LV Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 12 minutes ago, NEEJ said: He's literally making the same point over and over and over again, isn't he? That must be all they’ve got Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Jowell is sitting with his arms crossed now. He's had enough Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 His last point, whoop whoop! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Bet Adam Lewis spends his free time laughing at people living in poverty. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlies Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just want to hear the glass smash and see Stone Cold run in and stunner the fucker Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 look how bored Michael Cutting is Not even hiding it. Think he is playing solitaire Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just now, reefatoon said: look how bored Michael Cutting is Not even hiding it. Think he is playing solitaire He's nodded off twice. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Pokerprince2004 Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 (edited) Think the judge should have stepped in by now and told him hes just waffling like fuck and that he'd like to hear from the other parties now Edited September 29, 2021 by Pokerprince2004 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Jesus, he's only just started 'reason 2'... and he has a 'reason 3' as well! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 (edited) @Yorkie @Ashley17 @reefatoon @SUPERTOONAh okay , no wonder it was all sounding a bit one-sided. Cheers! Edited September 29, 2021 by McCormick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Corrigan Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 (edited) So reason 2 ... Edited September 29, 2021 by Corrigan Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest reefatoon Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 That's it Adam Lewis, go through it again as I didn't quite catch it the first 3021 times. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Justin Barnes lobbing in his opinions in our case, with no qualifications to make the same man who has no control over the club. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Abacus Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 If SJP Holdings is really a director, has it been assessed as such under the owners and directors test, as is supposed to happen to all directors annually? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 11 minutes ago, Rocker said: 30k at Spoons? Where abouts? Silver spoons Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just switched this on, has it been this boring for the last 2 hours? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 2 minutes ago, Abacus said: If SJP Holdings is really a director, has it been assessed as such under the owners and directors test, as is supposed to happen to all directors annually? Yes because Mike Ashley is the only Director of SJPH and he has been assessed. That’s the PL’s whole point. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fantail Breeze Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just now, 54 said: Just switched this on, has it been this boring for the last 2 hours? Absolutely. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Jackie Broon Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just now, Abacus said: If SJP Holdings is really a director, has it been assessed as such under the owners and directors test, as is supposed to happen to all directors annually? It seems that it hasn't and the PL haven't required it to until this case was brought by SJH Ltd. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
ED209 Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Will break for lunch soon, all parties will go for a cosy pint together and I will have wasted a morning of my life. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Rocker Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 1 minute ago, 54 said: Just switched this on, has it been this boring for the last 2 hours? This has been the exciting bit so far. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 The logic of this argument seems a bit flawed IMO. Being bound by only FA rules because you're 'close to the playing of the sport' surely can't hold up when you're talking about sale and purchase of £350m companies and those transactions being blocked for commercial reasons. Can't see how sporting body rules can hold up to that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
WarrenBartonCentrePartin Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just reading through pages of this thread and it sounds like we’re missing Nicholas Parsons. Should get this done in “Just a Minute” style. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Seems to me the PL have got a very flimsy argument and this fella has only got one point to argue, which is that only arbitration should be used to settle this. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted September 29, 2021 Share Posted September 29, 2021 Just now, AyeDubbleYoo said: The logic of this argument seems a bit flawed IMO. Being bound by only FA rules because you're 'close to the playing of the sport' surely can't hold up when you're talking about sale and purchase of £350m companies and those transactions being blocked for commercial reasons. Can't see how sporting body rules can hold up to that. Absolutely Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now