Jump to content

Recommended Posts

11 minutes ago, Vinny Green Balls said:

Their jobs usually don't require interpretation and judgment based on subtly changing rules. Refereeing competence has been questioned in every sport since there were professional leagues.

Ā 

But honestly, people look for conspiracy under every rock when it is much more likely that we'll notice the incompetent performances, and completely forget about decent jobs. It's a relatively new technology added to a few rule changes. Wonder what the propensity for correct calls will be in five years time.Ā  Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Ā 

Looking at a picture is not a new technology, neither does the offside rule require interpretation in this case.Ā 

And it doesnt have to be a major conspiracy for it to be corruption involved.

Ā 

 

 

Edited by Displayname

Link to post
Share on other sites

3 minutes ago, Displayname said:

Looking at a picture is not a new technology, neither does the offside rule require interpretation.Ā 

And it doesnt have to be a major conspiracy for it to be corruption involved.

Ā 

It is against Liverpool who have gotten the rub of the green.Ā  Some of you see corruption in every damn thing when incompetence is usually a more obvious answer. Given some of your early posts about Russell Brand, don't you see a pattern with yourself here, Spooky Mulder?

 

 

Edited by Vinny Green Balls

Link to post
Share on other sites

Create an account or sign in to comment

You need to be a member in order to leave a comment

Create an account

Sign up for a new account in our community. It's easy!

Register a new account

Sign in

Already have an account? Sign in here.

Sign In Now
×
×
  • Create New...