Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

My other take on this is that the board have really got to come up trumps with deadline day incomings for Eddie today, otherwise they have left him up the creek without a paddle in my opinion.

 

So it places more pressure on them to deliver today as we cannot just let Isak go and have no-one come in, we still need 2 or 3 in my opinion.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Matt said:

 

I think we can draw some conclusions given the turn of events since the meeting last Monday. Now whether he would have really sat on his arse until next year is up for debate, but it's pretty obvious that was his position in those discussions.

 

 

that's why I edited my post. But I'd be very surprised if he refused to play for a season in a world cup year. It could be well down to the players absolutely despising the cunt though. I'd still be skeptical that there wasn't a way back from that on a temporary basis once the window shut and the douchebag was stuck here.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I'd also say this is the ownerships first real test on the transfer front.

 

Liverpool kept Suarez when he threw a wobbler.

 

Spurs kept Kane when he went on TV and stated he wasted to leave.

 

We've folded, signalling we're here to do nothing more than service the cartel. We've sent a message if you unsettle our player we'll do business on favourable terms. It's a total  capitulation.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

Any chance we could pull plug if we don’t sign a striker by 7pm? Do a Chelsea.

Be amazing if this was a big **** you to Liverpool and Isak by pulling the deal in the last second but sadly this is real life and can't see PIF working that way. But if they want to get the fans back on side that's how you do it.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, The College Dropout said:

Think playing 60-70 minutes a game will suit Isak. He’s pretty useless after 70 minutes unless there’s a penalty to be taken which he won’t get at Liverpool.   

Only professional footballer who can't play 90 mins, I think we all should recognise it was he couldn't be bothered, not he wasn't able too. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Matt said:

 

We didn't play Isak as an out-and-out striker when he first joined and I can similar for NW, which even more underlines the need for a body through the door tomorrow.

Today not tomorrow...

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, The Prophet said:

I'd also say this is the ownerships first real test on the transfer front.

 

Liverpool kept Suarez when he threw a wobbler.

 

Spurs kept Kane when he went on TV and stated he wasted to leave.

 

We've folded, signalling we're here to do nothing more than service the cartel. We've sent a message if you unsettle our player we'll do business on favourable terms. It's a total  capitulation.

Talk your shit. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, OoOGazOoO said:

My other take on this is that the board have really got to come up trumps with deadline day incomings for Eddie today, otherwise they have left him up the creek without a paddle in my opinion.

 

So it places more pressure on them to deliver today as we cannot just let Isak go and have no-one come in, we still need 2 or 3 in my opinion.

We don’t need 2 or 3, nor do we have squad space.

 

It’ll be 1, and providing the quality is decent, that’s fine.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Shadow Puppets said:

We don’t need 2 or 3, nor do we have squad space.

 

It’ll be 1, and providing the quality is decent, that’s fine.


Howe said himself on Saturday he wants one to complete the squad, or words similar to that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

9 minutes ago, duo said:

I don't think I've ever been this upset/angry about a transfer.  Just feels totally unnecessary when he's three years left. PIF just needed to stand firm a few more hours. 


Well not quite, they also need to utilise a guy who is refusing to play and then hope to sell him for a high fee after that. Or write off £100 million plus. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Vinny Green Balls said:

that's why I edited my post. But I'd be very surprised if he refused to play for a season in a world cup year. It could be well down to the players absolutely despising the cunt though. I'd still be skeptical that there wasn't a way back from that on a temporary basis once the window shut and the douchebag was stuck here.

 

But then you're at the point where we're playing for £15m or so on a fee with the possibility of him holding out. Something happened during that meeting that changes the scenario completely.

Link to post
Share on other sites

I can see him not being as successful at Liverpool. He relied heavily on Murphy who provided eight assists for Isaks Premier League goals last season, and then there is Gordon's and Barnes' assists. 

 

Liverpool do not play that game of early crosses for the main man with Salah and Gakpo who both play out wide for themselves to cut in to shoot. 

 

Clutching at straws as I've never wanted a player to fail as much. Isak personally by his actions took £25m off his price tag and our weak management never fined him a weeks wage in doing so. 

 

Gutted! 

 

 

Edited by TopL0ader

Link to post
Share on other sites

People kicking off about us selling him as it sets a precedent what were we supposed to do. He quite clearly would have sat on his arse and not played. He has already cost us at least 6 points if not 9. It would be a constant distraction Howe getting asked about him. It’s better getting rid. I’m just gutted it’s Liverpool I can’t stand them 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, OoOGazOoO said:

My other take on this is that the board have really got to come up trumps with deadline day incomings for Eddie today, otherwise they have left him up the creek without a paddle in my opinion.

 

So it places more pressure on them to deliver today as we cannot just let Isak go and have no-one come in, we still need 2 or 3 in my opinion.

We need 1, and hopefully we get that.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, TopL0ader said:

I can see him not being as successful at Liverpool. He relied heavily on Murphy who provided eight assists for Isaks Premier League goals, and then there is Gordon's and Barnes' assists. 

 

Liverpool do not play that game of early crosses for the main man with Salah and Gakpo who both play out wide for themselves to cut in to shoot. 

 

Clutching at straws as I've never wanted a player to fail as much. Isak personally by his actions took £25m off his price tag and our weak management never fined him a weeks wage in doing so. 

 

Gutted! 

I’m down on the club for the way they’ve handled this but the one credit is getting the treacherous cunt to forgo the ridiculous concept of a loyalty bonus. That covers the wages and some.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Remember - this is all strategically planned and executed by Eddie's buddies from the south - Michael Edwards and Richard Hughes. Tapped him up, agreed terms with the player and carried the whole plan out perfectly. 

 

image.thumb.png.09aecd7479f96bd2a7fe763f487b726e.png

 

 

Edited by hallihg
typo

Link to post
Share on other sites

I know there's a lot of anger towards PIF for caving in at 130m and appearing weak. I'm not going to argue against any fans who feel that way or stick up for the ownership, but I will say that I think a lot of people are underestimating just how much influenced Eddie and the squad have had. It seems they shut down any notion of reintegration which is their absolute right and the idea of PIF having a 9 figure asset rotting in the reserves is fanciful at best, as satisfying as the idea of it is.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, Matt said:

 

But then you're at the point where we're playing for £15m or so on a fee with the possibility of him holding out. Something happened during that meeting that changes the scenario completely.

I don't see how it does since the window hadn't shut. Other huge players were compelled to stay after throwing tantrums. Plenty of precedent for getting the players to continue to play for the club for at least a season. Is this so remarkably different from them? Suarez is the biggest douche in football history and Liverpool squeezed another 30 goals out of him.

 

 

Edited by Vinny Green Balls

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...