Alexander Isak - International C*nt

[Wandy]

1 hour ago, JT24 said:

There it is. The bases being covered. 

Edwards is getting crucified on X by the dippers for this second tweet. If Isak is sold then Edward’s reputation really is in tatters mind.

[toon25]

59 minutes ago, HaydnNUFC said:

Me if he’s still here come September and scores.

 

 

Is that Thauvin?

[Memphis]

[Displayname]

49 minutes ago, Palestoon said:

 

I think it would be foolish to assume that we didn't consider the possibility of him leaving as part of our striker search.

 

But its also possible we were looking to bring another big name striker in along with keeping Isak as was reported earlier in the summer.

 

We bought Isak in initially to go along with our #9, so its not like we csnt have 2 starting caliber strikers on the books.

 

Also from a PSR perspective, theirs nothing stopping us from bringing in a Wilson replacement and a young up and comer to bed in if we assume Isak will be sold anyway next summer at the latest 

 

 

 

Guess you agree with me that the quote from Edwards was bs then?

 

Really don't think they would intentionally put us in the position where we would have to sell in June again. Having it at as backup plan incase Liverpool didn't meet our asking price? Maybe.

35 minutes ago, Ghandis Flip-Flop said:

Yeah because we have an abundance of them in the squad, it’s not as if we released Callum Wilson earlier in the summer or anything. This is the NO post equivalent of "no you can’t have a Domino's, we have Domino's at home"

Nice metaphor.

You believe what you will. I dont think for a second that we would spend half of our summer budget on a backup to Isak, especially when the standard of our squad is the way it is. 

It also seems very likely that Wissa has been on his way to us for some time as the "Wilson replacement", just waiting for Brentford to find theirs first.

[HaydnNUFC]

10 minutes ago, toon25 said:

 

Is that Thauvin?

Janmaat. Scoring the 5th in the 5-1 vs Spurs.

[vexred]

I really hope the club are just bluffing to try and draw out a big bid from Liverpool. He cant stay. 

[FloydianMag]

4 minutes ago, vexred said:

I really hope the club are just bluffing to try and draw out a big bid from Liverpool. He cant stay. 

Even if they offered £150M I hope we keep the cunt if only to piss of the dippers and their self entitled twats of fans.

[Mike]

46 minutes ago, Miggys First Goal said:

Need someone to replace Colo’s face with Big Joe and the other player with Isak. 
 

 

 It's insane how often I think about this.

[Casey]

1 minute ago, Mike said:

 

 It's insane how often I think about this.

Heed looks like it's about to pop. 

[relámpago blanco]

10 minutes ago, FloydianMag said:

Even if they offered £150M I hope we keep the cunt if only to piss of the dippers and their self entitled twats of fans.

Aye on that twitter post they come across as right twats. Saying that Isak should sue us. 

[McDog]

3 minutes ago, Mike said:

 

 It's insane how often I think about this.

 

 

Jesus H Christ, looks like he's about to choke the life out of that poor bastard.

[OverThere]

2 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Aye on that twitter post they come across as right twats. Saying that Isak should sue us. 

Why should Isak sue us? Maybe we should sue Isak for breach of contract, and Liverpool for blatant tapping up 

 

 

Edited August 9, 2025 by OverThere

[LFEE]

22 minutes ago, vexred said:

I really hope the club are just bluffing to try and draw out a big bid from Liverpool. He cant stay. 

Of course he can stay. Or do you want to see the club remain as mid table proposition to the outside world?

[McDog]

5 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Aye on that twitter post they come across as right twats. Saying that Isak should sue us. 

 

 

Your Lordship, it is our position that NUFC is honouring the contract my client signed against his wishes.

[TRon]

8 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Aye on that twitter post they come across as right twats. Saying that Isak should sue us. 

 

 

Sue us for what? Liverpool putting in shitty lowball offers?

 

 

[Skeletor]

Think Trent should sue for all the emotional distress they caused him denying him his move to Real Madrid much earlier.

[nufc123]

5 minutes ago, Skeletor said:

Think Trent should sue for all the emotional distress they caused him denying him his move to Real Madrid much earlier.

Had to run down his contract to get out.

[Skeletor]

Just now, nufc123 said:

Had to run down his contract to get out.

 

The Cartel Final Boss finally got their man.

[thomas]

nothing makes me dig my heels in more than denying entitled little spoiled brats what they want  fuck i hope everyone up the NUFC chain is as petty as I am. fuck off liverpool. 

 

 

Edited August 9, 2025 by thomas

[vexred]

14 minutes ago, LFEE said:

Of course he can stay. Or do you want to see the club remain as mid table proposition to the outside world?

 

He will poison the dressing room and spread negativity. 

[Pandamninator]

20 minutes ago, relámpago blanco said:

Aye on that twitter post they come across as right twats. Saying that Isak should sue us. 

 

I'm sure they were definitely taking the players side when the shoe was on the other foot and Liverpool just arbitrarily decided that the release clause in Suarezs contract wasn't valid when Arsenal activated it.

[Drewboy74]

6 minutes ago, vexred said:

 

He will poison the dressing room and spread negativity. 

He's being kept apart from the other players. He'll only get drafted in when it's 100% right to do so.

[Kanj]

Not that we need reminding of this - but feel  like it's worth pointing out that Liverpool were 7th in '12/13 w/ no UCL. Suárez had ~3 yrs left on his contract + disputed £40m clause; Arsenal bid £40m+£1, Liverpool said no despite his desire to leave, and kept him for '13/14 (finished 2nd). They then sold him when they were ready to Barca in '14. Isak in '25 has no clause, has ~3 years left on his contract and we have UCL this year - we're within our rights to expect and hold on to our best players and sell them when we are ready to do so - just as they did then. So their fans who can’t fucking look up history or think of history at their great honorable club, need to get a life. 

[Skeletor]

Just now, Kanj said:

Not that we need reminding of this - but feel  like it's worth pointing out that Liverpool were 7th in '12/13 w/ no UCL. Suárez had ~3 yrs left on his contract + disputed £40m clause; Arsenal bid £40m+£1, Liverpool said no despite his desire to leave, and kept him for '13/14 (finished 2nd). They then sold him when they were ready to Barca in '14. Isak in '25 has no clause, has ~3 years left on his contract and we have UCL this year - we're within our rights to expect and hold on to our best players and sell them when we are ready to do so - just as they did then. So their fans who can’t fucking look up history or think of history at their great honorable club, need to get a life. 

 

We need to stop listening to and caring what Liverpool fans are saying. They're a bunch of self-righteous, hypocritical cunts who are a borderline cult.

[Wilson]

9 minutes ago, vexred said:

 

He will poison the dressing room and spread negativity. 

 

Unless the rest of the dressing room are professionals. 

 

The only option for us at this point is to keep him. 

 

I'd rather risk a bit negativity in the changing room than going int a CL inclusive season with Osula as our starting striker.