Jump to content

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Abacus said:

If SJP Holdings is really a director, has it been assessed as such under the owners and directors test, as is supposed to happen to all directors annually?

 

Yes because Mike Ashley is the only Director of SJPH and he has been assessed. That’s the PL’s whole point.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Abacus said:

If SJP Holdings is really a director, has it been assessed as such under the owners and directors test, as is supposed to happen to all directors annually?

 

It seems that it hasn't and the PL haven't required it to until this case was brought by SJH Ltd.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The logic of this argument seems a bit flawed IMO. Being bound by only FA rules because you're 'close to the playing of the sport' surely can't hold up when you're talking about sale and purchase of £350m companies and those transactions being blocked for commercial reasons. Can't see how sporting body rules can hold up to that. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, AyeDubbleYoo said:

The logic of this argument seems a bit flawed IMO. Being bound by only FA rules because you're 'close to the playing of the sport' surely can't hold up when you're talking about sale and purchase of £350m companies and those transactions being blocked for commercial reasons. Can't see how sporting body rules can hold up to that. 

Absolutely

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...