can join these clubs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)

Wirtz to City? I hope not! Sounds like Reijnders too probably. Piss off! 

 

 

Edited by Ikon

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, Fak said:

Frimpong to Liverpool for just under £30m.


He’s had a clause in his contract for the last couple of seasons I believe. Baldy going all in on the attacking full backs it would seem.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Frimpong always seemed tailor made for the prem. Never used to bother me the signings Liverpool or City made, but now that we are edging closer to both I am starting to grow frustrated when they do good business. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If City goes through these deals it could mean many of their talented youngsters will be on the table.

 

Since the depth & lack of 2nd team is our main concern, we can poach likes of O'Rilley u know in competitive prices.

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 hours ago, The College Dropout said:

A part of me would like to see it happen. Rodrygo’s good but I’m not sure how good.  Typically he’s amazing for 6-weeks, then will score important goals but otherwise not be a consistent menace. 
 

I actually think he works better with Mbappe at LW than Vini and wouldn’t fetch of the money Vini would if he was sold. But Vini’s proven he can carry a side week in week out. Rodrygo hasn’t. 


Rodrygo is balance with output. Real Madrid selling him is a dumb move, because to get someone that selfishly works hard to offer balance whilst contributing his output will be hard to replace. Side will become unbalanced in attack like we’ve seen PSG over the years.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Posted (edited)
1 hour ago, Menace said:

Froggy was comparing Hojlund to Isak a few months ago. Sad state of affairs.

 

If that's how you took it, then fair enough. I thought I explained it for the layman, but evidently not.

 

Hojlund is 3 years younger than Isak. How many goals did Isak score 3 years ago? 10. How many goals has Hojlund got this season when people believe he's been atrocious? 10.

 

It was simply a discussion on potential, and how Hojlund had time on his side. 

 

 

 

Edited by Froggy

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...