Jump to content

Alexander Isak - International C*nt


Ha ha ha?  

179 members have voted

  1. 1. Hohoho

    • Hahaha
      94
    • Heeheehee
      85


Recommended Posts

13 hours ago, Optimistic Nut said:

Their decision to try and get Guehi on the cheap so late in the window and put all their chips on Isak is looking more ridiculous by the match. Should have just given Palace a bit more earlier in the window so they had time to replace him, and get someone as cover for Ekitike. Hell, they could have even got Woltemade.

They bought him because they could. They didn’t stop to think about whether or not they should. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

11 minutes ago, Displayname said:

The Isak I'm seeing at Liverpool now is just like the Isak I saw with us last season minus Murphy. 

Not surprisee at all and don't think it has very much to do with being match fit or not.

 

 

 

Murphy is the real elite talent. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

21 minutes ago, bobbydazzla said:

 

This has caused me deep offence. It's absolutely unacceptable. I'm actually flabbergasted. What kind of wrong'un puts the apostrophe after the v.

The same kind of heinous monster who thinks a rhetorical question doesn't need a question mark. This country's going to the dogs.

Link to post
Share on other sites

39 minutes ago, Elbel1 said:

Pretty sure Slot said, just last week, that Isak is fully fit and the time to judge him is now

 

He did indeed say that. Straight after Sweden lost when he was again useless, causing his international manager to get sacked. No refunds.

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, McCormick said:

I think his positioning is making Salah look worse.

They make each other look worse. 
 

Salah and Gakpo don’t suit Isak. They don’t look for him early at all. 
 

Wirtz on the left and Frimpong in the side somewhere would suit Isak a lot more. 2 players that would look for him early. Gakpo and Wirtz doesn’t work either.

Link to post
Share on other sites

23 minutes ago, Dr Venkman said:

They bought him because they could. They didn’t stop to think about whether or not they should. 

 

If they hadn't signed Ekitike even. He probably will come good but the points they're losing at the minute could cost them the title. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 hour ago, RUHRLYASLEEVESUP said:

Would bet my left bollock Ratboy will play for Eddie again sometime in the future, where that will be iv'e zero idea, but i'm 99% confident he will 

Where Eddie goes, Mad Dog goes.

Any sign of weakness from Eddie, which I cannot imagine anyway, would be quickly shut down.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Having watched him yesterday, I just can’t see how it clicks for him there. There was a position stat that came up, which showed he was operating primary off the right, Salah area :D Just strange. As soon as Etitike was on, and even after Isak went off, Etitike was coming in off left and was much more of a threat.

 

There’s no doubt in my mind Etitike is the better player for Liverpool with Salah on RW. Isak is playing like he’s expecting first time crosses from Murphy still, which won’t happen at Liverpool. Maybe would’ve if TAA was still there, but that’s gone too.

 

Quite confident by season end, there will be legit questions raised if Liverpool look to cut losses on Isak when he’s a clear number 2 to Etitike.

Link to post
Share on other sites

17 minutes ago, Sibierski said:

Having watched him yesterday, I just can’t see how it clicks for him there. There was a position stat that came up, which showed he was operating primary off the right, Salah area :D Just strange. As soon as Etitike was on, and even after Isak went off, Etitike was coming in off left and was much more of a threat.

 

There’s no doubt in my mind Etitike is the better player for Liverpool with Salah on RW. Isak is playing like he’s expecting first time crosses from Murphy still, which won’t happen at Liverpool. Maybe would’ve if TAA was still there, but that’s gone too.

 

Quite confident by season end, there will be legit questions raised if Liverpool look to cut losses on Isak when he’s a clear number 2 to Etitike.

Frimpong’s attacking style is suited to Isak.   Salah/Bradley on the right and Gakpo on the left stink for Isak. 
 

Etikite is better suited to play with Salah.  Better at linking up, playing wall passes and such. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Ekitike coming on a sub yesterday looked like he was on a mission to shoot on sight and not set anyone up.

 

A big eScouser moan recently has been about Gakpo predictably cutting inside and how they need a "proper" left winger. Gakpo alone was 80% of their goal threat in this match.

 

Based on Ekitike's Bundesliga finishing and the ill fit of Isak who'll have to be persevered with due to the fee, I can't see either getting many more than 12-13 this season in the league. This contrasts with 11 goals and 8 assists from 2000 minutes in Klopp's last season from yes, the one and only Darwin Nunez.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Here is Isak's touch map yesterday. He only touched the ball once in the left side of the field. That famous dribble against Everton was down the left touchline. Presumably this below is Slot's doing.

image.thumb.png.1be8fa29910bae11609c02ec69c7bcec.png

This is picked at random, but here is the 3-3 against Liverpool at SJP last season.

image.thumb.png.a2d561618b6d694ea04f7bca7c7e5350.png

Link to post
Share on other sites

There's a JLA video on it. Basically they have 4 players (Wirtz, Ekitike, Ratman, Gakpo) whose main strengths are picking up the ball in that inside left channel, in space, while Salah on the opposite side doesn't track back and doesn't suit the other players. 

 

Would love nothing more for the entire thing to be a complete disaster and for it to never work.

 

Their starting forward line should probably be Gakpo, Ekitike, Chiesa, but it seems like they'd rather save face with their big name players/signings than do what's most effective.

Link to post
Share on other sites

1 minute ago, AyeDubbleYoo said:

Letting Diaz go seemed a very weird move considering he was probably playing his best football for them. 

They had to let him go because of age and the contract situation. If they werent extending his contract on better wages then he had to be sold.

Isak was a bit of a splurge, and once they got Ekitike, they should've stopped chasing Isak. But, once he went on strike they had to go through with it. They should've gone for Guehi, a DM/CM, a RW, and a backup striker. Their team would've been way more balanced.

 

They probably need to drop another 300 million to sort their team out now with Salah and VVD leaving soon. Once you're down that rabbit hole, it's tough to get out without just throwing money at it. Just look at Man Utd/Chelsea etc

Arteta has had to spend a billion pounds just to get Arsenal where they are now.

 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Anderson said:

 

I've seen people say this a few time, they absolutely didn't. :lol: 

 

Yeah seeing this loads. Absolute nonsense

 

A well ran football club isn't gonna do something they don't want to do because they don't want to upset a player 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, Anderson said:

 

I've seen people say this a few time, they absolutely didn't. :lol: 

 

Aye I don't see why they would care about us being saddled with a player who refused to play for us just because they'd shown an interest in him. In fact from their POV you could argue they played an absolute blinder unsettling our top scorer and then going in for someone else instead.

 

Isak’s behaviour is his problem. He's paying for it now, for club and Country. Long may it continue.

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...