LiquidAK Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Would they have even posted in the first place if there was no case? Seems like you'd wait til the first meeting before announcing it to the world Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Wraith warning - Kate Stewart's come back, considering legal action allegedly. Hahaha, I was lulled a little early on but now it's comical seeing him defend that account. "She's" his "good friend" he defended a while back Urghh man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Ddos attack by Qatar. Chill. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
mrmojorisin75 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Wraith warning - Kate Stewart's come back, considering legal action allegedly. Hahaha, I was lulled a little early on but now it's comical seeing him defend that account. "She's" his "good friend" he defended a while back Urghh man. What's this bollocks, who's she? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Only reason it would be deleted is its ended already negatively. You aren't going to delete something that's ended in a win. The PL probably have some fine print somewhere saying they can ignore every single one of the rules if it benefits them. Jesus, where do I buy my ticket to jump from the tyne The lockdown won't allow you might draw a crowd Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Only reason it would be deleted is its ended already negatively. You aren't going to delete something that's ended in a win. The PL probably have some fine print somewhere saying they can ignore every single one of the rules if it benefits them. Surely they'd have read all that small print BEFORE taking the case on and publicly saying they are taking the case on? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 How the hell do you go from an article being taken down to ‘woe is me, it’s all over’ in the space of a few seconds?? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pixelphish Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 How the hell do you go from an article being taken down to ‘woe is me, it’s all over’ in the space of a few seconds?? Its the N-O special. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 The rules of the internet famously state that page deletion is reserved for severing business ties. It would be foolish to assume anything else. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LiquidAK Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Only reason it would be deleted is its ended already negatively. You aren't going to delete something that's ended in a win. The PL probably have some fine print somewhere saying they can ignore every single one of the rules if it benefits them. Surely they'd have read all that small print BEFORE taking the case on and publicly saying they are taking the case on? 100%, surely these top lawyers don't do embarrassing shit like that all the time. The endless backtracking needed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Wraith warning - Kate Stewart's come back, considering legal action allegedly. Hahaha, I was lulled a little early on but now it's comical seeing him defend that account. "She's" his "good friend" he defended a while back Urghh man. What's this bollocks, who's she? Some twitter account that was ridiculously pro saudi about everything. Just look at the profile man, British, Saudi flags and a rose. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TRon Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 How the hell do you go from an article being taken down to ‘woe is me, it’s all over’ in the space of a few seconds?? Especially one where the speculation was that the PL might already have settled out of court. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
buzz Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Decided there’s no basis for action? Much more likely sadly. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Happinesstan Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Better call Saul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 So much wailing and gnashing of teeth at times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
thomas Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 If, even as top top lawdogs, they have reviewed the entirety of the materials/sale/etc in 36 hours and come to that conclusion that quickly then we should expect to see NUFCs internal counsel let go for gross incompetence as well. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ameritoon Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Deleting a page without a 301 redirect first is the biggest crime here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Only reason it would be deleted is its ended already negatively. You aren't going to delete something that's ended in a win. The PL probably have some fine print somewhere saying they can ignore every single one of the rules if it benefits them. Mate Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest neesy111 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Deleting a page without a 301 redirect first is the biggest crime here. Hahahaha Get their SEO sorted. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Only reason it would be deleted is its ended already negatively. You aren't going to delete something that's ended in a win. The PL probably have some fine print somewhere saying they can ignore every single one of the rules if it benefits them. I imagine you're one of those who keeps the passport in your hand at all times when at the airport Otherwise, oh my god my passport is gone!! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scotty66 Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 If, even as top top lawdogs, they have reviewed the entirety of the materials/sale/etc in 36 hours and come to that conclusion that quickly then we should expect to see NUFCs internal counsel let go for gross incompetence as well. Reaching new lows of Doomering on here. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Bonk Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Deleting a page without a 301 redirect first is the biggest crime here. Hahahaha Get their SEO sorted. Best comment of the takeover. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Scoot Posted September 17, 2020 Share Posted September 17, 2020 Bit rich coming from them leaky corrupt cunts. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts