Johnny Posted December 23, 2022 Share Posted December 23, 2022 It's widely reported that Penaldo will join Al Nashr for US$170 Million / year for seven (7) years. 2 years as player and the rest as ambassador for Saudi Arabia World Cup 2030 host bid. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted December 23, 2022 Share Posted December 23, 2022 On 22/12/2022 at 06:58, astraguy said: evey team needs a penalty taker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nemtizz Posted December 23, 2022 Share Posted December 23, 2022 Apparently not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
joeyt Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 think we were linked last Jan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 We were, quite a bit in the early part of the window Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 West Ham also bid for him last summer I think. He's one I'd have loved at NUFC. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 (edited) Ah Chelsea those cheeky chappies at Stamford Bridge. Backed by JP Morgan and the Bank of America, splashing over a quarter of a billion on first team players and hoovering up every youth prospect going. They're good lads though, they didn't ruin football like the Saudis. Edited December 24, 2022 by The Prophet Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 2 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Ah Chelsea those cheeky chappies at Stamford Bridge. Backed by JP and the Bank of America, splashing over a quarter of a billion on first team players and hoovering up every youth prospect going. They're good lads though, they didn't ruin football like the Saudis. What's the craic with them and FFP? Has Abramovichs historic spend all be written off or what? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 7 minutes ago, Minhosa said: What's the craic with them and FFP? Has Abramovichs historic spend all be written off or what? Football finance expert Dr Rob Wilson of Sheffield Hallam University said: ‘In layman’s terms, the £4.25billion sale price of Chelsea could have wiped out the debt and losses that had been accumulated at the club over the last 20-odd years so essentially, Chelsea then start at zero base under the terms of FFP. Whereas a club like Arsenal, for example, who are consistently owned, cannot write off that debt repayment and those losses in the same way so it frees up cash.’ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Minhosa Posted December 24, 2022 Share Posted December 24, 2022 10 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Football finance expert Dr Rob Wilson of Sheffield Hallam University said: ‘In layman’s terms, the £4.25billion sale price of Chelsea could have wiped out the debt and losses that had been accumulated at the club over the last 20-odd years so essentially, Chelsea then start at zero base under the terms of FFP. Whereas a club like Arsenal, for example, who are consistently owned, cannot write off that debt repayment and those losses in the same way so it frees up cash.’ How can that be fair FFS? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 He's shite? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
teohgk Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 18 hours ago, Minhosa said: How can that be fair FFS? Financial Fair Play not meant to be fair anyway Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gbandit Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 Can’t wait for Chelsea to collapse like, a couple seasons outside the top 4, a few more managers only in for a year and some flops. Fuck off down the league, Chelsea, ya filthy animals Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Cronky Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 19 hours ago, The Prophet said: Football finance expert Dr Rob Wilson of Sheffield Hallam University said: ‘In layman’s terms, the £4.25billion sale price of Chelsea could have wiped out the debt and losses that had been accumulated at the club over the last 20-odd years so essentially, Chelsea then start at zero base under the terms of FFP. Whereas a club like Arsenal, for example, who are consistently owned, cannot write off that debt repayment and those losses in the same way so it frees up cash.’ Yeah, but the money from the sale goes to Abramovich and not the club, so how can it be counted as the club's income? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 3 minutes ago, Cronky said: Yeah, but the money from the sale goes to Abramovich and not the club, so how can it be counted as the club's income? The money doesn’t go to Abramovich though, does it? Plus the sale price included a set amount for redeveloping the ground (£1.5bn or something similar?), so I’d presume that just gets ploughed into the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kimbo Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 If there’s no super league Chelsea will end up looking like the worst investment ever. Boehly will look a right mug. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 21 hours ago, joeyt said: think we were linked last Jan I have this unfounded and untested idea that we would sign him and replace Dan Burn with him. Imagine pairing him with Schar, Botman and Trips. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kanj Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 20 hours ago, Minhosa said: How can that be fair FFS? the explanation you quoted makes about as negative sense as you can imagine. How does an acquisition wipe out ffp issues? Is it entity based? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 3 hours ago, The Butcher said: He's shite? Hope he plays tomorrow. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 21 hours ago, The Prophet said: Football finance expert Dr Rob Wilson of Sheffield Hallam University said: ‘In layman’s terms, the £4.25billion sale price of Chelsea could have wiped out the debt and losses that had been accumulated at the club over the last 20-odd years so essentially, Chelsea then start at zero base under the terms of FFP. Whereas a club like Arsenal, for example, who are consistently owned, cannot write off that debt repayment and those losses in the same way so it frees up cash.’ I don't think that's correct, debt is not relevant to EPL FFP other than cost of interest, if any. Anyway, Chelsea have taken on £850m of debt since they were taken over. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Manxst Posted December 25, 2022 Share Posted December 25, 2022 (edited) 18 minutes ago, Jackie Broon said: Anyway, Chelsea have taken on £850m of debt since they were taken over. What’s this debt? Edit- nevermind, found it: “Chelsea’s new owners are raising roughly UK£800 million (US$957 million) of debt as they bid to reshape the running of the English soccer giants, according to the Financial Times (FT). The consortium led by US billionaire Todd Boehly completed its UK£4.25 billion (US$5.08 billion) takeover of the Premier League club at the end of May. The group is now looking to implement a financial plan to boost the Blues’ operations and update the Stamford Bridge stadium. Bank of America and JPMorgan are among the banks said to be involved with the financing. The financing arrangements consist of a roughly UK£300 million (US$359 million) revolving credit facility and a UK£500 million (US$598 million) term loan. This would eclipse the reported US$650 million raised by City Football Group (CFG), the owner of English soccer champions Manchester City, back in July 2021 to invest in its network of clubs. As part of the consortium’s UK£4.25 billion Chelsea takeover, UK£1.75 billion (US$2.09 billion) was allocated to invest in the club, including players, talent academies and the stadium. The new loan would reportedly form part of the commitment, while the revolving credit facility is for working capital purposes. The investment pledge was critical to meeting the terms set by Chelsea’s previous owner Roman Abramovich, who put the West London club up for sale after Russia invaded Ukraine. The UK government sanctioned Abramovich in March, accusing him of close links to Vladimir Putin. The terms of the sale also included restrictions on debt levels to protect the club. According to the FT, Chelsea will not bear any of the interest expense associated with the debt because of the structure of the financing and all proceeds will go into the business.” Edited December 25, 2022 by Manxst Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Butcher Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted December 26, 2022 Share Posted December 26, 2022 Liverpool are brilliant at getting deals done. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now