Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Yeah, but only because the broken structure of football means it’s the only way to compete. 

Imagine a PL in which the greedy 6 have left and we're bankrolled into becoming as strong as the teams in the mega league. We'd walk it every year and it would fucking stink.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The thing that annoys me most and should annoy all other football fans the most imo is the intent behind this when you look at the structure and the numbers. It's essentially just content creation. With the lack of competition for entry and the structure of the rounds and the prize money there is really 0 competitive incentive. It's just there to be there. And to drive ad revenue by its existence and it's starting with what it see's as the most "attractive brands" to ensure the highest audience figures possible. More than anything it just all sounds so fucking boring and unspectacular. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdckelly said:

honestly I'd think they'd like that, why risk their assets playing for somebody who's not them 

 

Exactly what was said on Sky when they were quoting a board member of one of the big six, said they'd love that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, jdckelly said:

honestly I'd think they'd like that, why risk their assets playing for somebody who's not them 

Players do like playing for their countries though. It would make them think twice about who to sign for and could go a long way in undermining the ESL.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Candi_Hills said:

Players do like playing for their countries though. It would make them think twice about who to sign for and could go a long way in undermining the ESL.

thing is its funny what a big wad of cash can do to someones opinion 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

Imagine a PL in which the greedy 6 have left and we're bankrolled into becoming as strong as the teams in the mega league. We'd walk it every year and it would fucking stink.

Yep. Football is fucked now it’s too far gone. There should have been salary and spending caps as well as a certain amount of your squad having to be homegrown/ from your academy from just after the PL started, or certainly before the 100k plus a week contracts became the norm. Should have been a limit of £25 a ticket and standing sections too. It’s too far gone and this implosion has been coming for a a while. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Shays Given Tim Flowers said:

And whilst you perhaps couldn't exile the clubs from the competition I would wager you'll be able to stop players playing in domestic leagues and cups if they are playing in the Super League. Certainly they could be barred from International selection, looking at Rugby Union as an example. 

That's a really good point. Someone like Jonny Wilkinson only moved to Toulon after his England career was over. I half remember Toby Flood moving to France when he was earlier in his career and could have perhaps played for England a few more times instead. All the money was in the French league then, perhaps still is judging by what Saracens did or tried to do. 

I do think it's easier (but still very worthwhile) for rugby to adopt a take the money or play for national team stance because money is relatively new to the sport having only been officially professional since the mid 90s whereas football has had a headstart on greed. 

To mix yet more further sporting similarities, this whole thing goes away if the football authorities fully ostracise the rebels like in the World Series Cricket days (but perhaps with more long term success). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Apparently the government are considering options such as making the ESL a national interest, so the games legally have to be broadcast on free to air TV, which would massively devalue the broadcasting rights.

Not giving them work permits when required.

Not giving them policing permits, so games can not be policed and therefore can not go ahead.

Taxing them, and heavily.

 

 

Edited by Stifler

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, jdckelly said:

thing is its funny what a big wad of cash can do to someones opinion 

True, but they do still like their world cups. I couldn't see someone with Ronaldo or Haaland's drive sacking off their country. You'd have to think the likes of Bayern, Dortmund, PSG (for now), oil-rich Newcastle and a few other good sides would become pretty attractive places to play. The super league wouldn't have it all their way, I don't think.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, geordie_b said:

Theres nothing stopping each countries FAs from banning players from their national team is there?

You don’t have a right to be picked for the international team so I can’t see a legal comeback. It would be like when the England Rugby team would only select domestic players (don’t know if that’s still a thing)

I think the issue would initially be that they are contracted to those clubs now so seems unfair to ban them mid-contract. Hopefully new signings would be fair game if they want to take that route... would certainly highlight player priorities

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, ED209 said:


 

do we all not want Newcastle to get taken over with and start buying things with erm oil money?

No, I want them to be taken over by someone with the clubs best interests at heart.  Someone who will run the club with ambition as a sporting institution not a as company.  That's is, I don't care if they spend hundreds or millions extra.  As long as they use all of the clubs money, try to grow revenue and speculate a little to try to build the club.  That doesn't require oil money, in fact in all honestly I'd rather that then doing a Man City.  Because I just think that without the possibility of risk and failure, true competition, then success will feel a bit shite.  Of course if given a choice between Ashley's utter death of the club vs the Man City approach I'd choose the later. But my preferred option is honest competition and ambition. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, BlueStar said:

Danish Uefa guy says he expects Chelsea, Man City and Real Madrid to be kicked out the Champions League this week 

Surely that would also mean Arsenal and Man Utd get kicked out of the Europa League as well?

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, nufcjb said:

Was reading the yellow banner on SSN about the Premier League meeting tomorrow that they would be discussing proposals. Would love to know what they are.

How to bend over without looking like we're being bent over.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Candi_Hills said:

True, but they do still like their world cups. I couldn't see someone with Ronaldo or Haaland's drive sacking off their country. You'd have to think the likes of Bayern, Dortmund, PSG (for now), oil-rich Newcastle and a few other good sides would become pretty attractive places to play. The super league wouldn't have it all their way, I don't think.

depends on the player, theres no way I can see Ronaldo or Messi giving up international football for this shit 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Stifler said:

Surely that would also mean Arsenal and Man Utd get kicked out of the Europa League as well?

easier to sort out than the champions league atm since it would mean psg winning by default and they're likely to fuck off to the ESL at the first opportune moment post world cup 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...