MagPar Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 16 hours ago, kingxlnc said: Would anyone take Chiesa and say 130m? Still think there’s a player there and can play all across the front three Fucking NO! Why? Because we don't want to sell him to Ruinedmybreakfastpool. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagPar Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 17 hours ago, midds said: If the players want him gone then he'll probably be sold soon(ish), their wishes will carry some weight. Although it's telling that he's become so toxic that even his own mates don't even want to be around him let alone play football with him again. Seems like he's gone out of his way to deliberately piss off as many people associated with NUFC which is impressively cuntish, it's almost impressive to become such an arsehole so quickly. Still firmly in the 'let the cunt rot for a couple of seasons' camp but realistically I think we'll eventually cave at a really high price as we simply won't want to be seen to be losing face and letting him go on the cheap. I'm guessing about £140m+15m on deadline day Selling to Don'twipetheirbumspool at any price IS 'losing face'. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
MagPar Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 The club should issue an official statement today, I'll even write it. "Alexander Isak is not for sale this summer at any price. If he chooses to go on strike with the hope of facilitating a move then he is free to do so. He will though (in such a case) forfeit any payments and the club will pursue their own right to sue him for breach of contract. Mick Jagger has informed the club that "you can't always get what you want", sage words Mick. The door is open for him to be reintegrated back into the first team set up, but the women's team are always on the lookout for practice players (and have considerably more balls). From MagPar. Ps Fuck off Liverpool 😤 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izakaya Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 He's absolutely fucked it hasn't he 😂😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Fak Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 2 minutes ago, Izakaya said: He's absolutely fucked it hasn't he 😂😂 What's happened now? Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Izakaya Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 Just now, Fak said: What's happened now? Just in general 😂 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
HawK Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 He could sack his agent and apologise, there is always a way back Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
James Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 Due to PFA rules we are only allowed to issue any player a maximum of x weeks of fines a season - think it is 2 or 4 weeks. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Slim Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
OverThere Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 16 minutes ago, James said: Due to PFA rules we are only allowed to issue any player a maximum of x weeks of fines a season - think it is 2 or 4 weeks. I assume we would have to sue for breach of contract then. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Zero Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 Where’s the bid? Come on. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mag3.14 Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 30 minutes ago, James said: Due to PFA rules we are only allowed to issue any player a maximum of x weeks of fines a season - think it is 2 or 4 weeks. It's a maximum of 2 weeks per incident, there can be multiple fines so in theory each game he strikes could be fined a maximum fine of 2 weeks. PFA getout is however, that fines have to be "proportionate" Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
PauloGeordio Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 (edited) 41 minutes ago, HawK said: He could sack his agent and apologise, there is always a way back He’ll be offed if he does Edited August 13, 2025 by PauloGeordio Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Robster Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 51 minutes ago, MagPar said: The club should issue an official statement today, I'll even write it. "Fuck off Liverpool " From MagPar. Edited that for you. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Colos Short and Curlies Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 5 minutes ago, Robster said: Edited that for you. It's a bit long, I'd go with 'Fuck off La' Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon1984 Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 It is time clubs made a stand against player power. Isak and those despicable b*stards at Liverpool tried to use our PSR situation to force us into a decision which his contract is supposed to protect us from. I’m loving the club’s measured but firm stance - it’s time for Isak to realize Nufc is more important than he thinks it is. Hope we sue his balls off for breach of contract. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
KennyUtd Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 2 minutes ago, Toon1984 said: It is time clubs made a stand against player power. Isak and those despicable b*stards at Liverpool tried to use our PSR situation to force us into a decision which his contract is supposed to protect us from. I’m loving the club’s measured but firm stance - it’s time for Isak to realize Nufc is more important than he thinks it is. Hope we sue his balls off for breach of contract. He doesn't have any balls Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Chris_R Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 5 minutes ago, Toon1984 said: It is time clubs made a stand against player power. It's weird this. I mean I agree with you 100%, clearly. But I always find it odd that football is the only subject where we cheer the corporate entity over the employee. In any other circumstance we'd be on the other side, or at least I hope we'd be. But football flips it around. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Optimistic Nut Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 Wonder if the Three Stooges were stung with some of the feedback yesterday as this has been quiet today. Not like them. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
TaylorJ_01 Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 2 minutes ago, Chris_R said: It's weird this. I mean I agree with you 100%, clearly. But I always find it odd that football is the only subject where we cheer the corporate entity over the employee. In any other circumstance we'd be on the other side, or at least I hope we'd be. But football flips it around. Perhaps it shows it's not always a case of "employer bad, employee good". Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Mattoon Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 2 minutes ago, Chris_R said: It's weird this. I mean I agree with you 100%, clearly. But I always find it odd that football is the only subject where we cheer the corporate entity over the employee. In any other circumstance we'd be on the other side, or at least I hope we'd be. But football flips it around. I challenge you to think that about a lazy employee that does nothing, comes in late and heaps extra work on you in your job. There's plenty of scenarios where we back the big guy and vice versa, football or not. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Toon1984 Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 2 minutes ago, Chris_R said: It's weird this. I mean I agree with you 100%, clearly. But I always find it odd that football is the only subject where we cheer the corporate entity over the employee. In any other circumstance we'd be on the other side, or at least I hope we'd be. But football flips it around. All you have to do is cheer for the contract. They both signed it. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
11Tino11 Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 Quick Google AI says footballers equivalent corporate rank would be company director so that makes him fair game to me. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
AyeDubbleYoo Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 9 minutes ago, Chris_R said: It's weird this. I mean I agree with you 100%, clearly. But I always find it odd that football is the only subject where we cheer the corporate entity over the employee. In any other circumstance we'd be on the other side, or at least I hope we'd be. But football flips it around. I wouldn't call the club the corporate entity though really. The club is the sporting organisation and/or the manager and team. Guess an example of why comparing football and other industries is so difficult. Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
kingxlnc Posted August 13, 2025 Share Posted August 13, 2025 I'd love it if we actually got rid of Isak to Liverpool and they had a Carrol-esque season while we finish above them and challenge again Like that Pardew 5th season where they couldn't believe we had scouted such good players for cheap prices Link to post Share on other sites More sharing options...
Recommended Posts
Create an account or sign in to comment
You need to be a member in order to leave a comment
Create an account
Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!
Register a new accountSign in
Already have an account? Sign in here.
Sign In Now