Jump to content

Miguel Almirón (now playing for Atlanta United)


Recommended Posts

Wouldn't be too surprised if he leaves in the summer. Been a bit of a disappointment overall during his time here, imo. Hope he can turn it around and become the player we all want him to be, but I must admit I have my doubts.

 

Was okay today, mind.

 

 

Edited by The Butcher

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's always like this, runs around a lot but with little to no impact, its been said above but that run he made for his chance was a collectors items, for a fast player he hardly ever makes a run that's threatening, and at certain points in the game he looked like a kid playing with adults, towards the end he got better and helped Manquillo out a few times but i'm still really not convinced with him as a player/

Link to post
Share on other sites

A 'kid playing with adults' is a pretty bizarre overstatement in the context of that game.

 

He was fine. He made tackles, kept the ball moving, made a couple of good runs, forced a decent save and was a block away from maybe sneaking in a goal. Also made some poor decisions in good positions.

 

My main criticism of him over the last 2 years is that he's become too passive. He too often takes a safe route which is a routine he needs to get out of.

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Beth said:

You can argue he's been "Bruced" to a degree but I've never been a fan of him and never will be. Theres a lot more to being a footballer than the ability to run around alot.

Yeah but you don't like anything though tbf. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

In most games I watch and go to I pick out a player and watch him , today Miggy caught my attention , in a bad way .

 

He came across as a nothing player who ran around actually not touching the ball and offering very little.

 

He had a better second half but his play in general was way below the standard we need , he will struggle to keep his place going forward if this is how he performs.After all though I always feel better if he’s in the team , no idea why , sorry :dontknow:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Disagree.. He showed more attacking intent over that 90 minutes than Fraser or Murphy have.  Watched this on a dodgy stream, but the game highlight reel is all Miggy inthe second half. So, yeah, if we're bringing Dembele or some such, he's way below the standard. But in that position, choosing between  Miggy, Fraser, or Murphy, I'll pick him every time. It's his first start for Howe. Let's see how things look when he's been de-Bruced.

 

 

Edited by gazza ladra
Changed strongly disagree to plain disagree

Link to post
Share on other sites

28 minutes ago, gazza ladra said:

Disagree.. He showed more attacking intent over that 90 minutes than Fraser or Murphy have.  Watched this on a dodgy stream, but the game highlight reel is all Miggy inthe second half. So, yeah, if we're bringing Dembele or some such, he's way below the standard. But in that position, choosing between  Miggy, Fraser, or Murphy, I'll pick him every time. It's his first start for Howe. Let's see how things look when he's been de-Bruced.

 

 

 


 

Think my finding were based mainly on the first half , as I stated he improved in the second and I have pointed out he was better second half .

 

To me though overall he’s a disappointing player , when he first came he was a breathe of fresh air , now I’m not sure what he brings ? Just my opinion mate , I’m usually wrong :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

It's a strange situation because he can be extremely frustrating to watch and often seems to shoot when he should pass and pass when he should shoot - but - he stretches play and presses incredibly well and the team seems to work better with him in it

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think his position in yesterday’s system would be that kind of half space left of midfield slot that Willock was playing in, where he would be doing the bulk of ASM’s defensive work but would also be able to link up with him on the counter and provide overlaps.

 

No point in playing him on the right imo. He has no right foot and he’s not a good enough dribbler make up for it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 hours ago, gazza ladra said:

Disagree.. He showed more attacking intent over that 90 minutes than Fraser or Murphy have.  Watched this on a dodgy stream, but the game highlight reel is all Miggy inthe second half. So, yeah, if we're bringing Dembele or some such, he's way below the standard. But in that position, choosing between  Miggy, Fraser, or Murphy, I'll pick him every time. It's his first start for Howe. Let's see how things look when he's been de-Bruced.

 

 

 

I'd play Murphy ahead of Almiron on the wing every time, at least he can beat a man and put the odd decent cross in, Almiron can't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Beth said:

I'd play Murphy ahead of Almiron on the wing every time, at least he can beat a man and put the odd decent cross in, Almiron can't.

There is an argument for both, what Almiron does is press, has a high level of energy, can carry the ball and cut across the pitch from the right side which allows overlaps and switches our play. Or he can play left like a winger. I’d start him if fit every game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, George Bailey said:

He is comfortably one of better players. Possibly says more about the squad than him, but the lad starts for me when fit.

Murphy ahead of him is sheer lunacy.

He's not a winger though. If you're going to play him it has to be in the No 10 role or not at all imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I thought he was pretty poor on Saturday and often is when playing wide.  I think he has to play behind the striker or not at all, from the start.  I'm not really a fan of him always wanting to cut back and slow the play down.  Rarely takes his man on these days, either.  I think if he is going to play right wing, then I would genuinely prefer Fraser or perhaps Murphy.  Although I think there is an argument on those two being better as impact players off the bench for us, at present. 

 

His work rate and pressing is pretty impressive, mind and he was probably our top performer for a good while, despite being played in numerous positions under Brewcie.  So I think he deserves a bit of leeway and I might be being a bit harsh.

Link to post
Share on other sites

He's never been more than average on the right, it's just not his position. His only hope of being really effective is some shuffling of ASM and Joelinton, and then the question becomes "Is what Almiron brings more important than moving either/both of those two to accommodate it?"

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Raconteur said:

He's never been more than average on the right, it's just not his position. His only hope of being really effective is some shuffling of ASM and Joelinton, and then the question becomes "Is what Almiron brings more important than moving either/both of those two to accommodate it?"

If we had a stronger middle we could let Joe do his thing on the right hand side and leave Almiron free in the middle, with a little bit of responsibility in backing up ASM.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Even though he played on the right, it’s not as if he was glued to the touch line.

 

His three chances in the game all came

from him drifting infield and adding an extra body centrally. This also drags the left back infield, creating space for whoever is at RB to overlap.

 

I think it’s worth persevering with for a few games to see how it develops.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...