Jump to content

PIF, PCP, and RB Sports & Media


Recommended Posts

4 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Lost now, like. Dunno what he's going on about. 

 

Basically NUFC have agreed to and are therefore bound by the PL and FA rules which state arbitration is the sole method of settling disputes like this. 


He’s just reading the rules and past examples.

 

Will be surprised if this doesn’t get paused for arbitration imo.

Link to post
Share on other sites
Just now, Fantail Breeze said:

 

Because Ashley is using SJHL to skip past arbitration and go straight to CAT. 

 

He's trying to argue that they have to be a controlling party even though they are not a named director, feels like a feeble argument, by rule of law surely it should only be counted as a controlling party if it is written into the contract.

Link to post
Share on other sites
  • Rich changed the title to PIF, PCP, and RB Sports & Media inject a further £38.5M to cover day-to-day running costs (The Athletic)
  • Rich changed the title to PIF, PCP, and RB Sports & Media

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...