Jump to content

Do you still back Eddie Howe?  

735 members have voted

  1. 1. ?

    • Yes
      117
    • No
      92


Recommended Posts

8 minutes ago, timeEd32 said:

 

Oh I forgot about the 5-1. Yes, Shola's goal when the header came off the bar to make it 4 is up there for me.

 

That celebration where he goes to the corner with his arms in the air and the camera pans around him is iconic for me. 

Also always made me chuckle the way he celebrated goals with that nonchalant chest pat and arm out to one side with the confidence like it was just another day at the office. Guy was such an inconsistent frustrating player, but would occasionally score a belter and celebrate as if he does it all the time :lol:
image.thumb.png.c8e3e6f719147445f3ee5c41236eb334.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 04/03/2026 at 22:36, dcmk said:

Ah, so good to have another reprieve from  having to witness @Sir Joel Inton being miserable and over dramatic in here for a few days at least.

 

Eddie is tremendous.

 

He got it completely spot on yesterday from start to finish. Usually his in game management is an issue but his reaction to the red and late changes (both personnel and tactically) got us the win.

 

Sorry to break your heart but thanks again for thinking about me.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The 6-0 vs Villa was brilliant as well, for us to smash the club that had laughed at us so soon after bouncing back was immense. Carroll hatrick suggested the emergence of a new Geordie number 9 legend although we all know what happened next. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 hours ago, Cort said:

Smacking Bruce's Sunderland around on Halloween has to be in there.

The only Bruce related match I’d include.

 

Remember how rattled he was about the song they played at the end :lol:

 

Away end at their place “Brucey where’s ya song. Brucey Brucey where’s ya song?”

Link to post
Share on other sites

16 hours ago, The College Dropout said:

I love Shola man [emoji38]

 

I can't stand him. Moreso after coming out to bat for Ashley. A shit player who contributed near fuck all in the eons he seemed to be here.

 

KK had the right idea when he binned him out on loan to Stoke.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I like the man Shola but it says a lot about how the club was operated during the Ashley regime that he was kept on and on, playing close to 30 games season after season whilst obviously not being up to standard. Was very frustrating and depressing at the time. Rewarding loyalty rather than ability and contribution on the pitch.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just thought I'd share something with you all. I was talking to a Man U supporter a few days ago, and when I told him I supported Newcastle, he said, 'Oh hard luck'. Now in my 60 years of following our club, I've often had to take that comment on the chin and smile gamely. Not this time. I told him we weren't losers any more and that I was looking forward to the future.

 

It was a spontaneous, natural response and I put it down to our great manager.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can forgive Shola for trapping a ball further than he could ever pass it, but …

 

“You look at the amounts of money you need to pay to buy superstars now….Mike Ashley has come out and said he hasn’t got the funds to do that…to compete with Manchester City and Liverpool.

“He is a businessman, and unfortunately for the Newcastle fans, he wants to run his business in a way that is sustainable.

“Credit to Mike Ashley…because you look at the likes of Aston Villa, and these clubs who are struggling financially.

“The one thing that Mike Ashley has done for Newcastle over these last ten years, is to stabilise the club – where the club is running itself and we’ve got no debt.

“That’s credit to Mike Ashley but obviously fans of a football team want to progress year on year, they want to see big players.

“We can be quietly happy with our business”

 

I always felt that ‘we can’t compete with Liverpool and Man City’ cop-out in a Geordie accent was catnip to the press.  So testicles to him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, TheBrownBottle said:

I can forgive Shola for trapping a ball further than he could ever pass it, but …

 

“You look at the amounts of money you need to pay to buy superstars now….Mike Ashley has come out and said he hasn’t got the funds to do that…to compete with Manchester City and Liverpool.

“He is a businessman, and unfortunately for the Newcastle fans, he wants to run his business in a way that is sustainable.

“Credit to Mike Ashley…because you look at the likes of Aston Villa, and these clubs who are struggling financially.

“The one thing that Mike Ashley has done for Newcastle over these last ten years, is to stabilise the club – where the club is running itself and we’ve got no debt.

