Jump to content

Recommended Posts

1 hour ago, The Butcher said:

He's given it away loads in very dangerous areas this season tbh, but we've hardly ever been punished.

 

 

He gives it away because he's trying to create space tbf, today he got isolated by the Arsenal pack too many times, think he could have done with better support from others around him. Although no excuse for the goal, that was just a really bad touch, and an equally bad foul following it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I do think our centre mids have been hung out to dry a bit with the January window, looking back, considering how we play the game at such intensity.

 

Obviously, we've still done so well but there's been so few options to rotate that fatigue, whether mental or physical, has crept in a few times in the second half of the season.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, aussiemag said:

Would it be worth giving Anderson a run in the Longstaff role. He seems to have a good engine. Middle 3 of Anderson, Bruno and Willock. Front 3 of Joelinton, Isak, Almiron 

Hard to tell, didn’t he play that role against Sheffield Wednesday in the cup? He was really poor in that game.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon
2 hours ago, STM said:

He played 8 last year and was class. He also believes he's a number 8.

 

He might be wrong and you might be right though.


he played just as many games last season in the position he is in now as he did further forward.

 

 

Edited by reefatoon

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest reefatoon

Just looked back through and from his full debut v Southampton, he played 6 games without Shelvey where he was the deeper player and 5 with Shelvey. So he was class playing in the role he is now.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Displayname said:

Still boggles my mind that we spent 40m on a talented winger where we already had more than enough cover, and not a penny on cover for Bruno.

That was my concern at the time. Not buying Gordon. Just only buying Gordon. The squad has been a quality midfielder short all season.

 

Bruno has been playing injured since Fulham.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Displayname said:

Still boggles my mind that we spent 40m on a talented winger where we already had more than enough cover, and not a penny on cover for Bruno.

 

The club have said it was because none of their primary targets were available.

Link to post
Share on other sites

The only real worry to me re Bruno is that he seems to have forgotten how to shoot.  He hasn’t scored in six months and some of the efforts he’s producing are simply shite.

 

His ability to retain the ball while drawing players in usually creates space in midfield or draws fouls - though against the very best sides that is fraught with danger, and I suspect a lot of teams have now worked out some elements of dealing with him in that regard - he was making similar errors in retaining the ball too long against Southampton last week (and has for some time).

 

The lad is likely knackered and a bit out of form tbf.  Ideally we’d rest him for a game or two - but of course we don’t yet have the squad depth.  I also think that the Willock-Bruno-Joelinton midfield is repeatedly being shown not to be our most effective - Longstaff plays such an important role in there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 hours ago, ExiledGeordie said:


We’re going to see this more and more as we’re successful. Some will quickly forget where we’ve come from.

 

Yeah that's what worries me, instant success, there will likely be those that would call for Howes head if we didn't manage to get the top four.

Link to post
Share on other sites

24 minutes ago, mighty__mag said:

 

He's been fucking mint all season, there's an observation ? 


Exactly, people have bad games. I do think his ankle has been hampering him, he looks like he’s lost some pace since the injury. That’s not an excuse for today but possibly a contributing factor. He just made too many mistakes in possession today but I think we badly suffered from Longstaffs absence and it highlights the need for a number 6 type player or another option to Longstaff. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Think if we could sign someone like Rice (pipe dream) to go alongside Joelinton as our main press, it could help protect Bruno in the deeper role dictating play without having to use as much energy. Get him doing what he does best. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

25 minutes ago, nufcnick said:

You guys have to remember, he’s basically running around on 1 leg and needs an ankle operation. I really don’t think he’s doing that bad considering the circumstances


I think this is important, he’s definitely playing below 100% because of the ankle 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ha! So Bruno isn't good enough to play against the top teams now, yeah?! Man, the fickle nature of of "supporters".

 

Anyway ... tough game for Bruno yesterday, and a harsh lesson learned going up against teams that press aggressively. Have to be more disciplined and not dwell on the ball unnecessarily.

 

This is something that he can get away with against most teams in the league the majority of the time, but he just needs to learn to make the necessary adjustment against this type of opposition.

 

A big part of him being the excellent player he is, is his willingness to receive the ball in tight areas, and not rush things in those instances, however, against certain teams he needs to keep things simpler and move the ball on quicker in order to beat the press.

 

Arsenal I thought, clearly targeted him specifically to cut off our build up play from the back, and he should have clocked onto that, and moved the ball quicker to get the better of them.

 

He'll be fine. No doubt about it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, KaKa said:

Ha! So Bruno isn't good enough to play against the top teams now, yeah?! Man, the fickle nature of of "supporters".

 

Anyway ... tough game for Bruno yesterday, and a harsh lesson learned going up against teams that press aggressively. Have to be more disciplined and not dwell on the ball unnecessarily.

 

This is something that he can get away with against most teams in the league the majority of the time, but he just needs to learn to make the necessary adjustment against this type of opposition.

 

A big part of him being the excellent player he is, is his willingness to receive the ball in tight areas, and not rush things in those instances, however, against certain teams he needs to keep things simpler and move the ball on quicker in order to beat the press.

 

Arsenal I thought, clearly targeted him specifically to cut off our build up play from the back, and he should have clocked onto that, and moved the ball quicker to get the better of them.

 

He'll be fine. No doubt about it.

 

I suggested that it's games like this where we need another number 6, so we can free Bruno up and give the opposition something different to think about.

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, KaKa said:

Ha! So Bruno isn't good enough to play against the top teams now, yeah?! Man, the fickle nature of of "supporters".

 

Anyway ... tough game for Bruno yesterday, and a harsh lesson learned going up against teams that press aggressively. Have to be more disciplined and not dwell on the ball unnecessarily.

 

This is something that he can get away with against most teams in the league the majority of the time, but he just needs to learn to make the necessary adjustment against this type of opposition.

 

A big part of him being the excellent player he is, is his willingness to receive the ball in tight areas, and not rush things in those instances, however, against certain teams he needs to keep things simpler and move the ball on quicker in order to beat the press.

 

Arsenal I thought, clearly targeted him specifically to cut off our build up play from the back, and he should have clocked onto that, and moved the ball quicker to get the better of them.

 

He'll be fine. No doubt about it.

Who said Bruno isn’t good enough to play against the big sides? Am I missing something. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, The Prophet said:

 

The club have said it was because none of their primary targets were available.

Didnt have to be a primary target. All we needed was some cover for when Bruno is injured/suspended/out of form. Right now we have nothing to replace him with.

Maybe they thought it wasnt worth it if they have set their sight on a permanent replacement in the summer (moving Bruno further up the field). I guess we would be too stacked in sentral midfield then. Could have gotten a loanee though.

 

 

Edited by Displayname

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, The Butcher said:

"Supporters":anguish:

 

People are allowed to react however they want. Fucking forum police.

 

Yes, yes, this always gets brought up all the time.

 

No one has deleted your post, or asked you to change it, or kicked you off the forum. So clearly you are allowed to react how you want.

 

I am also just as free to be disgusted with some of the reactions and comments, and also free to bitch and complain about those reactions however I want.

 

So please give it a rest.

 

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...