Jump to content

Alexander Isak


Disco

Recommended Posts

Don't see the point in criticising his performance when he was clearly dead on his feet like. Ordinarily he/we wouldn't be in that position. We expecting decent hold up play from guys who can barely walk? Pointless criticism which I doubt Howe is levelling at him. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Are many people criticising him, though? Most, not all. Seem to be merely pointing out that he was understandably exhausted. Which was why his touch was off and his pace wasn’t there. 
 

I see it as more of an observation and one of the reasons why we struggled after 55-60 minutes. Not a necessarily a slight on Isak and saying he was poor, has to do better, not good enough etc. 

 

In an ideal world. He would have been subbed for Wilson after 60 and we could have brought on fresh legs out wide and in midfield as well. I guess Isak was just the most noticeable. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 hours ago, Interpolic said:

Don't see the point in criticising his performance when he was clearly dead on his feet like. Ordinarily he/we wouldn't be in that position. We expecting decent hold up play from guys who can barely walk? Pointless criticism which I doubt Howe is levelling at him. 

Even quicker than I expected. 

Saying he could barely walk is needlessly emotive and incorrect. 

 

Was his point not that he thinks Isak could get his fitness levels up and become better at hold up play? Learning from Tuesday, those would be positive developments for player and fans alike. Think of it as “yes he’s great but he could be even greater with more work and time”. 
 

It’s ok to say and hear negative things; it can (and often does) lead to positive things as a direct result. Questioning whether someone might be fitter isn’t saying that they didn’t put in a great shift or have 2 good games back from injury. It’s just saying that, with hindsight and just as a thought, might be something to work on (especially given our ambitions mean we want this many games or more season after season). 

Link to post
Share on other sites

As I posted on the evening I’d be absolutely amazed if he wasn’t told to stop running about needlessly and contain his energy/protect himself so he’s able to play at least 75 mins today.

 

If you’re having a go at him for Tuesday which is ridiculous it’s his miss before his goal that was way more egregious.

Link to post
Share on other sites

It’s not having a go man.  Get a grip. It’s an observation and not one unique to Tuesday.  
 

Every footballer has strengths and weaknesses.   Even prior to this latest injury, Isak has struggled with stamina under Howe’s system (AC Milan springs to mind and games last season) at times.  And at times he loses the ball too easily and frequently for a player of his quality.  
 

This is mostly a physical thing which you would hope could be improved over time with the right diet and training programme. 

59 minutes ago, Theregulars said:

Even quicker than I expected. 

Saying he could barely walk is needlessly emotive and incorrect. 

 

Was his point not that he thinks Isak could get his fitness levels up and become better at hold up play? Learning from Tuesday, those would be positive developments for player and fans alike. Think of it as “yes he’s great but he could be even greater with more work and time”. 
 

It’s ok to say and hear negative things; it can (and often does) lead to positive things as a direct result. Questioning whether someone might be fitter isn’t saying that they didn’t put in a great shift or have 2 good games back from injury. It’s just saying that, with hindsight and just as a thought, might be something to work on (especially given our ambitions mean we want this many games or more season after season). 

This is it. 
 

A lot of times on here Criticism leads to non-stop criticism and x player should be sold/improved on.  So there’s no he’s great at x, could be better at y and we love him. It’s Pope can’t kick, let’s upgrade him with Ramsdale.  Or Wilson is always injured - let’s replace him with someone that can stay fit. 
 

To be the truly elite player I know Isak can be. He’s going to have to get fitter and use his size better.  

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 hours ago, Theregulars said:

It’s ok to say and hear negative things; it can (and often does) lead to positive things as a direct result. 

 

If you and TCD talking bollocks on here is going to somehow lead to great things for Isak and NUFC then I'm reluctant to interrupt. But Isak's fitness levels were and are clearly not optimal atm so it seems a bizarre time to criticise his... fitness levels. 

 

When he's on a run of 6 or 7 games his fitness levels are fine, he's not quite Bellamy but his pressing is fine, he's not quite Drogba but his hold up play is fine. Just smacks of scrambling to find something wrong beyond a half fit player doing the best he could for us in pretty dire circumstances. 

 

And thanks for keeping my emotive language in check, you're a lifesaver. It's that kind of unnecessarily condescending stuff that gets people's back up when in conversation with you on the football forum, if you care at all :thup:

Link to post
Share on other sites

Just now, Rafalove said:

Haven’t seen many people talking about him, but even though he missed some chances I thought he was great coming deep to link up play and was partly responsible for how good we were at dominating the midfield area.


His fitness looks to be coming in again too now 

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 minutes ago, Rafalove said:

Haven’t seen many people talking about him, but even though he missed some chances I thought he was great coming deep to link up play and was partly responsible for how good we were at dominating the midfield area.

Agree. He did some turns in the middle of the park that were outrageous. Link up play was fantastic. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Yeah, he had a great game. I need to see that chance back from the first half that he dragged wide from eight yards but I couldn’t care less, he’s brilliant. If he hadn’t been fucked he’d have scored with that run he went on that started 1v1

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 minutes ago, gbandit said:

Yeah, he had a great game. I need to see that chance back from the first half that he dragged wide from eight yards but I couldn’t care less, he’s brilliant. If he hadn’t been fucked he’d have scored with that run he went on that started 1v1


the shot was on target, looked like Obama would have saved it, just hit one of their defenders and we got a corner. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

2 minutes ago, aussiemag said:


the shot was on target, looked like Obama would have saved it, just hit one of their defenders and we got a corner. 

Ah ok, I couldn’t see from my angle but I thought he’d dragged it wide and it had hit someone 

Link to post
Share on other sites

5 hours ago, Ronaldo said:

I wonder if there’ll ever be a striker as good in isolation as Drogba. Unbelievable athlete. 

 

You rarely see that combination of peak physicality and expert diving in the same player, truly a generational athlete.

Link to post
Share on other sites

4 hours ago, Boey_Jarton said:

Agree. He did some turns in the middle of the park that were outrageous. Link up play was fantastic. 

There was one in particular where he spun Maguire, he left him in no man's land

 

I thought he was really good when dropping deep, either retained possession well and dragged their defenders out or managed to turn them 

 

He's brilliant, just hope he can stay injury free

Link to post
Share on other sites

On 26/11/2023 at 09:52, aussiemag said:

 

I would go as far as saying Isak, Bruno, Gordon, Trippier, Botman and Schar in current form would get a game for almost every team in the world. 

 
sticking with this and adding Livramento 

Link to post
Share on other sites

12 hours ago, Rafalove said:

Haven’t seen many people talking about him, but even though he missed some chances I thought he was great coming deep to link up play and was partly responsible for how good we were at dominating the midfield area.

Agreed. He was coming deep and linking it up v. well.  He didn’t get his goal but he had a good game. 
 

He was economical in the press too which meant he had some gas towards the end. 

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...