Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

Their jobs usually don't require interpretation and judgment based on subtly changing rules. Refereeing competence has been questioned in every sport since there were professional leagues.

 

But honestly, people look for conspiracy under every rock when it is much more likely that we'll notice the incompetent performances, and completely forget about decent jobs. It's a relatively new technology added to a few rule changes. Wonder what the propensity for correct calls will be in five years time.   

 

 

 

Looking at a picture is not a new technology, neither does the offside rule require interpretation in this case. 

And it doesnt have to be a major conspiracy for it to be corruption involved.

 

 

 

Edited by Displayname

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Looking at a picture is not a new technology, neither does the offside rule require interpretation. 

And it doesnt have to be a major conspiracy for it to be corruption involved.

 

It is against Liverpool who have gotten the rub of the green.  Some of you see corruption in every damn thing when incompetence is usually a more obvious answer. Given some of your early posts about Russell Brand, don't you see a pattern with yourself here, Spooky Mulder?

 

 

Edited by Vinny Green Balls

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...