“That’s credit to Mike Ashley but obviously fans of a football team want to progress year on year, they want to see big players.

“We can be quietly happy with our business”

 

I always felt that ‘we can’t compete with Liverpool and Man City’ cop-out in a Geordie accent was catnip to the press.  So testicles to him. 

Yes, plus we did have debt. It was c£130m of loans due to MA personally. Its still classed as debt/liabilities on the balance sheet, even if its owed to a related party. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, 500bhp said:

Yes, plus we did have debt. It was c£130m of loans due to MA personally. Its still classed as debt/liabilities on the balance sheet, even if its owed to a related party. 

100% we did.  It was him regurgitating the same old bollocks.  Ask the current owners how much debt we had - they had to pay it off as part of the purchase of the club.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Nine said:

IMG_1515.jpeg

 

We will play a minimum of 58 games this season. Our squad is not deep enough to play that much football at a high level.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Bonk said:

 

We will play a minimum of 58 games this season. Our squad is not deep enough to play that much football at a high level.

I've said it before but by the time we play the Mackems we will have played something like 16 more games than them. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, The Bonk said:

 

We will play a minimum of 58 games this season. Our squad is not deep enough to play that much football at a high level.

 

 

Well at least we won't have that problem next season. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If we get in Europe and do well in all competitions we just might play that many again. Forest are on 41 and they went out in the 3rd round of both domestic cups.

Link to post
Share on other sites

56 minutes ago, TRon said:

 

 

Well at least we won't have that problem next season. 


Might not be a bad thing as we need some recalibration Eddie hasn’t been able to do on the training ground.

 

Im fine without Europe next year, we’ll most likely play some form of it the year after.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Sometimes wonder how much Eddie and the lads have added to the local economy this season through their exploits.

 

It can’t be far off hundreds of billions.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Watching the latest presser. You'd think these journos had never heard him field a question before at times, let alone spent the last four years with him. That one from Damien Spellman asking how we compare to Man City. Surely you know by this point he doesn't think like that at all? 

 

Then you've got poor old Lee Ryder asking for a Woltemade update seconds after he just gave one.

 

Gaggle of dimwits. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

19 minutes ago, Yorkie said:

Watching the latest presser. You'd think these journos had never heard him field a question before at times, let alone spent the last four years with him. That one from Damien Spellman asking how we compare to Man City. Surely you know by this point he doesn't think like that at all? 

 

Then you've got poor old Lee Ryder asking for a Woltemade update seconds after he just gave one.

 

Gaggle of dimwits. 


Honestly Ryder is hilarious, proper competition winner.

Link to post
Share on other sites

And when people take the piss in the Comments section, he's dumb enough to come on there and reply.

 

 

 

@kevinmolloy9134

13 hours ago

Lee ryder masterclass in being a laughing stock hats off

 

@BrianMoorhead

12 hours ago

Give the man a break...it's a tough job bring a reporter and he was quite clearly having a nap.

 

@segedunumSE

12 hours ago

EVERY week he asks something stupid. Thick as mince.

 

@LeeRyder

12 hours ago

 @segedunumSE  No, you are allowed to ask follow up questions on the same subject. Have a nice day.

 

@segedunumSE

12 hours ago

 @LeeRyder  It's every week man. Just look Eddie's face when you're asking your questions.

 

@LeeRyder

12 hours ago

 @segedunumSE  I've got a good rapport with him. Guess you don't see everything. All the best and thanks for showing an interest. Take care.

 

@kevgeordie1

11 hours ago

 @LeeRyder  they’ve got to have someone to pick on this lot, you do a great job Lee keep it up

 

@glynhayes5930

9 hours ago

I wana know the mans secret. He's been making a reasonable living out of it for years. That is an admirable achievement in itself.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, The Bonk said:

Why he’s shown up in the comments in itself is ridiculous, but at least he’s quite cordial. [emoji38] 

 

Still a dimwit mind you.

Much prefer Baldwards, on the vino, throwing keyboard haymakers tbf

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...