Jump to content

Realistic Transfer Targets (2023/24)


joeyt

Recommended Posts

2 minutes ago, Holmesy said:

Surprised Hojberg hasn’t been mentioned as a possibility. Spurs looking to get rid, 18 months left on his contract, pure #6 but still contributes going forward. What would he cost? £10m?

Portably would cost more than that EPl tax is real plus almost 29 so no resale value. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Holmesy said:

Surprised Hojberg hasn’t been mentioned as a possibility. Spurs looking to get rid, 18 months left on his contract, pure #6 but still contributes going forward. What would he cost? £10m?

Similar issue to Phillips no? Fairly big fee, fairly big wages, low resale value. Not as bad.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, The College Dropout said:

Similar issue to Phillips no? Fairly big fee, fairly big wages, low resale value. Not as bad.

Spurs have paid pretty low wages historically so he'd probably fit into our structure. Apparently Spurs don't want a loan, so it would be a straight transfer.

Seems like a much lower risk option to Phillips, without a huge drop-off in quality. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 15/01/2024 at 14:09, Ikon said:

Not sure if he has signed a new contract yet or not. Seems to have everything but shooting quality (yet) and not expensive.  Would be perfect. 

 

 

 


Even if he did sign a new contract he won’t cost much

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Holmesy said:

Spurs have paid pretty low wages historically so he'd probably fit into our structure. Apparently Spurs don't want a loan, so it would be a straight transfer.

Seems like a much lower risk option to Phillips, without a huge drop-off in quality. 

Google search suggests he earns over £100k p/w. It's a lot for a back-up midfielder for us.

 

Spurs wage bill is considerably larger than ours which is probably why we didn't sign Maddison.

 

 

Edited by The College Dropout

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

Jordan Henderson has had his contract terminated. He’s free to move on. Wonder if we look at it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Quote

 


Chelsea are willing to let striker Armando Broja leave on a permanent basis, provided a suitable offer is received, says The Athletic's David Ornstein.  There is interest from a number of clubs in the 22-year-old Albania international including Fulham, West Ham, and Wolves

 

 

Would anyone take him here? I've never really rated him

 

 

Edited by joeyt

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think Broja has a lot of talent but the injuries stunted his progress a bit.

 

Not too dissimilar to what happened with Livramento at Chelsea.

 

Could see him flourish in the right environment.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joeyt said:

 

Would anyone take him here? I've never really rated him

 

 

 

He’s one of the fastest players in the PL and a bit of unit. If he can fully recover from his injury, £35m could turn out to be a bargain. Long term Wilson replacement possibly.
We’ve been strongly linked with him before haven’t we? 

 

 

Edited by Holmesy

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, joeyt said:

 

Would anyone take him here? I've never really rated him

 

 

 

Really rated him in his Southampton breakthrough season. He’s looked atrocious when I’ve seen him for Chelsea though. Wonder if the injury has done him in 

Link to post
Share on other sites

If Isak has a weak link it can be his link up play with his back to goal. I think his best position would be behind another physical striker. Broja on paper would be really good for this or to use in a rotation with Isak

 

Just not sure how good he is

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, gbandit said:

Chelsea value him at £50m [emoji38] aye, because they add an extra 50% minimum when they’re buying players. I’d say he’s worth £25m currently 

 

My God ... they're not really looking for £50 million are they?! 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Chelsea looking for top value from their homegrown players in Gallagher, Broja and Hall.

 

Makes sense if someone is willing to buy them for huge fees

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 hours ago, The College Dropout said:

Google search suggests he earns over £100k p/w. It's a lot for a back-up midfielder for us.

 

Spurs wage bill is considerably larger than ours which is probably why we didn't sign Maddison.

 


If that’s what he earns it’s a lot for a back-up midfielder for anyone, that’s partly why he’s available. I really like him but suspect he will go abroad.

 

You didn’t sign Maddison for more reasons than that :lol:

 

 

Edited by leffe186

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...