AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 9, 2021 Share Posted April 9, 2021 Clinical. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
gdm Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 Looks games could be postponed next sat coz of the funeral. Looks like Scottish cup could be first to go Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Dinho lad Posted April 10, 2021 Share Posted April 10, 2021 He said that he didn't want any fuss over his funeral! Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Tweet by Hearts TVs commentator. Would be equivalent to Raisbeck posting similar. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 I'm definitely using "Oh, by the way, Fuck Off" to end sentences in the future Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Doctor Zaius Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Geordie Ahmed Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 Anyone know which website allows you to see team win/loss with and without certain players? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Nobody Posted April 11, 2021 Share Posted April 11, 2021 On 08/04/2021 at 15:32, AyeDubbleYoo said: xG is a measure of how good the chances are basically, based on where the shot is from, angle, distance, foot vs head etc etc If you create lots of chances you can have a great xG but if your finishing is worse than the model suggests you'll obviously end up much worse off. And same with defending, you can concede lots of chances but have better saving than average. It's not really a measure of how 'good' a team you are, because finishing, saving, blocking etc are all part of that equation as well. It's just one measure to show how good the opportunities you have and concede are. Problem with xG us that it doesn't take into account the actual goals scored. A team chasing a result is far more likely to have more chances than the winning team, so an xG table like that isn't really that accurate. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Does xG take into account a ‘double save’ for example? Say Gayle hits a shot at a keeper which may have been 0.3 chance of a goal, then puts the rebound wide which was also 0.3, does xG add that as 0.6 or 0.3 in total? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Superior Acuña Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 (edited) 6 minutes ago, Optimistic Nut said: Does xG take into account a ‘double save’ for example? Say Gayle hits a shot at a keeper which may have been 0.3 chance of a goal, then puts the rebound wide which was also 0.3, does xG add that as 0.6 or 0.3 in total? Quote In the 78th minute, Nürnberg attempted three shots which ultimately led to a goal. Hanno Behrens attempts a shot that is saved, but he is able to take a second shot as the ball is deflected off the defender. The second shot goes off the woodwork, which allows Adam Zreľák to easily tap it in. According to StatsBomb's expected goals model: Behrens' first shot with the goalkeeper in his way = .37 xG Behrens' second shot with the goalkeeper out of position but a defender in the way = .68 xG Zreľák's shot with an open net = .81 xG The sum of these three shots is 1.86 expected goals, even though it is impossible to score more than one goal in a single move. To solve this problem, we find the probability that the defending team does not allow a goal in this possession. In this case, the calculation is: (1 - .37) x (1 - .68) x (1 - .81) = .0383 or a 3.83% probability that Schalke does not allow a goal To find Nürnberg's xG, we simply subtract that probability from 1: 1 - .0383 = .9617 xG So for Gayle (1-0.3) x (1-0.3) = 0.7 x 0.7 = 0.49 of no goal, .51 XG https://fbref.com/en/expected-goals-model-explained/ Edited April 12, 2021 by Inferior Acuña Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
St1pe Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 This seems light years away from anything we’re doing. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 (edited) On 11/04/2021 at 11:53, Optimistic Nut said: Tweet by Hearts TVs commentator. Would be equivalent to Raisbeck posting similar. Following this, Hearts fans campaigning for the club to ‘leave it on the stand’ in regards to picking up the trophy when it gets awarded. Wanting the players to go up, take their medals and walk back down the tunnel. Edited April 12, 2021 by Optimistic Nut Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted April 12, 2021 Share Posted April 12, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
BlueStar Posted April 13, 2021 Share Posted April 13, 2021 Missed this at the time, but one of Grimsby's players was sent off for headbutting a teammate as they walked off for half time at the weekend Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Ben Posted April 13, 2021 Share Posted April 13, 2021 Those Neil Lennon videos are a bit shit, he looks in a bad place just now, poor soul. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted April 13, 2021 Share Posted April 13, 2021 What are our thoughts on player of the year (as it stands)? I think it should be: 1. Dias 2. Kane 3. Bruno ...but think it will be: 1. Bruno 2. Dias 3. Gundogen Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
54 Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 11 hours ago, The Prophet said: What are our thoughts on player of the year (as it stands)? I think it should be: 1. Dias 2. Kane 3. Bruno ...but think it will be: 1. Bruno 2. Dias 3. Gundogen It should be Dias > Bruno > Kane, but they've all been outstanding and any combination of the 3 is acceptable. Gundogan shouldn't and probably won't be anywhere near it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
The Prophet Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Nagglesman off to Bayern in the summer it seems. Inevitable. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 https://twitter.com/AndyMitten/status/1382309717029089282 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 5 hours ago, Froggy said: It should be Dias > Bruno > Kane, but they've all been outstanding and any combination of the 3 is acceptable. Gundogan shouldn't and probably won't be anywhere near it. Seemed like Gundogan was carrying Man City for quite a period of time. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Froggy Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 9 minutes ago, AyeDubbleYoo said: Seemed like Gundogan was carrying Man City for quite a period of time. Gundogan has been great, but he's well behind the other 3. He's not as important to City as Dias. Kane and Bruno would be above Dias apart from the fact that City will win the league. That has to count for a lot. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Hard to know how to assess players I guess, and how to factor in their team performance. Could even argue the improvement in Stones has been just as important as Dias. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Super Duper Branko Strupar Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Gundo's only really been good since Jan too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Disco Posted April 14, 2021 Share Posted April 14, 2021 Reckon Bruno will win both the press and players awards. Kane could beat him for the FWA though. Salah might be around the top 3 for both too. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts