Jump to content

Now That's What I Call Transfer Rumours! 7


Recommended Posts

16 minutes ago, Lotus said:

If we could actually get a striker and a wide player (on loan) then I would like us to get a proper athletic DM who is actually aware of how to play that position.

Bruno looks top as deep lying playmaker but I think he has some lapses on the actual defensive side of the game with players drifting in behind him.

He’s also not particularly strong nor quick. 
Magic with the ball though and very good at nicking it further up the pitch.

 

bruno playing too deep atm with shelves out imo, as you say you want him winning the ball high and bursting into the box to get on the end of stuff as he was last season

Link to post
Share on other sites

8 minutes ago, mrmojorisin75 said:

 

bruno playing too deep atm with shelves out imo, as you say you want him winning the ball high and bursting into the box to get on the end of stuff as he was last season

Aye, with our current availability Bruno has to play there. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

13 minutes ago, mrmojorisin75 said:

 

bruno playing too deep atm with shelves out imo, as you say you want him winning the ball high and bursting into the box to get on the end of stuff as he was last season

Playing too high if you ask me. He's playing Shelvey's role. Willock is the man who needs to be getting into the box.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Pulisic would be a massive statement signing late in the window in my opinion. It would be nice to close the window and a feel good signing like that. 
 

CHO could be great but there’s still doubts about him. If Pulisic signs he instantly goes into the first team and makes us better. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, St1pe said:

Pulisic would be a massive statement signing late in the window in my opinion. It would be nice to close the window and a feel good signing like that. 
 

CHO could be great but there’s still doubts about him. If Pulisic signs he instantly goes into the first team and makes us better. 

I think he’d be a good signing but wouldn’t call it a statement signing. He’s a Chelsea bench warmer. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

6 minutes ago, r0cafella said:

I think he’d be a good signing but wouldn’t call it a statement signing. He’s a Chelsea bench warmer. 


He’s good enough to start for Chelsea even if he doesn’t, though.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II

Pulisic would be to us what Coutinho is to Villa, a statement signing. But with injury/form/fitness issues similar. I’d have him here though without a doubt. Classy player on his day.

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, SUPERTOON said:

I’d be surprised if we end up with any of the Chelsea lads tbh, they are very likely to be included in any deals to sign Gordon and Fofana.


I reckon Batshuayi will end up at Everton and CHO at Leicester.

 

If that meant we got Gallagher or Pulisic on loan I’d be delighted with that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 minutes ago, Fantail Breeze said:

Is there anyone we aren’t interested in? Just seems like we’re randomly throwing bids around hoping that one of them does something.

 

It seems fairly obvious after losing out on Ekitike, bidding for Pedro and allegedly having interest in Ramos, that we have a pretty specific criteria for the forward role.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest HTT II
7 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

 

Mount is underrated, great player IMO. 

I think he’s overrated personally, offers nothing for England anyway. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Guest
This topic is now closed to further replies.
×
×
  • Create New...