TRon Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 No manager worth their salt would allow themselves to have people like Charnley and Ashley pick and buy players for them, under these restrictions you could never actually build a team. No manager wants or is happy to stand still season after season. Bruce isn't worth his salt. He's been a proven failure in the Premier, and is currently managing a side in the championship. When is he likely to get the chance to manage at this level again? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. I think you and a few other people are in for a rude awakening when you find out there is enough people who actually attend games who will be happy to give local Bruce a fair chance. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Anderson Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Probably time to do away with the '?' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest Yerdas El Savon Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Bruce?? bye Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 me and mates just discussing who the worst possible choice could be (or best depending on your perspective), first lad: Dennis Wise game over Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
manorpark Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. I think you and a few other people are in for a rude awakening when you find out there is enough people who actually attend games who will be happy to give local Bruce a fair chance. Not a 'rude awakening' at all, we all know that there are many people who do not really care about the club and its future at all. They will all be there "cheering good old Brucie and Ashley along" at the tops of their voices. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 me and mates just discussing who the worst possible choice could be (or best depending on your perspective), first lad: Dennis Wise game over Dennis Wise would be ideal if you were looking for an angry response from the fans. That is where Ashley has been crafty in going for a man with Newcastle roots to try and get the dimwit fan section onside. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Really struggling to see any logic to any of this. It seems more vindictive than logical. They’ve panicked. Allardyce was clearly 1st choice. No one else wants it. This is a guy that appointed Kinnear Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 On a serious note, could it be possible that Bruce mistook patsy for pasty, and got excited? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheGuv Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 As if we ever thought that smiley would be required again... Only this time we'll be using it against ourselves. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Given he’s a Newcastle fan apparently, I wonder whether he thinks Ashley is the right man to own us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Munkey Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 after he's appointed just think of the Ashley love-in on SkySports and TalkSport. Wise, Nolan, Ferdinand etc all trotted out to say how great Mike is in appointing a propa geordie Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest chopey Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 As its been said on here a thousand times anyone that is prepared to accept the job under Ashley's conditions with Charnley as your boss is automatically the wrong person for the job. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because he'd never come back as he's dealt with these charlatans before, and was totally disrespected. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Question asked a few hours ago is all, caused the same uproar https://www.newcastle-online.org/forum/index.php?topic=103091.msg7033049#msg7033049 Unless you've secretly been Gallowgate End all along?!?! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because there is zero chance of him saying yes after Ashley shat on him, don't you remember? Howay man Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. I think you and a few other people are in for a rude awakening when you find out there is enough people who actually attend games who will be happy to give local Bruce a fair chance. I'm under no illusions what some of our fans are like, thanks very much. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Thomson Mouse Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because he’d robably tell them to fuck off Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LFEE Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because they know Hughton wouldn’t come within a million miles of their regime. Your mind gone blank? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because there is zero chance of him saying yes after Ashley shat on him, don't you remember? Howay man They approached Fat Sam who was also sacked. What's the difference? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
UncleBingo Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because he’d robably tell them to f*** off It didn't stop them with Allardyce. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gallowgate End Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Question asked a few hours ago is all, caused the same uproar https://www.newcastle-online.org/forum/index.php?topic=103091.msg7033049#msg7033049 Unless you've secretly been Gallowgate End all along?!?! “Same uproar” not sure he’s getting the abuse I did UncleBingo just make sure you have the same opinion as everyone else only way you won’t get abused on here ha. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ToonArmy1892 Posted July 11, 2019 Share Posted July 11, 2019 Not that it make much difference in the grand scheme of things, but surely Hughton would have been the better option? Well liked here and available for nowt, would have made much more sense. Is this a wind up? In what way? I'm just questioning why they didn't go for Hughton given that he was available for nowt? Because there is zero chance of him saying yes after Ashley shat on him, don't you remember? Howay man They approached Fat Sam who was also sacked. What's the difference? Already been explained, one has decency and self respect, the other doesn't Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts