Guest godzilla Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Just read that Martin Samuel article. To me it stinks of someone who just wants to cast a shadow of doubt in Newcadtle fans' heads as they're starting to get excited and he doesn't like it. It's basically just his opinion. If that is the case, then it has worked with me. The fat f***ing prick. Can't just let us enjoy it. The documents strongly indicate a deal has been agreed for a start. Mind it's a bullet point at the top and he doesn't mention it at all in his actual article. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ryan Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Just read that Martin Samuel article. To me it stinks of someone who just wants to cast a shadow of doubt in Newcadtle fans' heads as they're starting to get excited and he doesn't like it. It's basically just his opinion. If that is the case, then it has worked with me. The fat fucking prick. Can't just let us enjoy it. He really is pathetic. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Just read that Martin Samuel article. To me it stinks of someone who just wants to cast a shadow of doubt in Newcadtle fans' heads as they're starting to get excited and he doesn't like it. It's basically just his opinion. If that is the case, then it has worked with me. The fat fucking prick. Can't just let us enjoy it. Pretty sure all reports suggest it wouldn’t have gotten to the stage of the premier league checks without a price being agreed. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MW Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Is there a summary somewhere of the new potential ownership structure? Why is Ashley needing to lend them £150m (or whatever the number is) for a 5 year period? Is that for the non Saudi portion? That's a drop in the ocean for the wealth we are talking, makes you also wonder what kind of conditions Ashley will be attaching to that. I'll take anything now above Ashley to roll the dice, but it's a bit fishy that we can't pay it up front given the amount of money supposedly being thrown around. Ashley is not lending them £150m for 5 years. Can you clarify for me the instalments part or whatever? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
sleazy Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 is that not just the transfer of the clubs debt to ashley? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 I understand all other reports and documents lodged at companies house strongly suggest the complete opposite to what fat samuel is saying, but what he's said has put that horrible feeling back in my gut this morning because its Mike Ashley this involves. I really really cant stand people who like to stop peoples enjoyment just to be fucking cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Facundo Ferreyra Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 I'm also in the "Martin Samuel is a fucking buzzkill cunt who has put doubt in my mind" camp. Prick. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Is there a summary somewhere of the new potential ownership structure? Why is Ashley needing to lend them £150m (or whatever the number is) for a 5 year period? Is that for the non Saudi portion? That's a drop in the ocean for the wealth we are talking, makes you also wonder what kind of conditions Ashley will be attaching to that. I'll take anything now above Ashley to roll the dice, but it's a bit fishy that we can't pay it up front given the amount of money supposedly being thrown around. Ashley is not lending them £150m for 5 years. Can you clarify for me the instalments part or whatever? There won't be any instalments. What needs clarifying about that? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MW Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Is there a summary somewhere of the new potential ownership structure? Why is Ashley needing to lend them £150m (or whatever the number is) for a 5 year period? Is that for the non Saudi portion? That's a drop in the ocean for the wealth we are talking, makes you also wonder what kind of conditions Ashley will be attaching to that. I'll take anything now above Ashley to roll the dice, but it's a bit fishy that we can't pay it up front given the amount of money supposedly being thrown around. Think you need to read the summary from that lass lawyer who explains her interpretation (and seems most likely) as to what the documentation at Companies House represents. Cheers will take a look. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RS Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Nobody knows where it’s at apart from where the published paperwork is. Samuels might creep around Ashley but he’s not going to be in the loop of a £300m deal. He sells papers and internet clicks. Mackems will be wanking like fuk over it though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Andy84 Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jdckelly Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 just a reminder to people, theres still the possibility ashley turns around and says nah changed my mind £100m more please Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter Here we go again it seems Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Everybody be cool! Stay positive. It’s just Martin Samuel being Martin Samuel. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shearergol Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 just a reminder to people, theres still the possibility ashley turns around and says nah changed my mind £100m more please We all know that man. Let people actually have some hope though yeah? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter Here we go again it seems All he is doing is spouting what Samuel has put. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Samuel probably gets paid per click on his articles on the DM website. What better way to guarantee clicks than to post an article throwing doubt on the sale of the club when fans are desperate for news. Horrible man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
SUPERTOON Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter Here we go again it seems All he is doing is spouting what Samuel has put. Yeah but he says that Samuel has spoken to Ashley recently so it’s coming from Ashley Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter Here we go again it seems All he is doing is spouting what Samuel has put. Yeah but he says that Samuel has spoken to Ashley recently so it’s coming from Ashley I think he meant in that interview he did with Ashley last time that fakeover went tits up. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter Here we go again it seems All he is doing is spouting what Samuel has put. Yeah but he says that Samuel has spoken to Ashley recently so it’s coming from Ashley It's not man read his article he said he hasn't spoken to him (I quote "The seller has said nothing"). Look at the documentation that has been submitted and read @RedRoseMichelle tweet about what it all means. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Mark Douglas is trotting out the “Ashley’s side are sceptical” line on Twitter For some reason he's blocked me Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Wilson Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Whether you trust Samuel, Douglas or whoever... Deep down we probably all know which story will turn out to be true Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest godzilla Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Whether you trust Samuel, Douglas or whoever... Deep down we probably all know which story will turn out to be true Got nothing to do with trust just look at the documentation submitted and signed by both parties. Never got anywhere near this stage and again read the tweet from @RedRoseMichelle as it sums it up pretty well what is actually happening. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shays Given Tim Flowers Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 It happen. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted April 17, 2020 Share Posted April 17, 2020 Well at least I'll save money on not having to buy a season ticket now. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts