Yorkie Posted 2 hours ago Share Posted 2 hours ago Glad it's finally sunk in! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Just now, Yorkie said: Glad it's finally sunk in! Good morning Yorkie. My old pal. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 2 minutes ago, Froggy said: Cos PSR. Got it. If Howe spunks another £250m in the summer on rubbish, I'll be sure to remember it's PSR's fault. Hmm 1) Chelsea five-year net spend: £-729.62m 26/27: £-54.74m 25/26: £-4.27m (10th) 24/25: £-39.06m (4th) 23/24: £-144.65m (6th) 22/23: £-490.34m (12th) 2) Arsenal five-year net spend: £-576.9m 26/27: £-27.76m 25/26: £-246.26m (Champions) 24/25: £-20.81m (2nd) 23/24: £-144.26m (2nd) 22/23: £-141.39m (2nd) 3) Manchester United five-year net spend: £-543.05m 26/27: £38.17m 25/26: £-154.34m (3rd) 24/25: £-112.89m (15th) 23/24: £-128.48m (8th) 22/23: £-191.94m (3rd) 4) Tottenham five-year net spend: £-528.55m 26/27: – 25/26: £-159.15m (17th) 24/25: £-91.42m (17th) 23/24: £-125.5m (5th) 22/23: £-117m (8th) 5) Liverpool five-year net spend: £-427.27m 26/27: £-55.17m 25/26: £-228.6m (5th) 24/25: £29.14m (Champions) 23/24: £-92.26m (3rd) 22/23: £-53.96m (5th) READ: Liverpool now top 10 biggest transfer window spends ever 6) Manchester City five-year net spend: £-342.17m 26/27: £13m 25/26: £-172.7m (2nd) 24/25: £-87.75m (3rd) 23/24: £-104.64m (Champions) 22/23: £5.94m (Champions) 7) Nottingham Forest five-year net spend: £-323.04m 26/27: – 25/26: £-97.28m (16th) 24/25: £-15.58m (7th) 23/24: £-42.28m (17th) 22/23: £-167.48m (16th) 8) Newcastle United five-year net spend: £-265.21m 26/27: £47.5m 25/26: £-89.94m (12th) 24/25: £-17.73m (5th) 23/24: £-85.79m (7th) 22/23: £-141.69m (4th) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Pathetic you're getting outspent by Forest. Have a word with yourselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Someone absolutely desperate to get their hole here. The tension is palpable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Just now, KennyUtd said: Someone absolutely desperate to get their hole here. The tension is palpable. Is it you Kenny? Because I'm down for anything. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ElectricWizard Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Venkman Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 12 hours ago, The Prophet said: Kin 'ell. That’s fucking stupid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted 1 hour ago Share Posted 1 hour ago 11 hours ago, Turnbull2000 said: Wouldn't think Tonali's wife would be that keen on Manchester? She'll want London or back to Milan, surely. Wouldn't blame Tonali if he demands a City move if a Milan or London club don't come in for him. I think he'll move to any club in England that pays him enough. I'd imagine doubling his wages will soften the blow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 56 minutes ago Share Posted 56 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, TRon said: I think he'll move to any club in England that pays him enough. I'd imagine doubling his wages will soften the blow. He's on a reported £150k a week already. Who's paying him £300k? Based on a very reputable wages website, that would make him the third highest paid player in the league behind Haaland and Van Dijk. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
El Prontonise Posted 51 minutes ago Share Posted 51 minutes ago 5 minutes ago, Froggy said: He's on a reported £150k a week already. Who's paying him £300k? Based on a very reputable wages website, that would make him the third highest paid player in the league behind Haaland and Van Dijk. You forgotten about rashford? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted 50 minutes ago Share Posted 50 minutes ago 1 hour ago, r0cafella said: Hmm 1) Chelsea five-year net spend: £-729.62m 26/27: £-54.74m 25/26: £-4.27m (10th) 24/25: £-39.06m (4th) 23/24: £-144.65m (6th) 22/23: £-490.34m (12th) 2) Arsenal five-year net spend: £-576.9m 26/27: £-27.76m 25/26: £-246.26m (Champions) 24/25: £-20.81m (2nd) 23/24: £-144.26m (2nd) 22/23: £-141.39m (2nd) 3) Manchester United five-year net spend: £-543.05m 26/27: £38.17m 25/26: £-154.34m (3rd) 24/25: £-112.89m (15th) 23/24: £-128.48m (8th) 22/23: £-191.94m (3rd) 4) Tottenham five-year net spend: £-528.55m 26/27: – 25/26: £-159.15m (17th) 24/25: £-91.42m (17th) 23/24: £-125.5m (5th) 22/23: £-117m (8th) 5) Liverpool five-year net spend: £-427.27m 26/27: £-55.17m 25/26: £-228.6m (5th) 24/25: £29.14m (Champions) 23/24: £-92.26m (3rd) 22/23: £-53.96m (5th) READ: Liverpool now top 10 biggest transfer window spends ever 6) Manchester City five-year net spend: £-342.17m 26/27: £13m 25/26: £-172.7m (2nd) 24/25: £-87.75m (3rd) 23/24: £-104.64m (Champions) 22/23: £5.94m (Champions) 7) Nottingham Forest five-year net spend: £-323.04m 26/27: – 25/26: £-97.28m (16th) 24/25: £-15.58m (7th) 23/24: £-42.28m (17th) 22/23: £-167.48m (16th) 8) Newcastle United five-year net spend: £-265.21m 26/27: £47.5m 25/26: £-89.94m (12th) 24/25: £-17.73m (5th) 23/24: £-85.79m (7th) 22/23: £-141.69m (4th) What makes it worse the only player we had with any PSR worth to start the process was ASM and we were even forced to sell him cheap at £20m. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 48 minutes ago Share Posted 48 minutes ago 1 minute ago, El Prontonise said: You forgotten about rashford? Provided he comes back and actually stays, he'd be on £300,000. So Tonali would be joint fourth along with Rashford, Fernandes and Targett. