Hanshithispantz Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 (edited) 4 minutes ago, The Prophet said: Why would Barbosa be the better deal? He was absolute shite at Inter. I get why people would prefer an exotic signing in the hopes we bag the next Aguero but it's probably more likely that they turn out to be fucking rubbish Edited January 9, 2022 by Hanshithispantz Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 50 minutes ago, ManDoon said: May as well get Mitro back if we want Wood Would deffinitely take Mitro over him like Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 1 minute ago, worthy said: He might not be, but he is way more worth the chance than an old shitter from Burnley, Also he didnt really get the chance at Inter so thats just silly. Wood clearly isn't shit though and is far less risky than Barbosa. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Just now, ManDoon said: 17m is an actual liberty if they are asking that Agree with this mind. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 (edited) 10 minutes ago, gallowgate said: Where do you get the 1 in 3 striker from? He's played 21 times this season and scored only three goals.... he's fukking cr@p and not the answer. I would have expected this from Ashley, certainly not from Yasir Al-Rumayyan. Why do you think Burnley fans want rid..... not because he's class... 155 games in the premier league and 50 odd goals according to the PL website. Also he’s scored double-digits every season since 2017 apparently. They can fuck off for 17.5 million though. No chance. Edited January 9, 2022 by McCormick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Wood isn't the long term answer but buying him would probably be a good idea on two counts. Would improve our striker situation and would take an important player off a direct relegation rival. It's like when Man City kept buying Arsenal's best players Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 2 minutes ago, McCormick said: 155 games in the premier league and 50 odd goals according to the PL website. Also he’s scored double-digits every season since 2017 apparently. They can fuck off for 17.5 million though. No chance. Very similar goal scoring record to Wilson in the PL. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 (edited) Think you lot getting worked up over nothing over Wood tbh Edited January 9, 2022 by Slim Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dandy Man Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Not crazy about Wood and definitely not at 17m but he can do a job in short term and we would've been getting likes of Kuqi in this situation in past so I guess it's progress of sorts Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Guest HTT II Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Wood be good in the Championship… Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Bada Bing Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Think he would be ideal to cover for Wilson. Not a flashy signing but it doesn’t need to be we are in a scrap. He occupies defenders and should create space for ASM and Fraser etc. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 £17m isn't even bad for a 1 in 3 striker off a relegation rival. He's probably worth more like £30m to them Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Lush Vlad Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 12 minutes ago, triggs said: It's like when Man City kept buying Arsenal's best players Good analogy TBF. Is Newcastle/Burnley the Poundland version? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Hanshithispantz Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 5 minutes ago, triggs said: £17m isn't even bad for a 1 in 3 striker off a relegation rival. He's probably worth more like £30m to them He's not scoring for them this season like and they could probably invest that £17m on someone better. Like I say I do think he'd be a good signing for us though Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Stottie Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Wood has 3 from 5 xG this year, so he's getting into positions but may have missed a couple. Reassuringly, Cornet has 6 goals from 1.5 xG, and that scoring rate won't continue. Based on this, taking away Wood may hurt Burnley more than their fans currently realize. That all said, I suspect the club we need to finish above is Watford, not Burnley. 17 million is too much, and I would rather take a punt on Diaz. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
r0cafella Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 We would be spending 17.5 mil for a player who would play for 8 weeks? Wilson is a much better player imo and we need someone at least on his level to come in. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mazzy Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 As much as this signing wouldn't excite me, I do see the logic in it. However Burnley would surely not let him leave in January and especially not to us. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
triggs Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 5 minutes ago, Lush Vlad said: Good analogy TBF. Is Newcastle/Burnley the Poundland version? Aye Even before Arsenal, they bought Villa and Everton's best players like Lescott, Barry and Milner Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
JonBez comesock Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Wood is an Ashley signing Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
McCormick Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 (edited) If we can get this over the line in a day or two then I can see it as a pricey panicky solution for Watford. No point waiting weeks for a better option only for our situation to be unsalvageable by then. 17.5 seems awfully steep though Edited January 9, 2022 by McCormick Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Definitely agree with the, content with Wood, but not for the best part of twenty million quid line of thinking. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
geordie_b Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Wood would be a huge focal point for the team to buzz round, if we had him yesterday we win the game by 4 or 5 goals Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dr Jinx Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Bit of Daryl Murphy deja vu. But that didn’t end up too bad iirc Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ikon Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 Just now, geordie_b said: Wood would be a huge focal point for the team to buzz round, if we had him yesterday we win the game by 4 or 5 goals We don't play Cambridge every time though. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
LV Posted January 9, 2022 Share Posted January 9, 2022 As @Mikeput it yesterday (albeit regarding Willock), somebody should be in jail if they spend £17m on Chris Wood. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts