Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, Ikon said:

Remember when we were heavily linked with one injury prone player and so many on here said “if our medical team think they can turn him around then I trust them”  :lol: Not saying that our medical team is shite but I never want to see us go for injury prone players,  as it’s like asking for problems. 

Arsenal LB wasn’t it? Forgot his name

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Lush Vlad said:

I guess because Botman is such a machine. He has great strength and support through his legs and it would be hard to pick up. For him and the medical team. 
 

Strange he didn’t go for a precautionary scan, mind. 

 

Cat scan?

Link to post
Share on other sites

My knee kept swelling despite physio treatment, so had an MRI, meniscus tear was visible, am having an arthroscopy to fix it 

 

It’s just a standard investigation route for knee problems  

 

If he’s not had an MRI then that’d be wild 

Link to post
Share on other sites

  • 3 weeks later...

You can see the logic with a Bruno sale (brought in at what looks like a bargain price, 27 this year and unlikely to ever command more than what he could bring in this summer), but a sale of Botman or Isak would truly be in “what’s the point of it all?” territory. Not that I think it’s likely mind. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

52 minutes ago, The Prophet said:

Surely one of our "untouchables".

Until the last few days, I thought that might've been the other way around. I've never really bought into the crown jewels thing over the past couple of years, as a kind of preventative psychological defence mechanism. But with the moves that seem to be going on, it's looking good.

Link to post
Share on other sites

44 minutes ago, Paulinho said:

You can see the logic with a Bruno sale (brought in at what looks like a bargain price, 27 this year and unlikely to ever command more than what he could bring in this summer), but a sale of Botman or Isak would truly be in “what’s the point of it all?” territory. Not that I think it’s likely mind. 

 

I love the random quoting of ages in transfer chat. He's 27, means he only has about 8 years left as a top player? :lol:

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

I love the random quoting of ages in transfer chat. He's 27, means he only has about 8 years left as a top player? :lol:


I can’t think of a way to explain to you, without being incredibly patronising, why being 27 is very different to being 30 in the context of football transfers. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

I love the random quoting of ages in transfer chat. He's 27, means he only has about 8 years left as a top player? :lol:

 

In terms of years remaining as a player he's still pretty young. But in terms of a big transfer fee his age is very relevant. 

 

Ronaldo, Kane, and Neymar are the only players ever to go for over £75m past the age of 30. Even at 27/28 you don't have more than a handful - Griezmann, Coutinho, Lukaku, Hazard ... that might be it?

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...