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted 47 minutes ago Share Posted 47 minutes ago 1 hour ago, r0cafella said: Hmm 1) Chelsea five-year net spend: £-729.62m 26/27: £-54.74m 25/26: £-4.27m (10th) 24/25: £-39.06m (4th) 23/24: £-144.65m (6th) 22/23: £-490.34m (12th) 2) Arsenal five-year net spend: £-576.9m 26/27: £-27.76m 25/26: £-246.26m (Champions) 24/25: £-20.81m (2nd) 23/24: £-144.26m (2nd) 22/23: £-141.39m (2nd) 3) Manchester United five-year net spend: £-543.05m 26/27: £38.17m 25/26: £-154.34m (3rd) 24/25: £-112.89m (15th) 23/24: £-128.48m (8th) 22/23: £-191.94m (3rd) 4) Tottenham five-year net spend: £-528.55m 26/27: – 25/26: £-159.15m (17th) 24/25: £-91.42m (17th) 23/24: £-125.5m (5th) 22/23: £-117m (8th) 5) Liverpool five-year net spend: £-427.27m 26/27: £-55.17m 25/26: £-228.6m (5th) 24/25: £29.14m (Champions) 23/24: £-92.26m (3rd) 22/23: £-53.96m (5th) READ: Liverpool now top 10 biggest transfer window spends ever 6) Manchester City five-year net spend: £-342.17m 26/27: £13m 25/26: £-172.7m (2nd) 24/25: £-87.75m (3rd) 23/24: £-104.64m (Champions) 22/23: £5.94m (Champions) 7) Nottingham Forest five-year net spend: £-323.04m 26/27: – 25/26: £-97.28m (16th) 24/25: £-15.58m (7th) 23/24: £-42.28m (17th) 22/23: £-167.48m (16th) 8) Newcastle United five-year net spend: £-265.21m 26/27: £47.5m 25/26: £-89.94m (12th) 24/25: £-17.73m (5th) 23/24: £-85.79m (7th) 22/23: £-141.69m (4th) Far too much effort for an argument that's not worth paying any mind and is 90% just a wind up attempt and 10% extreme unconscious bias. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 47 minutes ago Share Posted 47 minutes ago Just now, Kid Icarus said: Far too much effort for an argument that's not worth paying any mind and is 90% just a wind up attempt and 10% extreme unconscious bias. He's just copied and pasted it. Way more effort went into my post. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted 47 minutes ago Share Posted 47 minutes ago Just now, Kid Icarus said: Far too much effort for an argument that's not worth paying any mind and is 90% just a wind up attempt and 10% extreme unconscious bias. Quick copy and paste job during the afternoon lul at the office Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted 46 minutes ago Share Posted 46 minutes ago See. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted 44 minutes ago Share Posted 44 minutes ago 52 minutes ago, Froggy said: Is it you Kenny? Because I'm down for anything. I wouldn't touch you with @Fak's. No offence like. 😆 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted 38 minutes ago Share Posted 38 minutes ago 1 hour ago, Froggy said: Cos PSR. Got it. If Howe spunks another £250m in the summer on rubbish, I'll be sure to remember it's PSR's fault. You spunk £180m on Sancho & Pogba and it's all good. You can just spunk andther £180m on replacements. If that doesn't work spend another £180m again. Until you finally get it right, which happened this season. We have a shit summer and it's probably set us back years. How's that fair competition? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
cubaricho Posted 32 minutes ago Share Posted 32 minutes ago 2 hours ago, Froggy said: Of course. That was the only transfer that could possibly have been done to satisfy PSR. When Newcastle make a mistake such as selling a player about to go for £120m for £15m, it's cos PSR. I'm silly for continuously forgetting that. Dude I have defended you as a great poster on here that brings a lot to this forum as a fan of a rival but brother. Come onnnnn. This ain’t it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted 29 minutes ago Share Posted 29 minutes ago 12 hours ago, Astroblack said: Is it a crazy take to think Miley is the better player? Higher ceiling, certainly Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted 28 minutes ago Share Posted 28 minutes ago (edited) Last 3 seasons we finished 7th, 4th & 12th. You finished 8th, 16th, 3rd. Since then our net spend is £35m, yours is £260m or so. (Snip doesn't include the Gordon or Jaouen fee). Explain how that can be fair especially when we have the means to not have to do this? It's shit and you know it is. Edited 23 minutes ago by Optimistic Nut Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KingArthur Posted 26 minutes ago Share Posted 26 minutes ago 11 hours ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Enzo was massively overpriced and Caicedo I would consider a failure. Rice of course great, but I thought we'd moved past the era of £100m CMs. I guess it doesn't matter if money is no object, but you don't need to pay that money for a really, really good CM. Caicedo failure? He has been very good. Just that Chelsea is turboshit. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted 22 minutes ago Share Posted 22 minutes ago I've thought as Froggy as some sort of benign cyst over the years. On first noticing the lump you're upset, irritated and determined to remove it. Once you're told it's completely harmless, however, you start to build an affinity with the growth and in some ways can't imagine your cock forum without it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted 22 minutes ago Share Posted 22 minutes ago Wasn't sure where to put this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now