Ben Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 Only if the top 6 say we can Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TK-421 Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 7 minutes ago, Ben said: Only if the top 6 say we can Probably bring in a new fair sponsorship rule that no teams and/or their kit or stadia can be sponsored by an Airline, unless you already are before said ruling came into force. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 9 minutes ago, TK-421 said: Probably bring in a new fair sponsorship rule that no teams and/or their kit or stadia can be sponsored by an Airline, unless you already are before said ruling came into force. Or if dyslexics can think you're sponsored by a terroist organisation. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
prefabtoon Posted September 2, 2022 Share Posted September 2, 2022 UEFA SLAP ON THE WRIST FOR CLUBS BREACHING FFPR. I Don't know why we should worry about breaching the rules Clubs such as PSG just get a slap on the wrist what's a few million fine to them. UEFA fine eight clubs for Financial Fair Play breaches and place Man City on watchlist. UEFA say they will monitor Manchester City's finances closely this year after fining eight clubs for failing to break even with Financial Fair Play regulations. Paris Saint-Germain, Inter Milan, Juventus, Roma, AC Milan, Marseille, Monaco and Besiktas have all been fined a total of €172 million by the Club Financial Control Body for not complying with the break even requirement for the 2021/22 UEFA club competitions. Of that figure, only €26 million will be paid initially, with the rest conditional depending on each club's compliance with respective settlement agreements. Regarding City, UEFA say the Blues were 'able to technically fulfil the break-even requirement', but were reminded that from the next financial year, any help they received from Covid-19 emergency measures or historical break-even results would no longer be considered. ALSO READ: Guardiola clarifies Laporte injury absence and Akanji role at City As a result, UEFA have asked City, and 18 other clubs, for additional financial information and will monitor them closely in the next year so that they will be in compliance with the regulations moving forward. A UEFA statement said: "The CFCB First Chamber also observed that another 19 clubs that took part in the 2021/22 UEFA club competitions, namely Borussia Dortmund, Chelsea FC, FC Barcelona, FC Basel 1893, 1.FC Union Berlin, Fenerbahçe SK, Feyenoord, Leicester City FC, Manchester City FC, Olympique Lyonnais, Rangers, Real Betis Balompié, Royal Antwerp FC, Sevilla FC, SS Lazio, SSC Napoli, Trabzonspor AŞ, VFL Wolfsburg and West Ham United FC, were able to technically fulfil the break-even requirement thanks to the application of the COVID-19 emergency measures and/or because they benefited from historical positive break-even results (T-3 and T-4). "The CFCB First Chamber reminded these clubs that as from financial year 2023 these exceptional COVID deductions and consideration of historical financial results will no longer be possible. These clubs were further asked for additional financial information and will be monitored closely in the upcoming period. The goal of course is that the clubs’ overall financial situation is in compliance with the UEFA Club Licensing and Financial Sustainability Regulations– Edition 2022 in coming years." Of the eight clubs fined, PSG will have to pay the most in unconditional fines at €10m, with Roma paying €5m, Inter €4, Juventus €3.5m and AC Milan €2.5m. The remaining balances will be conditional based on settlement agreements over the next three or four years. After reading the details of the fines handed out Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
FloydianMag Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 I’m sure our owners are noting UEFA’s response’s to these clubs and the penalties for breaches of FFP should we ever find ourselves in such a position. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Shak Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Tiocfaidh ár Eitleán Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted September 3, 2022 Share Posted September 3, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Whitley mag Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
jack j Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Im sure our new 5 year deal worth 200 million will do just fine. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
David Edgar Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Miggys First Goal Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 It better be a nice looking logo. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
RodneyCisse Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Just now, Miggys First Goal said: It better be a nice looking logo. Sorry if it’s mentioned in the article but it might just be a rebrand of Saudia and if it is anything like there’s it’ll look decent. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Strawberry Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Do people get upset if they sponser the stadium and call it RIA@ST james's. If they promise to expand it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HaydnNUFC Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Personally don't ever want the stadium name touched just so we can get half of the fee for a decent midfielder. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izakaya Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 New stand naming rights at the most. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Yes, some things are sacred, it's a hugely important part of why I support Newcastle. More and more of the things I hold dear are being taken away so I'm not moving an inch on things like that. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
elbee909 Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Just change the airline name to St. James' Park. Easy. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dokko Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 15 minutes ago, elbee909 said: Just change the airline name to St. James' Park. Easy. Or SJP. Saudi Jet Planes Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BonesJones Posted September 4, 2022 Share Posted September 4, 2022 Has a little chat with Amanda from around 10 mins. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 4 hours ago, HaydnNUFC said: Personally don't ever want the stadium name touched just so we can get half of the fee for a decent midfielder. That's half a fee every season though. eg. RIA@St James' Park seems feasible. I know you and some might not be happy with that, personally I would be ok with that. We have a massive gap to bridge and I'm sure any naming of the stadium or any other infrastructure will be well thought out and communicated. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 Has this idea that we can only be sponsored the same amount as a rival ever been tested in court ? It seems very dodgy to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kazzie Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 8 hours ago, RodneyCisse said: Sorry if it’s mentioned in the article but it might just be a rebrand of Saudia and if it is anything like there’s it’ll look decent. Article makes it sound like SAUDIA and RIA will be two seperate entities. 'Sources close to the PIF told Arabian Business that “RIA” is being tipped as the name for the new carrier. Once launched, it will become Saudi’s second national carrier, based out of Riyadh. The current SAUDIA operates from Jeddah.' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 6 hours ago, BonesJones said: Has a little chat with Amanda from around 10 mins. He’s great him, Adam P take note! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Groundhog63 Posted September 5, 2022 Share Posted September 5, 2022 17 minutes ago, HTT II said: He’s great him, Adam P take note! He's canny enough. Certainly a tad more eloquent than young Pearson but then again that's a low bar. On that note I was listening to Radio1 on Bank Holiday Monday morning only to hear, the rather easy on the ear, Emil Franchi. Canny step up from navigating his way through interviews with pissed up mags outside the ground on matchdays ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now