Jump to content

Recommended Posts

36 minutes ago, arnonel said:

Also dont understand Shelvey in his role. 
He is one of the best passers in the league, but is being used in DM role playing short simple passes.
If he is going to be used in the team, at least use his strengths and try negate the weaknesses

 

 

 

Think that's the biggest myth in football, personally.

Link to post
Share on other sites

38 minutes ago, arnonel said:

Also dont understand Shelvey in his role. 
He is one of the best passers in the league, but is being used in DM role playing short simple passes.
If he is going to be used in the team, at least use his strengths and try negate the weaknesses

 

 

I really don’t think he’s one of the best passers in the league like.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Shelvy is a great passer in a shite team who can't pass. Remember his debut he hit 2 Cross field diagonal balls he looked amazing and the crowd were giving it the Gary neville orgasms but that was only cause we had years of shite football no1 had done it in so long. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Gazzaschicken said:

Shelvy is a great passer in a shite team who can't pass. Remember his debut he hit 2 Cross field diagonal balls he looked amazing and the crowd were giving it the Gary neville orgasms but that was only cause we had years of shite football no1 had done it in so long. 

Long passing is bread and butter for any top level central midfielder like. 
 

You could argue he has an eye for a pass but then I look at his assist and key passes and it also doesn’t seem to add up. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, ManDoon said:

I think one game is a pretty poor sample size. Also Leeds drag your players all over the shop. He should do the same when we play Leeds again.

 

Pretty sure there was one after our first 3-4 games and the average positions of players was generally a good bit higher up the pitch and we seemed to have a bit more shape and structure.  Which isn't really that surprising.   

 

It does work both ways, of course.  Everyone who is going on about the results, possession, xG, goals scored and conceded etc compared to Bruce.  They are also using a small sample size and not factoring in the strength of opposition that we have faced for more than half of those league games. 

 

Such small margins at this level.  Hang on against Man U, Norwich and Watford and we are a bit more clinical in those games and we could have been 6 points better off.  Brentford felt like points dropped and all.  There is a theme here, mind.  We can't protect a lead.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, ManDoon said:

Yes, relying on a dog shit midfield and only using one to protect the back four is inanity. 4-2-3-1 is the only way

 

I also think this.  But then it did feel like he started 4-4-1-1/4-2-3-1.  Then realised the midfield options were so bad and ASM was so allergic to even attempting to cover.  That we went with this 4-3-3, after stumbling upon Joelinton being good in that left centre role.  Winning the ball and releasing it early to ASM, whilst also covering the left back for him.    

 

I was having a bit of a back and forth with someone on Twitter.  Who seemed to be suggesting our midfield was poor, because they have to protect the back 4 so much.  So they can't push on and be creative.  I think there would be an element of truth in that if they were screening the centre backs and doing a lot of donkey work at the back.  But they're currently fucking invisible and don't influence the game at either end of the pitch, or the middle, funnily enough.  They are utter dogshit and so depressing to watch. 

 

Not sure we have the personnel for 4-2-3-1 right now.  But I would really like to see it.  As this 4-3-3 seems a good idea in games where we won't see a lot of the ball.  But absolutely toothless the last two games, where the onus was on us to attack.  Wood looked horrendously isolated for most of that game Saturday. 

 

 

Edited by Lush Vlad

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, arnonel said:

Also dont understand Shelvey in his role. 
He is one of the best passers in the league, but is being used in DM role playing short simple passes.
If he is going to be used in the team, at least use his strengths and try negate the weaknesses

 

 

 

I think he's played deep so he doesn't have to run much. We've seen when he gets caught up the pitch he ends up fouling or pulling players down because he knows there's no way he's catching them. It was the same with Colback. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

7 minutes ago, ManDoon said:

I personally would go for a mid 3 of Shelvey/Staff sitting. And willock (yea I know but he can score we’ve seem that) in the ten. 

 

I'm not against that.  Willock back in a more favourable role might see him contribute, who knows.  We certainly need someone closer to the striker.  

 

I think I'd even look at Hendrick in the midfield 2 now.  It's that desperate :lol:   I think Shelvey and Longstaff are starting under Howe, regardless.  We need at least one new CM in this window, or we're certainly going down, I reckon.  Even two new CB's wouldn't change my mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

18 minutes ago, ManDoon said:

I personally would go for a mid 3 of Shelvey/Staff sitting. And willock (yea I know but he can score we’ve seem that) in the ten. 

Yeah, although I think I would play Almiron instead of Willock to be honest. Willock looks like someone who's having real problems to me. Maybe being away from home has affected him, I dunno. 

 

Longstaff - Shelvey

Fraser - Almiron - ASM

Wood

The midfield isn't great, but if we have two sitters and Miggy's running we really should be harder to play through.

 

Edit: I've forgotten Joelinton. No idea where he fits in here mind. 

 

 

Edited by Smal

Link to post
Share on other sites

Maybe big Jo is a tactical enough player to be able to play as part of a pivot, I dunno. I somehow forgot about him. He's surprised everyone by being able to play as a mid so he probably could. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, ManDoon said:

He might work really well in that almost 10 role, he’s got a very good pass on him, reads the game well 

It’s took 2 1/2 seasons to finally find his best position and you want to move him? ?

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Smal said:

Yeah, although I think I would play Almiron instead of Willock to be honest. Willock looks like someone who's having real problems to me. Maybe being away from home has affected him, I dunno. 

 

Longstaff - Shelvey

Fraser - Almiron - ASM

Wood

The midfield isn't great, but if we have two sitters and Miggy's running we really should be harder to play through.

 

Edit: I've forgotten Joelinton. No idea where he fits in here mind. 

 

 

 

 

You've got Almiron in there, I'd have him nowhere near the team, never mind ahead of Joelinton. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, r0cafella said:

He’s the third wheel is Jones. Only still in a job because the owners insisted. 

He’ll be gone at the end of the season!

Link to post
Share on other sites

35 minutes ago, WarrenBartonCentrePartin said:


Yep. Spent most of the warmup on Saturday with one foot on a football just chatting. Also noticed Tindall’s hands must be glued inside his pockets.

2-C1-BB4-CF-D999-4435-897-F-380-F18829-F

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...