et tu brute Posted Thursday at 14:11 Share Posted Thursday at 14:11 Just now, Nucasol said: Rapey Exile? Brian Griffin or Skylon I reckon as they talk utter shite also Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nucasol Posted Thursday at 14:13 Share Posted Thursday at 14:13 Just now, et tu brute said: Brian Griffin or Skylon I reckon as they talk utter shite also Potentially, if they can find time away from plotting to abduct and molest Holly Willoughby, the pair of deviant whoppers. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted Thursday at 14:20 Share Posted Thursday at 14:20 8 minutes ago, Nucasol said: Rapey Exile? Nah he's just a downright degenerate. I can't remember his username now but he always supposedly had the inside scoops on financial deals, which is easy when they're completely fabricated by a sad old man. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Charlies Posted Thursday at 14:24 Share Posted Thursday at 14:24 Grumpy old man? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
NE27 Posted Thursday at 14:35 Share Posted Thursday at 14:35 11 minutes ago, Charlies said: Grumpy old man? Could be him. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheBrownBottle Posted Thursday at 15:26 Share Posted Thursday at 15:26 2 hours ago, gdm said: They sold their shares to PIF. One of the richest people in football. How are you spinning that in to a bad thing? Is this confirmed? Hadn’t seen who they sold their shares to (likely I missed it) Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Thursday at 15:31 Share Posted Thursday at 15:31 4 minutes ago, TheBrownBottle said: Is this confirmed? Hadn’t seen who they sold their shares to (likely I missed it) Widely reported I think but not confirmed Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted Thursday at 15:44 Share Posted Thursday at 15:44 Does that dopey Makem think PCP are PIF ? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted Thursday at 15:45 Share Posted Thursday at 15:45 13 minutes ago, gdm said: Widely reported I think but not confirmed None of it has been confirmed even though we know it's happening Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted Thursday at 15:46 Share Posted Thursday at 15:46 1 minute ago, Ben said: Does that dopey Makem think PCP are PIF ? Probably Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted Thursday at 15:48 Share Posted Thursday at 15:48 3 minutes ago, Ben said: Does that dopey Makem think PCP are PIF ? Judging by their thread of rtg I think they all do Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted Thursday at 15:50 Share Posted Thursday at 15:50 Are the rumours of the Alnick transfer meeting correct or is it ITK nonsense? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Gaztoon Posted Thursday at 15:50 Share Posted Thursday at 15:50 Reading the gobshite.. he clearly thinks PCP is PIF and that staveley is PIF 🤣🤣 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted Thursday at 15:57 Share Posted Thursday at 15:57 6 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Are the rumours of the Alnick transfer meeting correct or is it ITK nonsense? Pearson had a screenshot from Staveley's social media saying it was happening, so I presume it is Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TheHoob Posted Thursday at 16:03 Share Posted Thursday at 16:03 Crumpy had them all sending off letters to Companies House because he thought he'd seen an issue with our paperwork which meant the takeover shouldn't happen Yet loads of them still seem to hang off his every word. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
et tu brute Posted Thursday at 16:06 Share Posted Thursday at 16:06 (edited) 1 hour ago, Charlies said: Grumpy old man? Could be his PhD son he kept bringing up as his imaginary font of all knowledge Edited Thursday at 16:07 by et tu brute Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Kid Icarus Posted Thursday at 16:11 Share Posted Thursday at 16:11 Molehills they can manifest into mountains are their mardi gras now, they have absolutely nothing left. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hudson Posted Thursday at 20:43 Share Posted Thursday at 20:43 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Numbers Posted Thursday at 20:57 Share Posted Thursday at 20:57 7 hours ago, rutland said: Just from the thread. Never mind not having the money to invest further, PCP don't have the money to keep the 6% they had. Thick as mince. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BonesJones Posted Thursday at 20:59 Share Posted Thursday at 20:59 Anyone fancy explaining to me like I'm five, why a co owner has to put money in because another does? Honestly clueless on this stuff, I just like football. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted Thursday at 21:03 Share Posted Thursday at 21:03 1 minute ago, BonesJones said: Anyone fancy explaining to me like I'm five, why a co owner has to put money in because another does? Honestly clueless on this stuff, I just like football. If you and a mate buy a car together. Then you both agree to swap out the engine and stereo, but your mate pays for all of it. He now has invested more than you in said car, and thus owns a greater share in the car. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
madras Posted Thursday at 21:04 Share Posted Thursday at 21:04 Just now, Nobody said: If you and a mate buy a car together. Then you both agree to swap out the engine and stereo, but your mate pays for all of it. He now has invested more than you in said car, and thus owns a greater share in the car. Oooh well put. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
morpeth mag Posted Thursday at 21:11 Share Posted Thursday at 21:11 8 minutes ago, Nobody said: If you and a mate buy a car together. Then you both agree to swap out the engine and stereo, but your mate pays for all of it. He now has invested more than you in said car, and thus owns a greater share in the car. What if your mate is a tyre kicker? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BonesJones Posted Thursday at 22:12 Share Posted Thursday at 22:12 (edited) 1 hour ago, Nobody said: If you and a mate buy a car together. Then you both agree to swap out the engine and stereo, but your mate pays for all of it. He now has invested more than you in said car, and thus owns a greater share in the car. So am I right thinking, if PIF put 100m in for example Amanda and Mehrdad would have to put in 6%(?) of that currently? Which they can't afford. Edited Thursday at 22:12 by BonesJones Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted Thursday at 22:12 Share Posted Thursday at 22:12 1 hour ago, Nobody said: If you and a mate buy a car together. Then you both agree to swap out the engine and stereo, but your mate pays for all of it. He now has invested more than you in said car, and thus owns a greater share in the car. Right okay, I understand - but why does it mean I, the poorer mate, should or would want to to get out entirely? What's wrong for PCP and everyone with PCP's % just getting lower (I assume though the % is getting less, its actual value is the same or more)? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now