RS Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest piss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. According to our government spin, but who is telling the truth?. MegalolZ Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hhtoon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Bet Ashley has killed dozens with his own bare hands but is just better at hiding the evidence. I dread to think of the number of people entering sports direct warehouses never to come out. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Like talking to a brick wall Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 So the takeover has peaked, URI Gellar getting involved. I really wish I could bail out, it’s all too much now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
wormy Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 This thread is definitely reaching 1000 pages without this sorry mess concluding either way. In that time my money's on 7 6 more morality arguments, 5 more bowel movement support groups, 3 more clique flounces and 1 more nonce outing. One down. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? All that has been answered in the post you replied to. The only new point you brought up was Hitler, and the decision was taken at govt level that he was a murderer and that is why all sporting relations were stopped with Germany. If you want to draw a comparison, we've just had a govt directive which appears to support the investment from the Saudis in NUFC. Does that mean we are aiding and abetting a murderous regime right at the very top level? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? All that has been answered in the post you replied to. The only new point you brought up was Hitler, and the decision was taken at govt level that he was a murderer and that is why all sporting relations were stopped with Germany. If you want to draw a comparison, we've just had a govt directive which appears to support the investment from the Saudis in NUFC. Does that mean we are aiding and abetting a murderous regime right at the very top level? Yes it does Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Little Waster Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Whatever we dislike about the Saudi regime the reality is their £££ is clean - it comes from selling oil . It is our right and in present 20% GDP drop circumstances our duty to take their £££ off them and put it to good use . Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people So have our government. Willfully, in just the last 4 months. Difference is, our government have killed tens of thousands of completely innocent people just to save their mates in the city done money. The Saudis probably didn't deserve to die, but unlike those killed by Boris, at least the people killed in Saudi had probably done something they shouldn't have done. And there were way fewer of them over a much longer period. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
t00nraider Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 The money might be clean but that is not the only requirement for the PL to approve the takeover. The rate of the country's GDP is not a factor as far as I am aware. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest The Little Waster Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 The money might be clean but that is not the only requirement for the PL to approve the takeover. The rate of the country's GDP is not a factor as far as I am aware. Im not talking about the PL o&d test Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people So have our government. Willfully, in just the last 4 months. Difference is, our government have killed tens of thousands of completely innocent people just to save their mates in the city done money. The Saudis probably didn't deserve to die, but unlike those killed by Boris, at least the people killed in Saudi had probably done something they shouldn't have done. And there were way fewer of them over a much longer period. Err nah, the Saudis have also bombed thousands of innocent people in Yemen. What a weird justification as well for those executed by the Saudis saying that they probably done something they shouldn't have done. Also as has been stated roughly 20,000 times since this thread started the British government aren't buying a football club Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
nufcjb Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 I swear this thread goes on auto loop every Thursday-Sunday. The main issue discussed are the same every week on those days. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? All that has been answered in the post you replied to. The only new point you brought up was Hitler, and the decision was taken at govt level that he was a murderer and that is why all sporting relations were stopped with Germany. If you want to draw a comparison, we've just had a govt directive which appears to support the investment from the Saudis in NUFC. Does that mean we are aiding and abetting a murderous regime right at the very top level? Yes it does Then it must be ok. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Skeletor Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 This is a bit of a joke at this stage. Literally hasn't moved an inch in about 2 months. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr.Spaceman Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 This is a bit of a joke at this stage. Literally hasn't moved an inch in about 2 months. How do you know that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? All that has been answered in the post you replied to. The only new point you brought up was Hitler, and the decision was taken at govt level that he was a murderer and that is why all sporting relations were stopped with Germany. If you want to draw a comparison, we've just had a govt directive which appears to support the investment from the Saudis in NUFC. Does that mean we are aiding and abetting a murderous regime right at the very top level? Yes it does Then it must be ok. Do you agree with everything the British government do? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Officially the biggest p*ss-take in the history of football buyouts. Ashley (the slave labour, zero hour specialist) Just walked in, weighed over and took the reins hadn't realised Ashley had killed a man or ran an illegal streaming service. Neither have the PIF directors, the Reubens, or Staveley. Although Amanada is up in court so count vouch 100% for her, but I don't think she has. PIF directors have absolutely killed thousands of people If that's the case, then surely the PL officials would have ruled them unsuitable owners and directors straight off the bat. Well it is the case, but the PL probably don't really care about that, they clearly do care that Saudi Arabia has been stealing their product from them. They have their priorities right then. Their remit is to run the football league, not override our govt and decide who is and isn't personally responsible for deaths of thousands. Trump and Boris to this day haven't fingered MBS personally, far as I know he blew it off with some bull about bodyguards acting without his permission and Trump and Boris lapped it up readily. In fact wouldn't surprise me if they didn't suggest it in a memo. Ok so let's just go through what you've said here: 1. PIF directors haven't killed anyone 2. Well if they had killed anyone then the PL would have dismissed their case straight away. 3. The PL don't care about them killing people, they have their priorities right All of them are right actually. Because if MBS is the name you are going to put to it, he hasn't actually killed anyone. Someone else might have done it on his behest, but that's not for the PL to decide, so they have got their priorities right. How are they right? Number 2 and 3 contradict each other Did Hitler not kill anyone either then? All that has been answered in the post you replied to. The only new point you brought up was Hitler, and the decision was taken at govt level that he was a murderer and that is why all sporting relations were stopped with Germany. If you want to draw a comparison, we've just had a govt directive which appears to support the investment from the Saudis in NUFC. Does that mean we are aiding and abetting a murderous regime right at the very top level? Yes it does Then it must be ok. Do you agree with everything the British government do? Not at all...just the stuff which gets us rid of a cunt of an owner and gets us new ones who will want to compete for honours. A shockingly biased Newcastle viewpoint I admit, but there it is. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
xLiaaamx Posted June 13, 2020 Share Posted June 13, 2020 Expecting some Qatari leakage of the report details in the Sundays tonight with the release being this week. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts