Jump to content

Takeover Thread - July 1st statement, Staveley letter to Tracey Crouch (and response) in OP


Recommended Posts

Rather telling that he hasn’t retweeted his colleague Jason Burt’s article, but was quick to retweet previous ones when it had stalled.

 

Funny that.

 

Funniest part of this entire saga was right at the very start, during the morning of the Companies House changes, when Edwards steamed in to shit on it and had to delete his tweet after 10 mins because someone at the Telegraph clearly had a word to say Burt had the exclusive.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah I’m going to have to keep shtum on this one.

 

It’s not completed though before you all ask.

In the face of what is going to become a public legal battle the Premier League have backed down on their stance which means no legal action is needed for now and the club are free reapply for the owners and directors test which they are presumably going to pass as the Premier League have in practice admitted they were about rejecting them?

Is this just a guess by the way?

Just reading between the lines.
Link to post
Share on other sites

Rather telling that he hasn’t retweeted his colleague Jason Burt’s article, but was quick to retweet previous ones when it had stalled.

 

Funny that.

 

Funniest part of this entire saga was right at the very start, during the morning of the Companies House changes, when Edwards steamed in to s*** on it and had to delete his tweet after 10 mins because someone at the Telegraph clearly had a word to say Burt had the exclusive.

 

He’s been on the back foot since this whole story broke, he clearly has no relevant sources, tries to belittle other journalists and just displays a complete lack of knowledge around the whole proceess.

 

And to top it all off he comes across as a completely unlikeable cunt.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Isn't he just repeating what that Ben Jacobs (someone who does have an actual source) said.

He's the Telegraph's version of NUFC360

 

Of course he is, and like always, he's left it 24 hours before giving his "take" on it so he can get the attention from it.

 

 

 

Good old Luke, 24 hour hours late to the party again.  As I said the other day, almost as if it's for attention.

Couldn’t resist another dig at Caulkin there.
Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

I don't care who would be in it, a small minority of clubs shouldn't have control over the majority.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

 

 

You can be a very 'top' club in the Premier league, without being part of the "Sky-invented 'Big' 6 or 'Big' 7. You can win the Premier League and still not sign up to join the Sleazy Six.

 

The whole Big Picture corruption STAINS the sport we have all loved.

 

Sadly "loved" (in the past) is the appropriate word for many of us now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

 

Everyone is saying no to it, but the Saudi takeover shows most will ignore their moral conscience when it suits.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

 

Everyone is saying no to it, but the Saudi takeover shows most will ignore their moral conscience when it suits.

 

No they aren't.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

 

Everyone is saying no to it, but the Saudi takeover shows most will ignore their moral conscience when it suits.

 

Yeah. We're not complaining about the set-up we're complaining that we're not part of it. This is the way of the world these days.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

 

Everyone is saying no to it, but the Saudi takeover shows most will ignore their moral conscience when it suits.

 

What rubbish, complete rubbish.

 

You can be a very 'top' club in the Premier league, without being part of the "Sky-invented 'Big' 6 or 'Big' 7. You can win the Premier League and still not sign up to join the Sleazy Six.

 

The whole Big Picture corruption STAINS the sport we have all loved.

 

Sadly "loved" (in the past) is the appropriate word for many of us now.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Why does Luke Edwards need a coping mechanism? He's a Leyton Orient fan. This take over affects him not one jot emotionally.

 

Because the whole thing needs to be about him.  The constant 24 hour delay before he posts his contrary opinion each time there's something newsworthy is evidence of that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

What would everybody think of Big Picture if it was the top 7 clubs with Newcastle included?

 

Everyone is saying no to it, but the Saudi takeover shows most will ignore their moral conscience when it suits.

 

Two completely different situations

 

Saudi takeover will improve Newcastle immeasurably

 

The big picture power grab will destroy the English game

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...